The Effects of Spasticity on Glucose Metabolism in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury

August 19, 2020 updated by: Arzu Atici, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

The Effects of Spasticity on Glucose Metabolism and Soft Tissue Body Composition in Individuals With Motor Complete and Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury

Muscle atrophy may occur in individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) as a result of diminished physical activity and alterations in glucose metabolism and body composition may be seen. In a few studies, it has been suggested that spasticity may have a positive impact on glucose metabolism by preventing muscle atrophy and alterations in body composition in individuals with motor complete SCI. Investigators aimed to assess the effects of spasticity on glucose metabolism and body composition in participants with complete and incomplete SCI.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Investigators plan a prospective clinical trial. Participants with SCI were included to study if times from injury were at least one year. Participants had an AIS grades of A-D with spasticity. We evaluated that participants with AIS A and B SCI were motor complete group, AIS C and D SCI were motor incomplete group. Spasticity was assessed with Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and spasms were assessed with Penn Spasm Frequency Scale (PSFS). Hip adductor and extensor spasticity, knee extensor and flexor spasticity and ankle plantar flexor spasticity were assessed by using MAS. Body composition was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. All participants underwent a 75 gram (g) oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Insulin sensitivity was assessed by calculating Matsuda index and HOMA-IR. Investigators assessed the effects of spasticity on glucose metabolism and body composition in participants with SCI.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals with SCI were included to study if they were 18-65 years old and times from injury were at least one year.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Spinal cord injury AIS A,B,C,D

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other central nervous system diseases
  • Significant complications that affect spasticity
  • Joint contracture
  • Diabetes mellitus

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation Between Knee Flexor Muscle Modified Ashworth Scale and Insulin Resistance
Time Frame: One day
Modified Ashworth Scale is used to assess muscle spasticity on a 6-point scale. 0: No increase in muscle tone 4: Affected part(s) is (are) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. HOMA index was used to evaluate insulin resistance. HOMA index is a simple, and inexpensive method used for evaluating insulin sensitivity. In most of the studies, values >2.7 were accepted as insulin resistance. HOMA-IR was calculated by using fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) X fasting insulin (uIU/mL) /405 formula. Pearson correlation was used to calculate the correlation coefficient (r).
One day
Correlation Between Knee Flexor Muscle Modified Ashworth Scale and Insulin Sensitivity
Time Frame: One day
We used the Matsuda index to assess insulin sensitivity. Matsuda index was calculated 10.000/square root (Fasting plasma glucose x fasting plasma insulin) x (mean OGTT glucose concentration X mean OGTT insulin concentration) formula. Higher scores mean better. Modified Ashworth Scale is used to assess muscle spasticity on a 6-point scale. 0: No increase in muscle tone 4: Affected part(s) is (are) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Pearson correlation was used to calculate the correlation coefficient (r).
One day
Correlation Between Penn Spasm Frequency Scale and Insulin Resistance
Time Frame: One day
Penn Spasm Frequency Scale is used to assess spasms. This scale is a 5-point scale. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. HOMA index is a simple, and inexpensive method used for evaluating insulin sensitivity. In most of the studies, values >2.7 were accepted as insulin resistance. HOMA-IR was calculated by using fasting plasma glucose (mg/dL) X fasting insulin (uIU/mL) /405 formula. Pearson correlation was used to calculate the correlation coefficient (r).
One day
Correlation Between Penn Spasm Frequency Scale and Insulin Sensitivity
Time Frame: One day
We used the Matsuda index to assess insulin sensitivity. Matsuda index was calculated 10.000/square root (Fasting plasma glucose x fasting plasma insulin) x (mean OGTT glucose concentration X mean OGTT insulin concentration) formula. Higher scores mean better. Penn Spasm Frequency Scale is used to assess spasms. This scale is a 5-point scale. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Pearson correlation was used to calculate the correlation coefficient (r).
One day
Correlation Between Knee Flexor Muscle Modified Ashworth Scale and Total Body Fat-Free Mass%
Time Frame: One day
The body composition of the individuals was measured by dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA) device. Modified Ashworth Scale is used to assess muscle spasticity on a 6-point scale. 0: No increase in muscle tone 4: Affected part(s) is (are) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Pearson correlation was used to calculate correlation coefficient.
One day
Correlation Between Penn Spasm Frequency Scale and Total Body Fat-Free Mass%
Time Frame: One day
The body composition of the individuals was measured by dual-energy absorptiometry (DXA) device. Penn Spasm Frequency Scale is used to assess spasms. This scale is a 5-point scale. Higher scores mean a worse outcome. Pearson correlation was used to calculate the correlation coefficient (r).
One day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Arzu Atici, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Training and Research Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 21, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 10, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

August 8, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2013/22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Cord Injuries

Clinical Trials on body composition

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Bangladesh

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Subscribe