Health Education Delivery Methods for a Low Fermentable Carbohydrate Diet in Patients With Functional Bowel Disorders

February 25, 2019 updated by: King's College London

A Feasibility Study on Different Health Education Delivery Methods for a Low Fermentable Carbohydrate (FODMAP) Diet in Patients With Functional Bowel Disorders

There is evidence for the use of a diet low in short chain fermentable carbohydrates (low FODMAP diet) in the management of functional gut symptoms, such as abdominal pain and bloating. However, the provision of advice on the low FODMAP diet can be challenging due to limited resources and the need for a dietitian with expertise in the low FODMAP diet. The aim of this study is to assess the feasibility in terms of recruitment and retention in planning a future trial. The purpose of the future trial will be to investigate the clinical and cost effectiveness, as well as the acceptability of different education methods of the low FODMAP diet for the treatment of IBS.

To date, there are no studies on the implementation of the low FOMDAP diet using a mobile app or leaflets in the education of the low FODMAP diet. Therefore, a feasibility study design was chosen in order to obtain key data on recruitment and retention rates at each study group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A low FODMAP diet includes FODMAP restriction, FODMAP re-introduction and FODMAP personalisation. This study will focus on FODMAP restriction whereby foods high in FODMAPs are avoided for 4 weeks.

Patients with IBS will be recruited from primary and secondary care centres.

STUDY GROUPS

Group 1: 2 x Booklets produced produced by the Department of Nutrition and Dietetic in Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, and the Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division at King's College London. These booklets have been produced by dietitians and are commonly used in clinical practice across the UK. They contain the following information:

Group 2: Patients will be asked to download an application on their mobile phones or tablets. This application has been produced by dietitians from the Department of Nutrition and Dietetic in Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, and the Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division at King's College London.

Group 3:Patients will attend a clinic visit for a one-to-one consultation with a dietitian. As per current clinical practice, the initial visit will last for 1 hour.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVE The primary objective is to estimate recruitment and retention rates of patients with IBS receiving different education delivery methods of the low FODMAP diet.

SAMPLE SIZE As this is a feasibility study, a formal sample size calculation is not appropriate. For such feasibility studies, sample sizes between 24 and 50 have been recommended. Therefore, for this study, a total sample size of 45 was chosen (15 patients per group). Previous work indicates an approximately 12% attrition rate and, therefore, the final sample size will be 50 patients.

ANALYSIS Descriptive statistics such as mean values, standard deviations (SD) for continuous variables, and counts (percentages) and confidence intervals (CI) for categorical variables will be calculated. To assess recruitment and retention rates the following will be recorded: number of people directly contacting the researchers for the study, number of participants pre-screened and screened, number of participants randomised, number of drop-outs.

ETHICS AND REGULATORY APPROVALS The trial will be conducted in compliance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (1996), the principles of Good Clinical Practice. Ethical approval for this study has been granted by an NRES Committee London.

DATA HANDLING

The Chief Investigator will act as custodian for the trial data. The following guidelines will be strictly adhered to:

  1. Patient data will be anonymised
  2. All trial data will be stored on a password protected computer and limited to authorised study personnel
  3. All records and samples will be stored in a secure environment
  4. All trial data will be stored in line with the Data Protection Act
  5. Data and samples will be securely stored for 5 years after the study has ended and may be used for further in depth analysis
  6. Data may be accessed by regulatory authorities for audit purposes

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

51

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • London, United Kingdom, SE1 9NH
        • King's College London

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Men and women aged 18 or over with IBS, functional diarrhoea or functional bloating based on Rome IV criteria who do not have a major medical condition (diabetes, psychiatric or current eating disorders), gastrointestinal disease (e.g. inflammatory bowel disease, coeliac disease) or history of previous GI surgery, except cholecystectomy and haemorrhoidectomy
  2. Individuals with no adequate relief of their symptoms at baseline, as well as those with frequency of abdominal pain or discomfort for 1 or more days/week.
  3. Individuals with a BMI of 18.5 kgm2 or more.
  4. Individuals able to give informed consent
  5. Individuals able to understand English
  6. Individuals able to read English
  7. Individuals with access to Internet
  8. Individuals with smartphone with Android or IOS (Apple) software who are able to download apps.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Females who report to be pregnant or lactating
  2. Individuals with constipation predominant IBS (IBS-C) based on the Rome IV criteria
  3. Consumption of antibiotics, in the last 4 weeks prior to the study
  4. Individuals with additional specific dietary needs (based on the dietitian's judgment)
  5. Individuals with multiple food allergies
  6. Individuals who have participated in other trials with investigational products within 3 months prior to screening

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Booklets
Health education delivery method: Booklet. Patients will be given 2 leaflets on the low FOMDAP diet produced by the Department of Nutrition and Dietetic in Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, and the Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division at King's College London. These booklets have been produced by dietitians and are commonly used in clinical practice across the UK.
Experimental: Mobile application
Health education delivery method: Mobile application. Patients will be asked to download an application on their mobile phones or tablets. This application has been produced by dietitians from the Department of Nutrition and Dietetic in Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, and the Diabetes and Nutritional Sciences Division at King's College London.
Active Comparator: One to one consultation with dietitian
Health education delivery method:One-to-one consultation with dietitian. Patients will attend a clinic visit for a one-to-one consultation with a dietitian. As per current clinical practice, the initial visit will last for 1 hour. During the visit, tailored information on the low FOMDAP diet will be given to match patients' individual needs. During the visit, either the leaflets (used in group 1) or the application (used in group 2) will be used to facilitate the visit. The choice of using the leaflets or the app during the visit will be based on the dietitian's judgment based on the patients' needs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RECRUITMENT RATE
Time Frame: Baseline visit (Day 0)
Recruitment rate of patients receiving different education delivery methods of the low FODMAP diet.
Baseline visit (Day 0)
RETENTION RATE (overall and within each study group)
Time Frame: Follow-up visit (week 4)
Retention rate of patients receiving different education delivery methods of the low FODMAP diet.
Follow-up visit (week 4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance rates to the diet
Time Frame: Follow-up visit (week 4)
Compliance rates to the diet within the study groups assessed via a 7day food and drink diary
Follow-up visit (week 4)
Satisfaction over the education delivery methods received
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Satisfaction over the education methods and diet, assessed via 5-point Likert scales (1=Strongly Agree, 2=Agree, 3=Neutral, 4=Disagree, 5=Strongly Disagree)
Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Appropriateness of the education methods received in each study group
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Perceived appropriateness of the education methods, assessed via 5-point Likert scales (1=Strongly Agree, 2=Agree, 3=Neutral, 4=Disagree, 5=Strongly Disagree)
Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Perceived fit of the education delivery methods within the NHS
Time Frame: Follow-up visit (week 4)
Assessed via a 5-point Likert scale (1=Strongly Agree, 2=Agree, 3=Neutral, 4=Disagree, 5=Strongly Disagree)
Follow-up visit (week 4)
Willingness of participants being assigned to the study groups using a multiple choice questionnaire.
Time Frame: Follow-up visit (week 4)
Assessed via a question on whether they would like to have been randomised to a different group (Yes/No)
Follow-up visit (week 4)
Gastrointestinal symptom severity
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Validated Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS) questionnaire. The questionnaire includes four VAS items evaluating abdominal pain frequency and intensity, abdominal distension, satisfaction with bowel habit, and quality of life. Scores are then added up; scoring allows categorisation of patients into mild (75-174), moderate (175-300) and severe (>300) cases, with a maximum achievable severity score of 500 points. A minimal clinically important difference of a 50-point reduction in score allows meaningful interpretation of score change over time.
Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Health-related quality of life in irritable bowel syndrome
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Validated Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Quality of Life (IBS-QoL) questionnaire. Each item utilises a 5-point Likert response scale, which is transformed to a 0-100 point scale and subscale scores are then calculated (dysphoria, interference with activity, body image, health worry, food avoidance, social reaction, sexual, relationships). A total score can be calculated by summing the subscale scores. A score of 100 denotes maximum QOL for subscales and the total score.
Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Gastrointestinal symptoms experienced
Time Frame: Baseline and follow-up visitBaseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Assessed using Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS). Gastrointestinal symptoms (Abdominal discomfort or pain, Heartburn, Acid reflux, nausea, abdominal gurgling, bloating, burping, flatulence, constipation, diarrhoea, loos stools, hard stools, urgency, incomplete evacuation, tiredness, overall symptoms) are rated in a 4-point Likert scale (0=Absent, 1=Mild, 2=Moderate, 3=Severe). Descriptive and inferential statistical results are presented for each individual symptom seperately.
Baseline and follow-up visitBaseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Adequate relief of symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Assessed using the "adequate relief of IBS symptoms" question (IBS-AR). The outcome is dischotomous (Yes/No) and counts/percentages that have reported adequate relief ("Yes") will be presented.
Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
Estimates of the parameters required for calculation of the sample size for a future larger study
Time Frame: Screening (Week -1), Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)
The results of this study will be used to inform the sample size calculation of a future larger study if needed. The outcome that will be used for the sample size calculation depends on the which the primary outcome of the future study will be. The mean and standard deviation generated from this study will be used for the sample size of the future trial.
Screening (Week -1), Baseline (Day 0) and Follow-up visit (week 4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Miranda Lomer, PhD, King's College London

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 3, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

October 25, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 3, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2019

Last Verified

July 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Health education delivery methods

3
Subscribe