Comparison of Sample Biopsy Using Scalpel or Er:YAG Laser

October 11, 2018 updated by: University of Zurich

Randomized Prospective Study for the Comparison of Sample Biopsy Using Scalpel or Er:YAG Laser

For certain changes in the oral mucosa a histopathological examination of the affected tissue is indicated to confirm the diagnosis. The gold standard is the biopsy by scalpel. The aim of this study is to compare the alternative method of tissue sampling using the erbium doped yttrium aluminium garnet (Er:YAG) laser with the gold Standard.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Various parameters are compared, such as the pain intensity during and after the biopsy, the evaluation of the tissue removed by the histopathologist, the occurrence of bleeding during and after the removal and the time required for both therapies.

Patients who agree to participate in the study will be randomized (randomly) to either therapy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

44

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Zürich, Switzerland, 8032
        • Clinic for Oral Surgery, Center of dental medicine, University of Zurich

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for biopsy of the oral mucosa
  • male and female adult patients
  • Written consent of the participating persons after clarification

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pregnancy
  • Taking blood thinners
  • Known infectious diseases
  • Untreated diabetes mellitus
  • Taking immunosuppressants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: Biopsy with Er: YAG
Removal of specimen biopsies in patients with leukoplakic or lichenoid mucosal lesions using Er: YAG laser under previous local anesthesia
Removal of specimen biopsies in patients with leukoplakic or lichenoid mucosal lesions using Er: YAG laser or scalpel under previous local anesthesia.
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Biopsy with Scalpel
Biopsies taken with Er: YAG are compared with biopsies taken with a scalpel in patients with lichenoid or leukoplakic changes of the oral mucosa.
Removal of specimen biopsies in patients with leukoplakic or lichenoid mucosal lesions using Er: YAG laser or scalpel under previous local anesthesia.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
histological assessability
Time Frame: 13 month

The primary endpoint is the histological assessability of the samples. This is evaluated by the histologist and divided into degrees 0-3. The

Subdivision of the artifacts takes place according to the following degrees:

0: none, 1: slight artifacts, not affecting the evaluation of the sample, 2: moderate artifacts, slight deterioration in the evaluability of the sample, 3: severe artifacts, severely impaired

13 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain
Time Frame: 13 month
The pain is measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS) 0-10, 0 = no pain, 10 = worst possible pain
13 month
postoperative bleeding
Time Frame: 13 month
The bleeding is determined with yes or no.
13 month
time for removal
Time Frame: 13 month
The time to remove is measured in seconds
13 month

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin Rücker, Prof.Dr.Dr., Sponsor GmbH

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2018

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

November 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 17, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

August 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

October 12, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2018-01364

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Laser Burn

Clinical Trials on Biopsy

3
Subscribe