Study on the Effects of Different Premedication for LISA on Stress and Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation in Preterm Infants (SAFE LISA)

July 29, 2021 updated by: Dr. Ilia Bresesti, ASST Fatebenefratelli Sacco

A Single-centre, Randomized Pilot Study on the Effects of Different Premedication Treatments for Less Invasive Surfactant Administration (LISA) on Pain, Cerebral Tissue Oxygenation and Cortisol Levels in Preterm Infants

Given the popularity that LISA technique has gainig in worldwide neonatal units, the lack of evidence regarding its premedication is becoming even more relevant to provide the best care to premature infants.

Objective of this clinical trial is to establish the best premedication for LISA procedure considering neonatal pain assessed with premature infants pain scale, salivary cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and crSO2 values as indicators of cerebral oxygenation. Moreover, we aim to verify if sucrose 24% given orally is an effective tool for pain management in preterm neonates also in more invasive procedure, comparable to pharmacological treatment.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the last decades, one of the most relevant interventions which have led to a significant increase in preterm infants survival rate is the introduction of surfactant replacement therapy.

Nowadays, given the trend towards the less invasive respiratory support also for low and extremely low gestational age infants, the use of intubation and prolonged mechanical ventilation has been minimized. In fact, bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) has been proved to be closely related to prolonged intubation and it is one of the main problem clinicians must face with. This is the reason why the INSURE technique was introduced as a routine care procedure in neonatal units. In fact, INSURE is the acronym for INtubation - SURfactant administration-Extubation. This technique ensures the baby the positive effects of surfactant on respiratory mechanics minimizing the intubation length. However, the INSURE procedure still involves intubation, meaning that it is still invansive and some infants cannot be extubated immediately afterward. Thus, lately new technique for surfactant administration has been introduced. The most extensively studied are the so-called less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) and minimally invasive surfactant therapy (MIST). With these procedures, infants receive non-invasive continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment, while being given intratracheal surfactant via a feeding tube or small catheter. Although the paucity of literature available to date, for extremely preterm infants LISA has shown to be able to reduce the need for intubation, ventilation and supplemental oxygen when compared with the standard technique of rescue intubation and ventilation. In comparison with the INSURE procedure the less invasive surfactant administration was associated with a reduced need for ventilation and reduced risk of BPD.

Even if this technique can provide the gentlest treatment presently available in administering surfactant, it implies laryngoscopy and somewhat discomfort. The importance of proper care in managing preterm infants, especially during painful procedures, has been well demonstrated and all the caregivers have to be even more committed to this aspect.

Pain in neonates is usually assessed through pain scales and using clinical parameters such as pulse oximetry (SatO2) and Heart Rate (HR). Since pain scores are subject to caregivers' individual perception and parameters can be influenced by other clinical underlying condition, especially in preterm infants, determination of cortisol concentration could be a useful alternative.

Cortisol is the major glucocorticoid produced in the adrenal cortex. Cortisol production has a circadian rhythm, with levels peaking in the early morning and dropping to lowest values at night. Levels rise independently of circadian rhythm in response to stress.

There is convincing evidence that providing neonates with oral glucose during painful procedure reduces the stress related to the procedure itself, without serious side effects or harms related to this intervention. Different concentrations of glucose solution are currently available and have been used in neonatal field.

To date, there is still high debate on the need to provide sedation to babies undergoing LISA, and lack of evidence available regarding the optimal premedication. Some Authors report to use LISA technique without any sort of sedation, while others perform it with the same sedation they use for INSURE method.

Moreover, there is lack of evidence in regard to the effects of this method on cerebral oxygenation, which can be easily monitored using NIRS (near infrared spectroscopy).

Since LISA technique's popularity is increasing, we believe that there is urgent need to better clarify how this approach can be performed in the gentlest way.

Given these premises, we indeed speculate that oral glucose as a premedication for LISA procedure could be an intriguing alternative to standard sedation.

Objective of this clinical trial is to establish the best premedication for LISA procedure considering neonatal pain assessed with premature infants pain scale, salivary cortisol levels as an indicator of stress and crSO2 values as indicators of cerebral oxygenation. Moreover, we aim to verify if sucrose 24% given orally is an effective tool for pain management in preterm neonates also in more invasive procedure, comparable to pharmacological treatment.

Evaluation of the efficacy of non-pharmacological sedation will lead to:

  • a gentler approach for preterm babies and a better understanding of LISA technique
  • an improvement in pain management, where sucrose can be applied for several painful procedures of different degrees of invasiveness, not only in the mildest ones
  • a significant reduction in prolonged ventilation due to surfactant administration's pharmacological sedation
  • a safer use of surfactant administration also in level II neonatal unit, since the risk for subsequent need of invasive respiratory support due to excessive sedation would be considerably reduced
  • a significant economic impact on public health care system, for the inferior cost of oral sucrose
  • a relevant decrease of the onset and subsequent public cost of BPD, if data about LISA technique capability to reduce it will be further confirmed.
  • Primary Outcome:

Verify which is the best premedication for LISA procedure to reduce neonatal pain.

  • Secondary Outcomes:
  • Verify the effects of different forms of premedication on cerebral oxygenation during LISA procedure
  • Verify the effects of different forms of premedication on cortisol levels before and after LISA procedure
  • Verify the efficacy of sucrose 24% in pain control during more invasive procedures
  • Verify the influence of premedication on adverse events' occurrence during LISA procedure
  • Verify the effects of different pre-medications on the ease in administering surfactant with LISA technique (time required, number of attempts, …)

Trial Design:

An investigator-initiated randomized, single center, pilot study that will enroll 20 preterm neonates between 27 and 29+6 weeks of gestation.

Multiple births will be randomised into the same treatment arm.

Trial Interventions:

  • Study group 1: patients will receive atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes) before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure
  • Study group 2: patients will be given atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and oral sucrose 24% (0.5 ml) 2 minutes before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure.

All the procedure will be videorecorded and subsequently analyzed

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

11 months to 11 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Preterm neonate 27-29+6 weeks AND
  • Need for non-invasive respiratory support (CPAP or nHFT) AND
  • Need for surfactant according to the unit guidelines AND
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • No written informed consent and/or
  • Severe malformation of the upper/lower airways, brain and/or heart and/or lung and/or prenatal cerebral injury.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: GROUP Fentanyl
patients will receive atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes) before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure, which will be video-recorded.
atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and fentanyl (0.5-2 mcg/kg i.v. in 5 minutes)
Other Names:
  • atropine
Experimental: GROUP Sucrose
patients will be given atropine (0.01-0.02 mg/kg i.v. bolus) and oral sucrose 24% (0.5 ml) 2 minutes before LISA in addition to standard care (wrapping). NIRS will be monitored during the whole procedure, which will be video-recorded.
0.5 ml given orally 2 minutes before LISA procedure
Other Names:
  • atropine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PIPP SCALE score
Time Frame: during the LISA procedure
Verify which is the best premedication for LISA procedure to reduce neonatal pain.
during the LISA procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

May 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 20, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 20, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 23, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 23, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 24, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 29, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Fentanyl

3
Subscribe