Patient Satisfaction and Safety With Propofol Based Sedation With or Without Fentanyl for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

January 10, 2019 updated by: Yanqing Li, Shandong University

Patient Satisfaction and Safety With Propofol Based Sedation With or Without Fentanyl for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy :a Prospective ,Randomized ,and Cohort Study

Patient satisfaction and safety with propofol based sedation with or without fentanyl for gastrointestinal endoscopy

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study divide patients into two groups, one will be given propofol midazolam and fentanyl; another group was given propofol with midazolam without fentanyl; to observe two groups of patients blood pressure, body movement, and propofol dosage , and the difference in operator satisfaction, and how many people need to give fentanyl again; and two groups of patients after the operation of the reaction, if there are dizziness, nausea, and other adverse reactions; finally, the differences of these two schemes in different populations were analyzed, and the rationalization and individualized medication will be put forward.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

500

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 18 or older
  • Patients scheduled for an outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy by the principal investigator.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of colorectal surgery
  • Patients with ASA class 4 or 5,
  • Patients with pre-existing hypoxaemia (SpO2<90%),
  • Patients with hypotension (SBP<90mmHg)
  • Patients with bradycardia (HR<50 bpm)
  • patients with severe chronic renal failure (creatinine clearance<30 ml/min)
  • patients with uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure>170 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure>100 mm Hg)
  • patients with pregnancy or lactation
  • Patients hemodynamically unstable
  • Patients unable to give informed consent
  • Patients with a history of drug allergies;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control group
Participants are given standard regimen: 50-200mg propofol and 1 mg midazolam
participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 50-200mg propofol.
Other Names:
  • Jingan, J20110055
participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 1 mg midazolam.
Other Names:
  • Liyuexi, H10980025
Experimental: Fentanyl group
Participants are given intervention regimen: 50ug fentanyl, plus 50-200mg propofol and 1 mg midazolam.
participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 50-200mg propofol.
Other Names:
  • Jingan, J20110055
participants in both groups are given standard regimen including 1 mg midazolam.
Other Names:
  • Liyuexi, H10980025
participants in fentanyl group are given intervention regimen: 50ug fentanyl.
Other Names:
  • Yichang, H42022076

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Satisfaction assessed by the rate of vomit and diazzy after the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Rates of vomit and diazzy of patients after the procedure between the two groups
half a year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety assessed by the rate of hypoxia during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Hypoxia, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation <90% for >30 seconds
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of hypotention during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Hypotension, defined as systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of hyoxemia during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Hypoxia, defined as peripheral oxygen saturation <90% for >30 seconds
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of breadycardia during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Bradycardia, defined as heart rate <50 beats/min
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of required airway management during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Required airway management such as jaw lifting, mask ventilation, or tracheal intubation in severe hypoxia
half a year
Safety assessed by the rate of involuntary movement during the procedure
Time Frame: half a year
Involuntary movements, defined as unconscious movements requiring restraint or severe limb movement interrupting the endoscopy procedure
half a year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: yanqing li, Dr., Qilu Hospital of Shandong University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 22, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 14, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2019

Last Verified

January 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Patient Satisfaction

Clinical Trials on 50-200mg propofol

3
Subscribe