Role of Magnesium in Pediatric Cochlear Implant

October 25, 2019 updated by: Wahba bakhet

Combination of Magnesium Sulphate With Total Intravenous Anesthesia Optimized Surgical Field in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Surgery

To determine the efficiency of addition of magnesium sulfate to total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) in optimizing the surgical field during pediatric cochlear implant surgery. Also its effects on the intraoperative evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (ESRT) and the intraoperative anesthetic requirements were evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Sixty-six ASA I and II children (1-6 years) undergoing cochlear implantation under general anesthesia were enrolled in this double blind, randomized study. Children were randomly allocated into two equal groups. Children in Group M (magnesium sulphate group) received an iv bolus dose of magnesium sulfate 40 mg Kg-1 over 5 minutes before induction of anesthesia followed by 15mg Kg-1 h-1 infusion until the start of skin closure. Children in Group C (Control group) received equivalent volumes of isotonic saline solution over the same period instead of magnesium sulphate. Haemodynamic variables, quality of surgical field, ESRT and the intraoperative anesthetic requirements were recorded

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

66

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I and II children

Exclusion Criteria:

  • uncontrolled hypertension,
  • diabetes mellitus,
  • liver disease,
  • kidney disease,
  • heart disease,
  • allergy to magnesium sulphate,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: SUPPORTIVE_CARE
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Magnesium sulphate
Group M
Before induction of anesthesia; children in group M received an iv bolus dose of magnesium sulfate (Magnesium sulfate ampoule 1 gm/10 ml, Eipico, Egypt) 40 mg Kg-1 over 5 minutes followed by 15 mg Kg-1 h-1 ivi until the start of skin closure.
Other Names:
  • MGSO4
Placebo Comparator: Na CL 0.9%
group C
Before induction of anesthesia; children in group C equivalent volumes of Na Cl 0.9% over the same period instead of magnesium sulphate.
Other Names:
  • isotonic saline solution

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of surgical field
Time Frame: at the end of the surgey
using Fromme's-Boezaart scale (0 to 5). A score of ≤ 2 was considered to be optimal
at the end of the surgey

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The operative time
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Minutes
Intraoperative
The anesthesia time.
Time Frame: Intraoperative
Minutes
Intraoperative
ESRT responses
Time Frame: After insertion of the electrode and after reversal of any residual muscle relaxant (TOF response > 0.9),
the surgeon assessed ESRT response at the basal, middle, and apical areas of the electrode array by visual monitoring of the stapedius muscle using direct microscopic examination
After insertion of the electrode and after reversal of any residual muscle relaxant (TOF response > 0.9),
Heart rate
Time Frame: baseline, after surgical incision, Hypotensive period, after LMA removal and at recovery room admission.
beats per minute
baseline, after surgical incision, Hypotensive period, after LMA removal and at recovery room admission.
Mean arterial blood pressure
Time Frame: Intraoperative
mm Hg
Intraoperative
Anesthetic consumption
Time Frame: Intraoperative
propofol and fentanyl requirement after the bolus
Intraoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 29, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2019

Last Verified

October 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Magnesium sulphate

3
Subscribe