The Influence of Skin-to-skin Contact on Cortical Activity During Painful Procedures on Preterm Infants in the NICU (iCAPmini)

November 19, 2018 updated by: Marsha Campbell-Yeo, IWK Health Centre

iCAP Mini - The Influence of Skin-to-skin Contact on Cortical Activity During Painful Procedures on Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit: A Randomized Control Trial

The aim of this study is to examine the effect of SSC compared to sucrose on pain induced activity in the preterm infant brain using: a) series of low intensity experimental stimuli (PinPrick);and b) medically required heel lance. Secondary objectives include determining: a) differences between behavioral pain response and pain response during heel lance; and b) rate of adverse events across groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Hospitalized preterm infants undergo an average of 12 painful procedures daily, with less than half receiving pain relief. Poorly treated early pain can have long lasting negative effects that impact later learning, development, and reaction to future pain, stress, and emotional experiences. While sweet tasting solution (sucrose) is considered the standard of care for reducing behavioral responses to acute procedural pain in preterm infants, some evidence that sucrose may not similarly reduce pain related brain activity raises concerns regarding the degree of pain relieving effect. This concern is especially relevant as the use of sucrose to manage repeated acute pain has not been found to prevent heightened later pain associated with this exposure. Strong evidence suggests that maternal infant skin-to-skin contact (SSC) is effective in reducing behavioral responses to pain. Given the multi-sensory benefits of SSC, it is highly likely that SSC provided during pain in early life may reduce pain induced brain activity.

Infants ( n=126) (32 to 36 completed weeks gestational age) admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, and their mothers within the first seven days of age will be randomly assigned to receive: i) SSC or ii) 24 % oral sucrose. Each baby will receive both the PinPrick and heel lance, following a no treatment baseline period. The primary outcome is pain related brain activity measured using an electroencephalogram (EEG) pain-specific event-related potential. Secondary outcomes include pain intensity measured using a behavioural infant pain assessment tool (Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised) and rate of adverse events.

This will be the first study to examine the effect of SSC on pain induced brain activity in the preterm infant brain during experimental and clinical pain stimuli, measured using EEG. Given the negative neurodevelopmental outcomes associated with unmanaged pain, it is imperative that preterm infants receive the most effective pain relieving treatments to improve their health outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

126

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Nova Scotia
      • Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada, B3K 6R8

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 months to 8 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • stable neonates delivered between 32 and 36 completed weeks Gestational age (GA) at birth (Determination of stability will be made in consultation with the attending neonatal staff)
  • admitted to NICU
  • parents are able to read and write English
  • will be approached for inclusion within the first seven days following birth

Exclusion criteria:

  • major congenital anomalies
  • receiving or received opioids in 24 hours preceding heel lance
  • immediate post operative period (<72 hours) following surgery
  • history of hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy requiring cooling
  • contraindication for sucrose administration (e.g., unable to swallow, paralysis)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Skin-to-skin contact

Infants will be placed in full ventral skin-to-skin with their mother at least fifteen minutes prior to heel lance to allow time to settle and recover following transfer. Positioning will be determined based on individual maternal preference in order to optimize comfort as well as facilitate ease of access to the infant's foot for blood collection, while also attempting to minimize disruption of continuous EEG, heart rate, oxygen saturation, and video recording. Skin to skin contact will continue until the procedure is completed.

In addition, infants will be offered non-nutritive sucking using a gloved finger or pacifier (based on parental preference) during SSC. Whether infants are actively sucking during the procedure will be recorded by the research coordinator.

Infants allocated to the SSC arm will be placed in upright, ventral SSC position (holding of a diaper clad baby on the bare chest of a mother) for a minimum of 15 minutes prior to data collection.
Other Names:
  • Kangaroo care (maternal)
Active Comparator: 24% Oral sucrose

Infants will be placed in a cot or in an incubator, depending on their gestational age, for the duration of the blood collection. Administration of 0.12mls (0.04mls per drop) of 24 percent oral sucrose will occur two minutes prior to the heel lance.

The infants will be offered non-nutritive sucking using a gloved finger or pacifier (based on parental preference) immediately following administration of the complete 24 percent oral sucrose dose. Whether infants are actively sucking during the procedure will be recorded by the research coordinator.

Administration of 24 percent oral sucrose will occur two minutes prior to the heel lance.
Other Names:
  • sweet taste

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain-specific event related potential
Time Frame: Isolated within the one-minute window post-procedure at lead CZ
The primary outcome measure will be pain-specific brain activity measured using a dense array neonatal electroencephalogram (EEG) recording that is time-locked to a medically required heel lance. Infant EEG activity will be recorded from a HydroCel Geodesic Sensor Net positioned according to the modified international 10/20 electrode placement system on a 128 Channel Geodesic EEG SystemTM 400 MR series (Electrical Geodesics Incorporated, Eugene, Oregon, USA). Pain-specific event related potentials will specifically be examined and isolated at electrode sites Cz, as previous research has reported pain-specific activity at this site in both infants and adults.
Isolated within the one-minute window post-procedure at lead CZ

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Premature Infant Pain Profile-Revised
Time Frame: Composite pain scores with be averaged over 30 second epochs and reported at 30, 60, 90, 120 seconds post heel lance
The PIPP-R, which has been revised from the original PIPP developed 14 years ago, is a 7-indicator composite pain measure consisting of 3 behavioural (facial actions: brow bulge, eye squeeze, and naso-labial furrow), 2 physiological (heart rate, oxygen saturation) and 2 contextual (gestational age, behavioural state) indicators of acute pain. A numerical score ranging from 0 - 3 is assigned to each indicator for a maximum score of 18 reflecting the worst possible pain in infants born at greater than 36 weeks' gestational age. A score of 6 or less is considered to indicate minimal or no pain, a score of 6 to 12 indicates mild or moderate pain, and a score of 12 or greater indicates moderate to severe pain.
Composite pain scores with be averaged over 30 second epochs and reported at 30, 60, 90, 120 seconds post heel lance
Recovery
Time Frame: The point at which the preterm infant's heart rate reaches baseline levels and is sustained for no less than five to seven beats following the heel lance, time will vary across patients but will be anticipated to be no longer than 5 minutes
Time to recovery will be considered the amount of time in seconds that elapses until the infant's heart rate returns to baseline average values. The point at which the infant's heart rate reaches baseline levels and is sustained for no less than five to seven beats following the heel lance will indicate recovery.
The point at which the preterm infant's heart rate reaches baseline levels and is sustained for no less than five to seven beats following the heel lance, time will vary across patients but will be anticipated to be no longer than 5 minutes
Maternal acceptability: questionnaire
Time Frame: Immediately post-procedure
Mothers will be asked to complete an open-ended questionnaire with 3-5 questions (depending on assigned condition) following completion of the study procedures. This questionnaire will focus on assessing maternal acceptability of the use of the assigned skin to skin contact or sweet taste intervention as well as the use of neurocognitive imaging technology to measure newborn pain responding in the neonatal period.
Immediately post-procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marsha L Campbell-Yeo, PhD NNP, School of Nursing, Faculty of Health, Dalhousie University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 14, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IWKHealthC 1023060

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain, Acute

Clinical Trials on Skin-to-skin contact

3
Subscribe