Evaluation of the Efficacy of Surfaktant in Preterm Infants by Lung Ultrasound

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Different Surfactant Preparations in Preterm Infants by Lung Ultrasound

To compare the lung ultrasound scores after two different natural surfactant administration as a parameter reflecting lung inflation. Poractant alfa decreases lung ultrasound scores as efficient as beractant treatment

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Outcomes:

Improvement of Lung usg scores after surfactanct and the difference between groups at different time points (2nd and 6hr).

Secondary outcome:

The correlation between lung usg scores and clinical scores (silverman scores), FiO2 and PCO2 levels, failure of weaning to noninvasive ventilation after surfactant Preterm infants of 32 gestational weeks and below, who admit to the NICU with signs of respiratory distress, treated with non invasive or mechanical ventilation and require surfactant treatment in 6 hours of life will be enrolled.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 hour to 6 hours (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm infants of 32 gestational weeks and below, who admit to the NICU with signs of respiratory distress, treated with non invasive or mechanical ventilation and require surfactant treatment in 6 hours of life will be enrolled.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major congenital anomalies.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: group 1 Poractant alfa
Poractant alfa generic name: curosurf 120 and 240 mg flk dosage: 200 mg/ kg intratracheal application frequency and duration: in the first two hours
Comparison of lung usg scores in infants treated with Poractant alfa and Beractant: 0 indicates A-pattern (defined by the presence of the only A-lines); 1, B-pattern (defined as the presence of ≥3 well-spaced B-lines); 2, severe B-pattern (defined as the presence of crowded and coalescent B-lines with or without consolidations limited to the subpleural space); and 3, extended consolidations.
Active Comparator: group 2 beractant
beractant generic name: survanta 8 cc flk dosage: 4 cc/ kg intratracheal application frequency and duration: in the first two hours
lComparison of lung usg scores in infants treated with Poractant alfa and Beractant: 0 indicates A-pattern (defined by the presence of the only A-lines); 1, B-pattern (defined as the presence of ≥3 well-spaced B-lines); 2, severe B-pattern (defined as the presence of crowded and coalescent B-lines with or without consolidations limited to the subpleural space); and 3, extended consolidations.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Lung usg scores
Time Frame: first days

Evaluation of Lung Usg Scores in infants treated with surfactant in the first six hours (Brat lung usg scores). Each item scored 0-3. (0 indicates A-pattern (defined by the presence of the only A-lines); 1, B-pattern (defined as the presence of ≥3 well-spaced B-lines); 2, severe B-pattern (defined as the presence of crowded and coalescent B-lines with or without consolidations limited to the subpleural space); and 3, extended consolidations.)

- Higher values represent a worse outcome

first days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Evrim Alyamaç Dizdar, MD, zekai tahir burak matarnity teaching hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 28, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 30, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2018

Last Verified

March 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 22032018

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Ultrasound Scores

Clinical Trials on group 1 Poractant alfa

3
Subscribe