- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT03882359
An Ascending Dose Comparison of MVT-100 to Definity in Healthy Volunteers
MVT-100: Advancing the Clinical Use of Perflutren Ultrasound Contrast Agents for Suboptimal Echocardiograms
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Ultrasound is one of the most common imaging examinations and has advantages of absence of ionizing radiation, portability and relatively low cost. Ultrasound contrast agents are used to improve the accuracy of ultrasound and Definity (perflutren) is the world's leading ultrasound contrast agent but perflutren has to be refrigerated and has a side effect of back pain. The investigators have developed a new, improved perflutren, MVT-100, with potential for room temperature storage.
Ultrasound contrast agents are used to increase the backscatter (signal intensity of blood vessels and tissues to improve diagnostic accuracy) of ultrasound imaging. In the US ultrasound contrast agents are FDA approved for echocardiography to improve endomyocardial border definition.
MVT-100 reflects the ultrasound to provide strong back-scattering. MVT-100 microbubbles resonate with ultrasound to provide strong harmonic signals. MVT-100 microbubbles will cavitate with higher levels of ultrasound and cavitation may be stable or inertial depending upon acoustic parameters and other factors.
The study is a multi centre ascending dose comparison of Definity and MVT-100 for use in echocardiography and will be performed in a sample of healthy volunteers who are randomized to receive either Definity or MVT-100.
This trial will assess safety and evaluate the following imaging metrics:
- Determine the optimal dose of MVT-100 by comparing MVT-100 vs Definity in the change from baseline of quantitative left ventricular opacification
- Evaluation of qualitative left ventricular opacification (LVO)
- Evaluation of endocardial border delineation
- Evaluation of endocardial border length
- Evaluation of duration of useful contrast
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Missouri
-
Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64111
- Recruiting
- Saint Luke'S Hospital of Kansas City
-
Contact:
- Michael Main, MD
- Phone Number: 816-931-1883
- Email: mmain@saint-lukes.org
-
Contact:
- Caroline W Murray, CCRC
- Phone Number: 816-932-2057
- Email: cwmurray@saint-lukes.org
-
-
Nebraska
-
Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68198
- Not yet recruiting
- University of Nebraska Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Sharon Mclean
- Phone Number: 402-559-7977
- Email: smclean@unmc.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Tom Porter, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult subjects 19 years of age or older, male or female
Female subjects must no longer have child-bearing potential (>1-year post menopause or surgically sterilized), or must
- have a negative urine pregnancy test, and
- be using and continue to use for 30 days after the study a medically effective method of contraception
- Adequate hematologic, renal and hepatic function, as defined by:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/L
- Platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/L
- Hemoglobin ≥ 90 g/L
- Plasma creatinine< 1.5 x ULN
- Total bilirubin within normal limits (< 2.5 x ULN if Gilbert's syndrome)
- Aspartate transaminase (AST) and Alanine transaminase (ALT) < 2.5 x ULN
- Subject must be willing and able to understand the study and provide written Informed Consent to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Myocardial infarction within six months prior to enrollment
- Unstable angina, NYHA Class II or greater congestive heart failure
- EKG evidence of uncontrolled arrhythmia or history of clinically significant arrhythmia within the past six months
- Clinically significant Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) or other pulmonary condition that is not controlled by medication or requires oxygen frequently or continuously
- A history of pulmonary emboli
- Known hypersensitivity to perflutren, DEFINITY® or other echo contrast agent
- Inability to remain supine for 60 minutes
- Oxygen saturation < 95% on room air
- History of allergic reaction attributed to compounds of similar chemical composition to MVT-100 or DEFINITY® or soy or egg allergies (see Investigator's Brochure)
- Subject has received any investigational drug within thirty (30) days prior to enrollment into the study
- Inability to comply with study procedures
- Subjects with any medical condition deemed by the investigator to make the subject inappropriate for participation
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Definity
Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of DEFINITY® 100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour.
|
Images will be recorded in parasternal long, short axis, apical four, two, and three chamber views according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) 17 segment model. Each assessment will include one round of low MI imaging (<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (<0.2) in each of the pre-specified windows according to the 2014 ASE Sonographer Guidelines. A baseline echocardiogram will be performed prior to the administration of DEFINITY® or MVT-100. Assessments will be made three times, once from 0 - 1 ½ minutes following injection, once between 1 ½ minutes to 3 minutes following IV injection and once from 3 - 4 ½ minutes following IV injection. Assessments at each time point will include one round of low MI imaging (<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (<0.2). Each round will include the views in the following order: parasternal long, parasternal short, apical 4, apical 2 and apical 3.
After randomization, Definity, the active comparator, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained.
|
Experimental: MVT-100
Each subject receives 100 uL x 2, 200 uL x 3, 300 uL x 2 or 1 vial of MVT-100 diluted in 50 mL of NS as follows: Two milliliter bolus over 10 seconds prior to each infusion rate;, then infusions will run for 5 minutes at 60 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 90 mL per hour, 5 minutes at 100 mL per hour and 5 minutes at 120 mL per hour.
|
Images will be recorded in parasternal long, short axis, apical four, two, and three chamber views according to the American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) 17 segment model. Each assessment will include one round of low MI imaging (<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (<0.2) in each of the pre-specified windows according to the 2014 ASE Sonographer Guidelines. A baseline echocardiogram will be performed prior to the administration of DEFINITY® or MVT-100. Assessments will be made three times, once from 0 - 1 ½ minutes following injection, once between 1 ½ minutes to 3 minutes following IV injection and once from 3 - 4 ½ minutes following IV injection. Assessments at each time point will include one round of low MI imaging (<0.3) and one round of very low MI imaging (<0.2). Each round will include the views in the following order: parasternal long, parasternal short, apical 4, apical 2 and apical 3.
After randomization, MVT-100, the experimental drug, is administered via IV infusion or bolus administration and echocardiograms are subsequently obtained.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
QT Interval
Time Frame: Day of study
|
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) |
Day of study
|
Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Day of study
|
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) |
Day of study
|
Heart Rate
Time Frame: Day of study
|
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) |
Day of study
|
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: Day of study
|
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) |
Day of study
|
Other Symptoms
Time Frame: Day of study
|
The null hypothesis for safety (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as safe as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for safety will be: MVT-100 is equivalent to, or safer than, DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: Δ2min QT interval EKG(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min QT interval EKG(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Blood Pressure(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Blood Pressure(Definity®) HA: Δ2min Heart Rate(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min Heart Rate(Definity®) HA: Δ2min O2(MVT-100) ≤ Δ2min O2(Definity®) HA: Other Symptom(2min post MVT-100) ≤ Other Symptom(2min post Definity®) |
Day of study
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Left Ventricular Opacification (LVO)
Time Frame: Day of Study
|
The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®) |
Day of Study
|
Cardiac Segment Visualization
Time Frame: Day of Study
|
The null hypothesis for efficacy (H0) will be: MVT-100 is not as effective as DEFINITY®. The alternative hypothesis (HA) for efficacy will be: MVT-100 is equivalently or more effective than DEFINITY®. Specifically, the following hypotheses will be tested: HA: LVO(MVT-100) ≥ LVO(Definity®) HA: SegmentVisualization(MVT-100) ≥ SegmentVisualization(Definity®) |
Day of Study
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pellikka PA, Nagueh SF, Elhendy AA, Kuehl CA, Sawada SG; American Society of Echocardiography. American Society of Echocardiography recommendations for performance, interpretation, and application of stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007 Sep;20(9):1021-41. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2007.07.003. No abstract available.
- Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT, McCulloch ML, Mulvagh SL, Olson JJ, Porcelli C, Tsutsui JM, Wei K. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2014 Aug;27(8):797-810. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2014.05.011. No abstract available.
- Smith-Bindman R, Miglioretti DL, Johnson E, Lee C, Feigelson HS, Flynn M, Greenlee RT, Kruger RL, Hornbrook MC, Roblin D, Solberg LI, Vanneman N, Weinmann S, Williams AE. Use of diagnostic imaging studies and associated radiation exposure for patients enrolled in large integrated health care systems, 1996-2010. JAMA. 2012 Jun 13;307(22):2400-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.5960.
- Platts DG, Luis SA, Roper D, Burstow D, Call T, Forshaw A, Pascoe R. The safety profile of perflutren microsphere contrast echocardiography during rest and stress imaging: results from an Australian multicentre cohort. Heart Lung Circ. 2013 Dec;22(12):996-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2013.05.637. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
- Weissman, Neil J., Warren J. Manning, and Brian C. Downey. Contrast echocardiography: clinical applications. Waltham, MA : UpToDate, 2013.
- Lantheus Medical Imaging. Definity Package Insert. Definity Imaging. [Online] http://www.definityimaging.com/pdf/DEFINITY_US_PI_515987-0117.pdf.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 00029941
- 1R44HL137447-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Heart Diseases
-
Baker Heart and Diabetes InstitutePrincess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Australia; Royal Perth Hospital; Alice... and other collaboratorsRecruitingHeart Failure | Valve Heart DiseaseAustralia
-
Medical University of ViennaUnknownHeart Diseases | Heart Failure | Valvular Heart DiseaseAustria
-
Centre Chirurgical Marie LannelongueActive, not recruitingValvular Heart Disease | Valve Disease, Heart
-
Abiomed Inc.RecruitingHeart Diseases | Acute Decompensated Heart Failure | Congestive Heart Failure | Acute Heart FailureUnited States
-
Kathirvel SubramaniamUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore; CSL BehringRecruitingHeart Failure,Congestive | Heart Disease End StageUnited States
-
Wuerzburg University HospitalRecruitingHeart Failure | Chronic Heart Failure | Chronic Heart DiseaseGermany
-
University of MichiganTerminatedDiastolic Heart Failure | Hypertensive Heart DiseaseUnited States
-
Yonsei UniversityCompletedMitral Valvular Heart Disease
-
Aristotle University Of ThessalonikiRecruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Heart Failure | Valvular Heart Disease | Biochemical DysfunctionGreece
-
University College, LondonBritish Heart Foundation; Horizon 2020 - European CommissionRecruitingValvular Heart DiseaseUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Echocardiogram
-
Duke UniversityRecruiting
-
Barts & The London NHS TrustRecruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Functional Mitral Regurgitation | Functional Tricuspid RegurgitationUnited Kingdom
-
Duke UniversityFogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health; Duke Center... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
CryoLife, Inc.CompletedAortic Valve Stenosis | Aortic Valve Insufficiency | Pulmonary Valve Insufficiency | Pulmonary Valve StenosisUnited States
-
CryoLife, Inc.CompletedAortic Valve Stenosis | Aortic Valve InsufficiencyUnited States
-
University Health Network, TorontoActive, not recruitingCOVID-19 Respiratory InfectionCanada
-
University of PennsylvaniaCompleted
-
Queen Mary University of LondonBarts & The London NHS TrustRecruitingHeart Valve Diseases | Left Ventricular DysfunctionUnited Kingdom
-
NHS Greater Glasgow and ClydeUniversity of GlasgowCompletedHeart FailureUnited Kingdom
-
Emory UniversityCompletedPulmonary Valve Stenosis | Right Ventricle | Pulmonary Valve AtresiaUnited States