- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03702647
Ropivacaine For Post-POEM Pain Control
January 25, 2021 updated by: Lawrence Charles Hookey
POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) is an endoscopic procedure most commonly used to treat achalasia.
Achalasia is a disorder resulting from the inability of esophageal muscles to relax.The POEM procedure, performed under general anesthesia, involves inserting an endoscope into the esophagus where a specialized knife is able to cut a new pathway through the esophageal tissue.
The knife is then used to incise, and therefore loosen, tight muscles within the esophagus, lower esophageal sphincter, and the upper region of the stomach that are responsible for the symptoms.This study seeks to improve patient's post-operative pain levels by placing ropivacaine (a local anesthetic) into the newly cut pathway that is created in the POEM procedure.
It is hypothesized that the topical irrigation of the POEM tunnel with ropivacaine will result in decreased pain scores and a decreased need for additional pain medications.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
POEM (Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy) is an endoscopic procedure most commonly used to treat achalasia.
Achalasia is a disorder resulting from the inability of esophageal muscles to relax.
Consequently, patients experience difficulty swallowing, reflux, and weight loss.
Treatment options for achalasia are generally divided into 2 categories: A) treatment with medication, or B) treatment via a procedure.
Medical treatment is generally reserved for patients to unwell to undergo procedures as the efficacy is low.
Additionally, patients tend to experience many side-effects.
There are also procedural options used to treat achalasia which include surgical myotomy and POEM.
The POEM procedure is advantageous because it is less invasive, but is at least as equally effective for symptomatic relief when compared to the surgical myotomy.
The POEM procedure, performed under general anesthesia, involves inserting an endoscope into the esophagus where a specialized knife is able to cut a new pathway through the esophageal tissue.
The knife is then used to incise, and therefore loosen, tight muscles within the esophagus, lower esophageal sphincter, and the upper region of the stomach that are responsible for the symptoms.
At the conclusion of the procedure, clips are placed in the esophagus to close the incision.
Currently, patients are given intravenous ketorolac, oral viscous lidocaine and narcotic analgesics as needed to manage post-operative pain.
This study, however, seeks to improve patient's post-operative pain levels by placing ropivacaine (a local anesthetic) into the newly cut pathway that is created in the POEM procedure.
It is hypothesized that the topical irrigation of the POEM tunnel with ropivacaine will result in decreased pain scores and a decreased need for additional pain medications.
Patients consented to participate in the study will be randomized to receive either ropivacaine (intervention group) or saline (control group).
Pain will be assessed at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 6 hours post-admission to the recovery unit using validated pain scales.
Additionally, the Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) patient survey, will be completed prior to discharge.
This measure will capture the patient's initial post-operative health condition and help capture the overall patient experience.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ontario
-
Kingston, Ontario, Canada, K7L 5G2
- Kingston Health Sciences Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age and older undergoing POEM procedure
- Able to provide written informed consent
- Fluent and literate in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with known adverse reactions to local anesthetics and NSAIDs (GFR<50)
- Patients with chronic pain taking regular analgesics or narcotics (requiring daily opioid therapy > 30 mg morphine or equivalents)
- Patients unable to give informed consent
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Ropivacaine
30mL of 0.2% Ropivacaine placed in the POEM tunnel
|
30mL of 0.2% Ropivacaine placed in the POEM tunnel
|
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Normal Saline
30mL of normal saline placed in the POEM tunnel
|
30mL of normal saline placed in the POEM tunnel
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-POEM pain level
Time Frame: 6 hours post-POEM procedure
|
To assess the effect of the intervention/placebo on pain 6-hours post-POEM as assessed via the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS): The patient will be asked to rate their pain on a scale of 0-10, 0 representing no pain, and 10 representing the worst pain they have ever felt in their life.
|
6 hours post-POEM procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-POEM pain level
Time Frame: 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 hours post-POEM procedure
|
Assessing pain scores at 0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 hours post-POEM and on discharge
|
0, 0.5, 1, 2, 4 hours post-POEM procedure
|
|
Quality of Recovery (QoR-15) score on the day of discharge
Time Frame: Assessed up to 24 hours post-POEM procedure
|
Quality of Recovery-15 score: This survey captures patient's initial post-operative health condition and their overall patient experience.
The patient will be asked to rate various emotional and physical aspects of their post-operative condition on a scale of 0-10.
0 will represent an emotion or activity experienced or accomplished none of the time, and 10 will represent an emotion or activity accomplished all of the time.
Scores are summed; higher scores indicate a more optimal post-operative condition.
|
Assessed up to 24 hours post-POEM procedure
|
|
Post-POEM analgesic
Time Frame: 0 -6 hours post-procedure
|
The requirement of post-POEM analgesic
|
0 -6 hours post-procedure
|
|
Adverse Events
Time Frame: Assessed up to 24 hours post-POEM procedure
|
Adverse events in hospital
|
Assessed up to 24 hours post-POEM procedure
|
|
Fentanyl consumption
Time Frame: Intra-procedure
|
Intraprocedural fentanyl consumption
|
Intra-procedure
|
|
Repeatability of procedure
Time Frame: Assessed 24 hours post-POEM procedure
|
Patient's willingness to have the procedure done on an outpatient basis: Patients will be asked if they are "willing" or "not willing" to have the procedure done on an outpatient basis.
|
Assessed 24 hours post-POEM procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert Bechara, M.D., Queens University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Scott DB, Lee A, Fagan D, Bowler GM, Bloomfield P, Lundh R. Acute toxicity of ropivacaine compared with that of bupivacaine. Anesth Analg. 1989 Nov;69(5):563-9.
- Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
- Sadowski DC, Ackah F, Jiang B, Svenson LW. Achalasia: incidence, prevalence and survival. A population-based study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2010 Sep;22(9):e256-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2010.01511.x. Epub 2010 May 11.
- Samo S, Carlson DA, Gregory DL, Gawel SH, Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. Incidence and Prevalence of Achalasia in Central Chicago, 2004-2014, Since the Widespread Use of High-Resolution Manometry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Mar;15(3):366-373. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.08.030. Epub 2016 Aug 28.
- Goyal RK, Chaudhury A. Physiology of normal esophageal motility. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2008 May-Jun;42(5):610-9. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0b013e31816b444d.
- Goyal RK, Chaudhury A. Pathogenesis of achalasia: lessons from mutant mice. Gastroenterology. 2010 Oct;139(4):1086-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Aug 25. No abstract available.
- Clark SB, Rice TW, Tubbs RR, Richter JE, Goldblum JR. The nature of the myenteric infiltrate in achalasia: an immunohistochemical analysis. Am J Surg Pathol. 2000 Aug;24(8):1153-8. doi: 10.1097/00000478-200008000-00014.
- Robertson CS, Martin BA, Atkinson M. Varicella-zoster virus DNA in the oesophageal myenteric plexus in achalasia. Gut. 1993 Mar;34(3):299-302. doi: 10.1136/gut.34.3.299.
- Castagliuolo I, Brun P, Costantini M, Rizzetto C, Palu G, Costantino M, Baldan N, Zaninotto G. Esophageal achalasia: is the herpes simplex virus really innocent? J Gastrointest Surg. 2004 Jan;8(1):24-30; discussion 30. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2003.10.004.
- Niwamoto H, Okamoto E, Fujimoto J, Takeuchi M, Furuyama J, Yamamoto Y. Are human herpes viruses or measles virus associated with esophageal achalasia? Dig Dis Sci. 1995 Apr;40(4):859-64. doi: 10.1007/BF02064992.
- Birgisson S, Galinski MS, Goldblum JR, Rice TW, Richter JE. Achalasia is not associated with measles or known herpes and human papilloma viruses. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Feb;42(2):300-6. doi: 10.1023/a:1018805600276.
- Verne GN, Sallustio JE, Eaker EY. Anti-myenteric neuronal antibodies in patients with achalasia. A prospective study. Dig Dis Sci. 1997 Feb;42(2):307-13. doi: 10.1023/a:1018857617115.
- Kallel-Sellami M, Karoui S, Romdhane H, Laadhar L, Serghini M, Boubaker J, Lahmar H, Filali A, Makni S. Circulating antimyenteric autoantibodies in Tunisian patients with idiopathic achalasia. Dis Esophagus. 2013 Nov-Dec;26(8):782-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2050.2012.01398.x. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
- Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Vela MF. ACG clinical guideline: diagnosis and management of achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug;108(8):1238-49; quiz 1250. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.196. Epub 2013 Jul 23.
- Schlottmann F, Herbella F, Allaix ME, Patti MG. Modern management of esophageal achalasia: From pathophysiology to treatment. Curr Probl Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):10-37. doi: 10.1067/j.cpsurg.2018.01.001. Epub 2018 Jan 31. No abstract available. Erratum In: Curr Probl Surg. 2019 Feb;56(2):91.
- Schlottmann F, Luckett DJ, Fine J, Shaheen NJ, Patti MG. Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy Versus Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for Achalasia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):451-460. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002311.
- Ujiki MB, Yetasook AK, Zapf M, Linn JG, Carbray JM, Denham W. Peroral endoscopic myotomy: A short-term comparison with the standard laparoscopic approach. Surgery. 2013 Oct;154(4):893-7; discussion 897-900. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.04.042.
- de La Coussaye JE, Eledjam JJ, Brugada J, Sassine A. [Cardiotoxicity of local anesthetics]. Cah Anesthesiol. 1993;41(6):589-98. French.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
June 1, 2019
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
December 1, 2020
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
January 18, 2021
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 4, 2018
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 10, 2018
First Posted (ACTUAL)
October 11, 2018
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
January 26, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 25, 2021
Last Verified
January 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Digestive System Diseases
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
- Esophageal Motility Disorders
- Deglutition Disorders
- Esophageal Diseases
- Esophageal Achalasia
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Anesthetics, Local
- Ropivacaine
Other Study ID Numbers
- DMED -2186-18
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Achalasia
-
Federico II UniversityRecruitingAchalasia | Indocyanine Green | Indocyanine Green (ICG) | Achalasia, EsophagealItaly
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingAchalasia | Achalasia CardiaEgypt
-
Mayo ClinicTerminatedAchalasia | Esophageal Achalasia | Achalasia, EsophagealUnited States
-
Federico II UniversityCompleted
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaCompleted
-
The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou UniversityRecruitingDysphagia | Cricopharyngeal AchalasiaChina
-
Baylor College of MedicineRecruitingEsophageal Motility Disorders | AchalasiaUnited States
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalCompleted
-
Zeng ChanghaoRecruitingCricopharyngeal AchalasiaTaiwan
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)RecruitingType I Achalasia | Type II Achalasia | EGJ Outflow Obstruction Without Spastic/Hypercontractile FeaturesUnited States
Clinical Trials on Ropivacaine
-
Northern Jiangsu People's HospitalNot yet recruiting
-
Peking University First HospitalCompletedEpidural Analgesia | Labor Pain | Dexmedetomidine | Esketamine | Ropivacaine | SufentanilChina
-
Beijing Tiantan HospitalRecruiting
-
Sahiwal medical college sahiwalCompletedBradycardia | Post Operative Analgesia | Opioid Sparing Anaesthesia | Hypotension, Controlled | Stoma Reversal ProcedurePakistan
-
Fudan UniversityNot yet recruitingBreast Neoplasms | Anesthesia, Local | Surgical Procedures, Operative | Pulmonary Ventilation | Intercostal Nerve Block
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyRecruitingNerve Block | Ropivacaine | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Total Knee AnthroplastyChina
-
Ziekenhuis Oost-LimburgRecruitingAnesthesia | Hallux ValgusBelgium
-
University of California, San FranciscoRecruitingAdolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis (AIS) | Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis | Neuromuscular ScoliosisUnited States
-
Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityRecruitingAnalgesia | Liposomal Bupivacaine | Preperitoneal InfiltrationChina
-
University Health Network, TorontoUnknownPIB Versus CI Through a Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheter for Analgesia Following Major Ankle SurgeryPain, PostoperativeCanada