Metacognition in Neurological Injury

January 10, 2024 updated by: University of Nebraska Lincoln

Longitudinal Examination of Metacognition in Neurological Samples

The purpose of this study is to investigate the trajectory of metacognitive functioning throughout phases of recovery from neurological insult, and to determine its relationship to rehabilitation compliance and functional outcome. It is hypothesized that metacognitive accuracy improves over time, and is a significant predictor of engagement in rehabilitation activities.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study will examine the trajectory of metacognitive functioning through different phases of recovery from neurological insult, and document its relationship to rehabilitation compliance. Individuals currently completing rehabilitation programs and individuals from the community who meet study criteria are invited to participate. After consenting and enrolling in the study, participants complete 2 study sessions: a baseline session, and a follow-up session either at time of completion of rehabilitation program or 3 months later if not in a rehabilitation program. During the study sessions, participants will complete paper-and-pencil and computerized tests of cognition (including metacognitive tasks).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Kathy Chiou, Ph.D.
  • Phone Number: 402-472-5843
  • Email: kchiou2@unl.edu

Study Locations

    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68588-0308
        • Recruiting
        • University of Nebraska-Lincoln
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

participants in rehabilitation facility and community-dwelling individuals

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • history of brain and/or spinal cord injury
  • no history of brain or neurological injury/insult (for healthy control group)
  • fluent in spoken and written English
  • adequate gross motor abilities to provide a button push on a keyboard

Exclusion Criteria:

  • exclusion criteria for healthy controls include:
  • current/past history of psychiatric illness
  • learning disorder
  • developmental disorder
  • diagnosis of Attention Deficit Disorder/Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Neurological injury
Paper and pencil/computerized assessments of cognitive functioning and metacognitive performance will be administered.
Paper and pencil/computerized tests of metacognition
Healthy control
Paper and pencil/computerized assessments of cognitive functioning and metacognitive performance will be administered.
Paper and pencil/computerized tests of metacognition

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from baseline metamemory performance to completion of rehabilitation
Time Frame: At baseline and at end of length of stay in rehabilitative setting (on average 3 months)
The computerized metamemory test produces scores that are used to calculate a gamma coefficient, which is a quantitative measure of the individual's metacognitive performance/accuracy.
At baseline and at end of length of stay in rehabilitative setting (on average 3 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in rehabilitative engagement
Time Frame: At baseline and at end of length of stay in rehabilitative setting (on average 3 months)
The rehabilitative engagement questionnaire is a clinician-report measure that queries the clinician's perception of their client's participation in rehabilitation services.
At baseline and at end of length of stay in rehabilitative setting (on average 3 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathy Chiou, Ph.D., University of Nebraska Lincoln

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 13, 2018

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

November 26, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 12, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Injuries

Clinical Trials on metacognitive performance

3
Subscribe