OPtimisation of Surgical Repair for Treating Insufficiency of the MItral Valve - Safety Evaluation

February 25, 2021 updated by: Kephalios

OPtimisation of Surgical Repair for Treating Insufficiency of the MItral Valve - Safety Evaluation (OPTIMISE)

The optimal surgical approach in functional mitral regurgitation (MI) was questioned in favour for prosthetic replacement due to the reduced risk of recurrent MI . However, adjustable mitral rings may provide an alternative . In this first-in-man trial, a novel balloon-adjustable mitral-ring was assessed regarding clinical safety and feasibility. 5 patients will be enrolled according to the inclusion/ exclusion criteria and subsequently implanted with the study device. Study visits will be performed preoperatively, perioperatively, at discharge, at 30 days, 3 months and 6 months. Primary outcome parameter will be morbidity and mortality at 30 days following implantation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University of Vienna - Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Patients

  1. with symptomatic severe Mitral Regurgitation (Carpentier's classification Type I or II P2) or in asymptomatic subjects with preserved Left Ventricle function and new onset of atrial fibrillation or pulmonary hypertension;
  2. with EuroScore II < 4;
  3. with Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction ≥ 55%;
  4. with normal coronary angiogram (no significant lesions);
  5. in satisfactory condition, based on the physical exam and investigator's experience, with a life expectancy above one year after the intervention;
  6. willing to sign the informed consent;
  7. willing to undergo all medical follow-up, echocardiography examinations and laboratory tests planned for the clinical investigation.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients

  1. of age < 18 years;
  2. who are pregnant;
  3. nursing mothers;
  4. who require undergoing MRI examination;
  5. involved in any other clinical investigation for drugs or devices;
  6. with previous cardiac surgery or diaphragmatic lesion or previous hepatic surgery;
  7. needing acute intervention;
  8. with active endocarditis (or having had active endocarditis in the last three months);
  9. with active myocarditis;
  10. with heavily calcified mitral annulus or mitral valve anatomy with a high risk of valve replacement instead of valve repair;
  11. needing any cardiac surgery other than mitral repair, tricuspid valve annuloplasty, pacemaker implantation (epicardial), exclusion of left appendage (with device or surgically) and Maze (or PVI) procedure;
  12. with severe pulmonary hypertension (systolic pulmonary artery pressure at rest >65 mmHg);
  13. with LV Ejection Fraction < 55%;
  14. with creatinine level > 2.0 mg/100ml;
  15. with echocardiographic measurements predicting SAM (see specific echocardiography protocol);
  16. unable to take anticoagulation medications;
  17. with a known untreatable allergy to contrast media or nickel;
  18. with a major or progressive non-cardiac disease that, in the investigator's experience, results in a life expectancy shorter than 1 year, or for whom the implant of the device produces an unacceptable increase of risk;
  19. having had an acute preoperative neurological deficit, myocardial infarction, or cardiac event that has not returned to baseline or stabilized ≥ 30 days prior to the planned surgical procedure.
  20. unable to understand and sign the ICF in absence of legal protection
  21. unable to read and write
  22. anticipated ring size very small (26mm) or very large (36mm)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Implanted Patients
Implantation of Kephalios Device 1
The Kephalios Device 1 is an adjustable annuloplasty ring, to be implanted by open surgery, having a hollow structure that comprises a flat rigid ring surrounding a deformable cage. The unique feature of the Kephalios Device 1 is that its annular shape and dimension can be finely adjusted percutaneously by an external actuator (three-balloon catheter) independently in the three areas corresponding to P1, P2 and P3

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the safety of the Kephalios Device 1 in terms of mortality
Time Frame: 30 days after implant
Valve-relatedness determined according to the STS/AATS/EACTS report - Akins, C. W., Miller, D. C., Turina, M. I., Kouchoukos, N. T., Blackstone, E. H., Grunkemeier, G. L., … Lytle, B. W. (2008). Guidelines for Reporting Mortality and Morbidity After Cardiac Valve Interventions. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 85(4), 1490-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.082alve-relatedness determined according to the STS/AATS/EACTS report - Akins, C. W., Miller, D. C., Turina, M. I., Kouchoukos, N. T., Blackstone, E. H., Grunkemeier, G. L., … Lytle, B. W. (2008). Guidelines for Reporting Mortality and Morbidity After Cardiac Valve Interventions. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 85(4), 1490-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.082
30 days after implant
Assessment of the safety of the Kephalios Device 1 in terms of morbidity
Time Frame: 30 days after implant
Morbid events determined according to the STS/AATS/EACTS report - Akins, C. W., Miller, D. C., Turina, M. I., Kouchoukos, N. T., Blackstone, E. H., Grunkemeier, G. L., … Lytle, B. W. (2008). Guidelines for Reporting Mortality and Morbidity After Cardiac Valve Interventions. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 85(4), 1490-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.082
30 days after implant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety in terms of mortality
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months after implant
Valve-relatedness determined according to the STS/AATS/EACTS report - Akins, C. W., Miller, D. C., Turina, M. I., Kouchoukos, N. T., Blackstone, E. H., Grunkemeier, G. L., … Lytle, B. W. (2008). Guidelines for Reporting Mortality and Morbidity After Cardiac Valve Interventions. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 85(4), 1490-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.082
3 and 6 months after implant
Safety in terms of morbidity
Time Frame: 3 and 6 months after implant
Morbid events determined according to the STS/AATS/EACTS report - Akins, C. W., Miller, D. C., Turina, M. I., Kouchoukos, N. T., Blackstone, E. H., Grunkemeier, G. L., … Lytle, B. W. (2008). Guidelines for Reporting Mortality and Morbidity After Cardiac Valve Interventions. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 85(4), 1490-1495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.12.082
3 and 6 months after implant
Effectiveness in terms of increase of mitral leaflets coaptation
Time Frame: in the immediate post-operative phase
through data objectively measured through echocardiography
in the immediate post-operative phase
Effectiveness in terms of reduction of Mitral Regurgitation
Time Frame: in the immediate post-operative phase
through data objectively measured through echocardiography
in the immediate post-operative phase
Effectiveness in terms of absence of recurrent Mitral Regurgitation
Time Frame: At hospital discharge or 30 days if subject is still hospitalized, and 6 months
through data objectively measured through echocardiography
At hospital discharge or 30 days if subject is still hospitalized, and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Martin ANDREAS, MBA,PhD, Medical University of Vienna - Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiac Surgery

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 2, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

November 28, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 14, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2021

Last Verified

February 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Valve Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on Kephalios Device 1

Subscribe