Poractant Alfa (Curosurf®)) -- Effect in Adult Patients Diagnosed With 2019 Novel Coronavirus (SARS-COV-19; (Covid-19)) Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

May 31, 2023 updated by: Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A.

Multicenter, Open-label, Randomised Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Tolerability of Poractant Alfa(Porcine Surfactant, Curosurf®) in Hospitalized Patients With SARS-COV-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of poractant alfa (Curosurf®), administered by endotracheal (ET) instillation in hospitalized adult patients diagnosed with SARS-COV-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This was a multicentre, open-label, randomized phase II proof-of-concept study.

The efficacy and safety of poractant alfa was evaluated in terms of ventilatory free days during the 21 days after randomization, in adult patients diagnosed with ARDS due to SARS-COV-19 infection.

Each patient randomized to the study treatment received 3 administrations of Curosurf ® with a 24 hours dosing interval. The assessment collection was up to Day 28, when the evaluation occurred at the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), or by phone call if the patient has already been discharged.

Seventy patients were planned to be randomized in the study with a ratio 3:2 (i.e. 42 patients in the poractant alfa arm and 28 in the control arm). The control arm population received Standard of Care (SoC). This study was conducted in United Kingdom (UK), United States of America (US), and Italy.

Overall, 13 patients (Curosurf ® group) and 8 patients (control group) were randomised in the study. Due to low recruitment rate the study was terminated early for non-safety reasons.

Curosurf® is a pulmonary surfactant of natural origin which, when delivered endotracheally (ET). Curosurf® is currently approved for marketing as treatment of premature neonates with RDS or at risk of Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS). Chiesi Farmaceutici S.p.A (Chiesi) conducted this study with its porcine-derived surfactant, Curosurf® (poractant alfa), to evaluate the efficacy and safety in ventilated adult patients who were critically unwell in intensive care with SARS-COV-19 ARDS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bologna, Italy, 40138
        • Chiesi site # 14
      • Modena, Italy, 41124
        • Chiesi site #13
      • London, United Kingdom, NW1 2BU
        • UCLH and UCL 250 Euston Road
      • London, United Kingdom, SW10 9NH
        • Chiesi site #4
      • Southampton, United Kingdom, SO16 6YD
        • Chiesi site # 12
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
        • Henry Ford Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 78 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Participants were eligible to be included in the study if the following criteria apply:

  1. Male or female ≥18 and ≤ 80 years of age
  2. Informed consent for participation in the study (refer to section 15 for detailed inform consent procedure)
  3. Positive 2019-nCoV Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rt-PCR) before randomisation
  4. Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen/Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio < 150 mmHg
  5. Lung compliance ≤45 ml/cmH20
  6. Intubated and artificially ventilated less than 48 hours before the first poractant alfa administration

Exclusion Criteria:

Participants were excluded from the study if any of the following criteria apply:

  1. Any contraindications to surfactant administration e.g., pulmonary hemorrhage and pneumothorax)
  2. Weight < 40kg
  3. Stage 4 severe chronic kidney disease (i.e., Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) < 30)
  4. Pregnancy
  5. Administration of any nebulized surfactant in the 48 hours before the first poractant alfa administration
  6. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control
Patients treated with standard-of-care (SoC), as control cohort
Experimental: Poractant alfa
Patients treated with CUROSURF® (poractant alfa), as an add-on to standard-of-care (SoC)

Three administrations with a 24 hours dosing interval.

Each endotracheal (ET) administration 1, 2, and 3 consisted of poractant alfa bolus:

30mg /kg (Lean Body Weight-LBW) = 0.375ml /kg LBW, diluted with normal saline up to 2ml /kg LBW.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Days Alive and Ventilator-free Days
Time Frame: up to 21 days

The number of days alive and ventilator-free days, defined as the number of days the patient is not receiving mechanical ventilation over the 21 days following randomisation.

Mechanical ventilation was defined as invasive and non-invasive. The patient was defined as free of mechanical ventilation after 12 hours from the suspension of either invasive and non-invasive ventilation. Patients who died or were mechanically ventilated longer than this period were assessed as zero ventilator-free days.

up to 21 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Alive and Free of Respiratory Failure at Day 28
Time Frame: at Day 28
The percentage of patients alive and free of respiratory failure (i.e. without need for mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), non-invasive ventilation, or high-flow nasal cannula oxygen delivery) at Day 28.
at Day 28
Number of Days Alive and Ventilator-Free at Day 28
Time Frame: at Day 28
The number of days alive and ventilator-free (i.e. free of any mechanical ventilation for at least 12 hours) at Day 28.
at Day 28
Mortality at Day 21 and Day 28
Time Frame: at Day 21 and at Day 28
Mortality at Day 21 and Day 28 of the study by treatment group.
at Day 21 and at Day 28
Number of Days Alive and Free From Invasive Ventilation at Day 21 and Day 28
Time Frame: Day 21 and Day 28
The number of days alive and free from invasive ventilation at Day 21 and Day 28 is presented by treatment group.
Day 21 and Day 28
Number of Days Alive and Free From Non-Invasive Ventilation at Day 21 and Day 28
Time Frame: Day 21 and Day 28
The number of days alive and free from non-invasive ventilation at Day 21 and Day 28 is presented by treatment group.
Day 21 and Day 28
Percentage of Patients With Improvement in Severity Status at Day 28 or Discharge (Severity Score: Mild, Moderate, Severe, or Death)
Time Frame: Day 28 or Discharge, whichever comes first

The severity status of patients at baseline and at Day 28/Discharge and the percentage of patients with improvement in severity status (i.e. a decrease of at least 1 point in severity status) at Day 28/Discharge relative to baseline is presented.

Severity was assessed using a point score system: Severity score was defined as mild, moderate, severe (see below*), or death and was based on PaO2/FiO2 ratio and patient status at Day 28/Discharge and numerically rated from 1-4, respectively. An improvement in severity was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point between baseline and Day 28/Discharge.

At Day 28 the last follow up evaluation took place on the ICU if, still requiring critical care, or by phone call if the patient has been discharged from ICU by that time.

*Mild: 200 mmHg < PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤300 mmHg; Moderate: 100 mmHg < PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤200 mmHg; Severe: PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤100 mmHg

Day 28 or Discharge, whichever comes first
Change From Baseline in Arterial Partial Pressure of Oxygen / Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) Ratio at Each Timepoint
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28

Change from baseline in PaO2/FiO2 ratio measured at each timepoint following administration of each dose in the treatment and control group.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

Partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) is the oxygen pressure in arterial blood. The fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) is the concentration of oxygen in the gas mixture.

The fraction of inspired oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio is widely used in ICUs as an indicator of oxygenation status.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28
Percentage of Patients Alive and With PaO2/FiO2 Ratio Improvement >20% Compared to Baseline at Each Timepoint
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
The percentages of patients in categories of PaO2/FiO2 ratio improvement compared to baseline (>20%) at all timepoints post-baseline are summarised by treatment group.
up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
Change From Baseline in Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2) at Each Timepoint
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28

The FiO2 at baseline and at selected timepoints post-baseline was measured. Results are shown as changes from baseline, summarised by treatment group.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline. The unit for the variable is percent (%) and what is reported is an absolute change.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
Length of ICU Stay (Days) at Day 28
Time Frame: up to 28 days
The length of ICU stay (days) at Day 28 is presented by treatment by treatment group. Patients who died or were mechanically ventilated longer than this period were assigned with 28 days.
up to 28 days
Percentage of Patients Alive and Out of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) at Day 28
Time Frame: Day 28
The percentage of patients alive and out of ICU at Day 28 is presented by treatment group.
Day 28
Delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) Score and Sub-component Measure at Day 3 and Day 28
Time Frame: Day 3 and Day 28 or discharge -- whichever comes first

The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score is a scoring system that assesses the performance of several organ systems in the body. The SOFA score was used to determine the extent of organ failure at Day 3 and Day 28/Discharge with respect to a pre-randomisation assessment.

The total score was derived from six sub-scores system categories: respiratory, neurological, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, and renal systems; respective sub-scores were calculated primarily considering PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Glasgow Coma Scale, mean arterial pressure (MAP) or requirement for vasopressor administration, bilirubin levels, platelet levels and creatinine levels or daily urine output.

A score of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4) was assigned to each of the six system category. The total score ranged from 0 (min) to 24 (max) points. To be considered organ failure free, a patient had to have a score of 0.

Day 3 and Day 28 or discharge -- whichever comes first
Percentage of Patients Alive and Free of Organ Failure (SOFA Score=0)
Time Frame: at day 28 or discharge -- whichever comes first

The percentage of patients alive and organ failure free (defined as SOFA score=0) at Day 28/Discharge is presented by treatment group.

The total score was derived from six sub-scores system categories: respiratory, neurological, cardiovascular, hepatic, coagulation, and renal systems; respective sub-scores were calculated primarily considering PaO2/FiO2 ratio, Glasgow Coma Scale, mean arterial pressure (MAP) or requirement for vasopressor administration, bilirubin levels, platelet levels and creatinine levels or daily urine output.

A score of 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4) was assigned to each of the six system category. The total score ranged from 0 (min) to 24 (max) points. To be considered organ failure free, a patient had to have a score of 0.

at day 28 or discharge -- whichever comes first
Ventilatory Parameter: Tidal Volume -- Change From Baseline in Tidal Volume (mL/kg BW) at All Timepoints up to Day 3 (72 Hours) and at Day 28
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28

Ventilatory parameter: Change from baseline in tidal volume (mL/kg BW) at all timepoints up to Day 3 (72 hours) and at Day 28.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

Tidal volume is the amount of air that moves in or out of the lungs with each respiratory cycle.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
Ventilatory Parameter: Respiratory Rate -- Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate (Breaths/Minute) at All Timepoints up to Day 3 (72 Hours) and at Day 28
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28

Ventilatory parameter: Change from baseline in respiratory rate (breaths/minute) at all timepoints up to Day 3 (72 hours) and at Day 28.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

Respiratory rate is the number of breaths taken per minute.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
Ventilatory Parameter: Dynamic Compliance -- Change From Baseline in Dynamic Compliance (mL/cmH2O) at All Timepoints up to Day 3 (72 Hours) and at Day 28
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28

Ventilatory parameter: Change from baseline in dynamic compliance (mL/cmH2O) at all timepoints up to Day 3 (72 hours) and at Day 28.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

Dynamic compliance: is the continuous measurement of pulmonary compliance calculated at each point representing schematic changes during rhythmic breathing. Dynamic compliance monitors both elastic and airway resistance.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
Ventilatory Parameter: Static Compliance -- Change From Baseline in Static Compliance (mL/cmH2O) at All Timepoints up to Day 3 (72 Hours) and at Day 28
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28

Ventilatory parameter: static compliance -- change from baseline in static compliance (mL/cmH2O) at all timepoints up to Day 3 (72 hours) and at Day 28.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

At each time point the number of patients that contributed with a result value is indicated for both study arms.

Static Compliance: represents pulmonary compliance at a given fixed volume when there is no airflow, and muscles are relaxed.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
Ventilatory Parameter: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) -- Change From Baseline in PEEP (cmH2O) at All Timepoints up to Day 3 (72 Hours) and at Day 28
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28

Ventilatory parameter: Positive End-Expiratory Pressure -- Change from baseline in PEEP (cmH2O) at all timepoints up to Day 3 (72 hours) and at Day 28.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

At each time point the number of patients that contributed with a result value is indicated for both study arms.

Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is the positive pressure that will remain in the airways at the end of the respiratory cycle (end of exhalation) that is greater than the atmospheric pressure in mechanically ventilated patients.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
Ventilatory Parameter: Peak Inspiratory Pressure -- Change From Baseline in Peak Inspiratory Pressure (cmH2O) at All Timepoints up to Day 3 (72 Hours) and at Day 28
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28

Ventilatory parameter: Peak Inspiratory Pressure -- Change from baseline in peak inspiratory pressure (cmH2O) at all timepoints up to Day 3 (72 hours) and at Day 28.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

At each time point the number of patients that contributed with a result value is indicated for both study arms.

Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) is the highest level of pressure applied to the lungs during inhalation. In mechanical ventilation the number reflects a positive pressure in centimetres of water pressure (cmH2O).

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation and Day 28
Ventilatory Parameter: Plateau Pressure -- Change From Baseline in Plateau Pressure (cmH2O) at All Timepoints up to Day 3 (72 Hours) and at Day 28
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28

Ventilatory parameter: Plateau Pressure -- Change from baseline in plateau pressure (cmH2O) at all timepoints up to Day 3 (72 hours) and at Day 28.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

At each time point the number of patients that contributed with a result value is indicated for both study arms.

Plateau pressure is the pressure that is applied by the mechanical ventilator to the small airways and alveoli.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28
Blood Gas Analysis Acid-base Balance Parameters: Change From Baseline in Blood Gas Analysis Acid-base Balance Parameters -- pH
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28

Change from baseline in blood gas analysis acid-base balance parameters -- pH.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

Arterial blood gas was measured at 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60 and 72 hours after randomisation and up to Day 28 or till the patient was discharged from the ICU - whichever occurred earlier.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28
Change From Baseline in Blood Gas Analysis Acid-base Balance Parameter -- Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide (pCO2)
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28

Change from baseline in blood gas analysis acid-base balance parameter -- pCO2.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

Arterial blood gas was measured at 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60 and 72 hours after randomisation and up to Day 28 or till the patient was discharged from the ICU - whichever occurred earlier.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28
Change From Baseline in Blood Gas Analysis Acid-base Balance Parameter -- Partial Pressure of Oxygen (pO2)
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28

Change from baseline in blood gas analysis acid-base balance parameter -- pO2.

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

Arterial blood gas was measured at 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60 and 72 hours after randomisation and up to Day 28 or till the patient was discharged from the ICU - whichever occurred earlier.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28
Change From Baseline in Blood Gas Analysis Acid-base Balance Parameter -- Bicarbonate (HCO3)
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28

Change from baseline in blood gas analysis acid-base balance parameter -- Bicarbonate (HCO3).

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

Measured at 6-12-24h after each poractant alfa administration up to 72 hours and at similar timepoints in the control group (6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60 and 72 hours after randomisation) and then every 24 hours till the patient is discharged from the ICU

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28
Change From Baseline in Blood Parameter -- Lactate
Time Frame: up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28

Change from baseline in blood parameter -- Lactate

The change was calculated from two time points as the value at the later time point minus the value at baseline.

At each time point the number of patients that contributed with a result value is indicated for both study arms.

Arterial blood lactate was measured at 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, and 72 hours after randomisation and up to Day 28 or till the patient was discharged from the ICU - whichever occurred earlier.

up to 28 days: 6, 12, 24, 30, 36, 48, 54, 60, 72 hours after randomisation, and Day 28
Mortality -- TEAEs Leading to Death
Time Frame: up to day 28
The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAEs) leading to death is presented by treatment group.
up to day 28

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline in lowest and dynamic surface tensions (mN/m) from Tracheal Aspirate (TA) samples
Time Frame: at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs after start of treatment (first dose in the poractant alfa group) or after randomisation (in the control group)
exploratory endpoint for UK patients only
at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs after start of treatment (first dose in the poractant alfa group) or after randomisation (in the control group)
Change from baseline in concentrations of surfactant phospholipids (mg/ml) from TA samples
Time Frame: at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs after start of treatment (first dose in the poractant alfa group) or after randomisation (in the control group)
exploratory endpoint for UK patients only
at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs after start of treatment (first dose in the poractant alfa group) or after randomisation (in the control group)
Change from baseline in concentrations of proteins (ng/ml) from TA samples
Time Frame: at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs after start of treatment (first dose in the poractant alfa group) or after randomisation (in the control group)
exploratory endpoint for UK patients only
at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs after start of treatment (first dose in the poractant alfa group) or after randomisation (in the control group)
Change from baseline in inflammatory indices such as cellular and cytokine (pg/ml) inflammatory markers (e.g. IL-1, IL-6, TNF alpha, IFN gamma, and lymphocyte markers) from TA and blood samples
Time Frame: at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs after start of treatment (first dose in the poractant alfa group) or after randomisation (in the control group)
exploratory endpoint for UK patients only
at 12, 24, 48, 72 and 96 hrs after start of treatment (first dose in the poractant alfa group) or after randomisation (in the control group)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Clark Howard, Prof. /MD, University College, London

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 6, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 17, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 3, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 6, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 23, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 31, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on CUROSURF® (poractant alfa)

3
Subscribe