Bone Metabolic Activity in the Patellofemoral Joint in Patients With Unilateral PFP

May 27, 2022 updated by: Rudi Neergaard Hansen, University Hospital Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg

Study of Subchondral Bone Remodeling With 18F NaF-PET / CT in Patients With Patellofemoral Pain. A Substudy for: Comparative Effectiveness of Therapeutic Hip and Knee Exercise for Patellofemoral Pain: a Pragmatic Randomised Trial (the COMPETE Trial)

This study aims to examine whether individuals with unilateral patellofemoral pain (PFP) have increased subchondral bone remodelling and thus increased 18F Sodium Fluoride (18F-NaF) uptake in the painful knee compared to the opposite knee measured by simultaneous positron emission tomography and computed tomography (PET/CT) and to examine whether the increased uptake is associated with pain intensity, with patient-reported function and with pain localization. Furthermore we aim to investigate the effect of an acute patellofemoral loading bout on the bone remodelling.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is a highly prevalent musculoskeletal condition mainly affecting younger people, causing pain, physical disability, and reduced quality of life. The cause of PFP is still unknown. It is, i.e., unclear whether there is a link between PFP and changes in the cartilaginous (subchondral) bone in the joint between the patella and the femur.

Our goals are to use 18F NaF PET/CT to evaluate whether subjects with unilateral patellofemoral pain exhibit elevated bone metabolic activity in the painful knee compared to the pain free knee and to determine whether bone metabolic activity correlates with pain intensity and location of pain. Furthermore, we aim to investigate the effects of acute loading on the bone metabolic activity.

The primary objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess whether patients with unilateral PFP have increased bone metabolic activity in the painful knee compared to the pain free knee. We will assess quantitative parameters indicative of bone metabolic activity (Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) and kinetic data) and compare values between the painful knee and the pain free knee. The secondary objectives are to 1) determine whether a bout of single leg weight bearing knee bends standing on a wedge result in increased bone metabolic activity acutely in the painful knee compared to the pain free knee, and 2) identify "hot" regions of abnormal tracer uptake and compare area and SUV values between the painful knee and the pain free knee.

An explorative objective is to determine the correlation between bone metabolic activity and pain intensity and location of pain.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

27

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • København NV, Denmark, 2400
        • Bispebjerg Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults (n = 30) with unilateral anterior knee pain / PFP (3> 10 NRS) will be included from the main study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • A clinical diagnosis of PFP in at least one knee confirmed by an experienced sports medicine doctor.
  • Visual analogue score rating of pain during activities of daily living during the previous week at a minimum of 3 on a 10 cm scale.
  • Insidious onset of symptoms unrelated to trauma and persistent for at least 4 weeks.
  • Pain in the anterior knee associated with at least 3 of the following:

    • During or after activity
    • Prolonged sitting
    • Stair ascent or descent
    • Squatting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Meniscal or other intra-articular injury
  • Cruciate or collateral ligament laxity or tenderness
  • Patellar tendon, iliotibial band, or pes anserine tenderness
  • Osgood-Schlatter or Sinding-Larsen-Johansson syndrome
  • History of recurrent patellar subluxation or dislocation
  • History of surgery to the knee joint
  • History of head injury or vestibular disorder within the last 6 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
18F NaF-PET/CT uptake
Time Frame: Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme.
Difference between painful knee and contralateral knee in mean, peak and maximum Standardized Uptake Value (SUV) and in kinetic parameters
Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
18F NaF-PET/CT uptake
Time Frame: Assessed before and after an acute loading programme (on the same day).
Response to acute patellofemoral joint loading in mean, peak and maximum SUV and in kinetic parameters. The outcome represents changes in the parameters from before to after the loading programme
Assessed before and after an acute loading programme (on the same day).
Regions of abnormal tracer uptake
Time Frame: Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme
Identify "hot" regions of abnormal tracer uptake and compare area and SUV values between the painful knee and the pain free knee
Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
18F NaF-PET/CT uptake and pain intensity, pain localization and physical function.
Time Frame: Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme
Correlation between tracer uptake parameters and pain intensity measured by pain algometry, pain localization measured by pain drawings and physical function measured by the Anterior Knee Pain Scale
Cross sectional assessment at baseline, i.e., before the loading programme

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

January 2, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

December 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 20, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 21, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 31, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 27, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome

Clinical Trials on 18F NaF-PET/CT and cone beam CT scans

3
Subscribe