Effect of a Programme Based on Professional Ethics in Physiotherapy Students

Effect of a Higher Education Programme Based on Professional Ethics in Physiotherapy Students

The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a higher education programme based on professional ethics in physiotherapy students.

A simple-blind clinical trial was performed. A three-months program based in professional ethics was carried out.

The investigators compared a control group (traditonal lectures) with an intervention group (syllabus, activities, face to face techniques). Students´ attitudes, knowledge, professional values, and opinions towards professional ethics were evaluated before and after the programme, in both groups. All participants were informed about the study and procedures, and provided written informed consent.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Ethics
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Experimental group

Detailed Description

Participants. Second-year degree students of Physiotherapy Degree at the University, aged between 20 and 30 years, were recruited voluntarily from January 2019 to April 2019 . All enrolled participants were informed of the purpose of the study and procedures, and provided written informed consent. The study was carried out at the institution where the authors belong.

Research design. A prospective simple-blind trial was performed. After baseline assessment, participants were allocated to one of the two groups (control group and experimental group). An external assistant not involved in the study performed assignment.

Intervention. A Physiotherapy professor with over-10-year experience in Ethics and Physiotherapy performed the teaching methodology and opened the allocation envelopes and applied the teaching methodology to the EG according to the group assignment. The intervention consisted of a three-month program based in professional ethics, including two phases: A) syllabus and activities; and B) face to face group sessions including techniques such as concept maps, glossaries, brainstorming, four corners activity, aquarium, philip 6-6, kahoot, Realm Individual-Process Situation, reduced groups, guided debates, and discussion groups.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 241
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Spain
  • Valencia, Spain, 46010
    • University of Valencia

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 30 years (Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• To study the physical therapy degree at the University of Valencia

Exclusion Criteria:

• Exclusion criterion was having prior training on Ethics subject

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Non-Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control group; Control group followed traditional lectures about professional ethics during 3 months as usual.
Experimental: Experimental group; Experimental group followed the programme based in professional ethics. A specific syllabus about Professional Ethics was developed. It consisted of 6 themes and included topics as moral values, ethics and moral, bioethics and professional ethics, ecc. Six related activities were created: to solve situations related to real clinical practices. Face to face group sessions based on cooperative learning were planned. Students were divided in small groups, and active participation techniques were used. Techniques used: concept maps, glossaries, brainstorming, four corners activity, aquarium, philip 6-6, kahoot, Realm Individual-Process Situation, reduced groups, guided debates, and discussion groups.	Other: Experimental group; Experimental group followed the 3-months programme based in professional ethics. A specific syllabus about Professional Ethics was developed. It consisted of 6 themes and included topics as moral values, ethics and moral, bioethics and professional ethics, ecc. Six related activities were created: to solve situations related to real clinical practices. Face to face group sessions based on cooperative learning were planned. Students were divided in small groups, and active participation techniques were used.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Knowledge of Professional Ethicss	measured with an ad-hoc retention test. The students were not previously informed about retention exams to avoid any preparation for the test. The tests included 15 multiple choice questions that assessed basic professional ethics concepts that physiotherapy students are required to know, such as: moral values, bioethics and Professional Ethics in physiotherapy, professional ethical principles, physiotherapists deontological code, ethical situations, or professional values in physiotherapy.	12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Perception of knowledge regarding professional Ethics	A self-reported questionnaire of 19 items (the Perceptions about Knowledge regarding Professional Ethics in Physiotherapy, PKPEPT, Cronbach's alpha=0.760) was previously described.27,28 The higher score indicated the best perception of knowlegde. The questionnaires' items included basic professional ethics concepts that physiotherapy students are required to know. Therefore, questions assessed participants' perception about knowledge regarding basic concepts in Professional Ethics and their application in physiotherapy care. Items were created in order to be important and to be clearly related with perception of knowledge.	12 weeks
Quality assessment	It was assessed for both groups by the Teaching evaluation of the Center for Quality of the University of Valencia. This center offers the students online surveys with different items evaluating the teaching methodologies, materials and general satisfaction by a Likert scale (1 totally disagree to 5 totally agree) in undergraduate degree, through the Virtual Office of the University.	12 weeks
Satisfaction assessment	For the Cooperative Learning group, an ad-hoc satisfaction questionnaire was carried out, using the Kahoot application. The satisfaction questionnaire included 16 questions in total: 5 dichotomous questions about opinion about the methodology, 5 dichotomous questions about the themes; 3 Likert-type questions (not at all / little / quite / a lot) about interest and usefulness of the content / contents, and 3 questions about satisfaction, usefulness and fun with respect to the techniques used, Likert-type: from 0 to 5 points. This evaluation was only carried out at the end of the program.	12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Valencia

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): January 2, 2019
• Primary Completion (Actual): April 30, 2019
• Study Completion (Actual): March 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: January 2, 2019
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: January 4, 2019
• First Posted (Actual): January 7, 2019

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): April 8, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 4, 2021
• Last Verified: April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Other Study ID Numbers: 545879652

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: NO

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No