Assessing the Effectiveness and Feasibility of Voluntary Assisted Partner Notification Services (VAPN)

August 12, 2019 updated by: Hannock Tweya, PhD, MSc, Lighthouse Trust

Assessing the Effectiveness and Feasibility of Voluntary Assisted Partner Notification Services in High HIV Burden Districts of Malawi: a Pragmatic, Non-Randomized Stepped-Wedge Study

To evaluate effectiveness of voluntary assisted partner notification (VAPN) in real-world programmatic settings, a non-randomized, stepped wedge study in high volume facilities in 6 high HIV burden focus districts (Blantyre, Zomba, Chikwawa, Machinga, Mangochi and Lilongwe urban) is proposed. The primary objective is to compare the percentage of contacts tested during the standard of care (SOC) phase (i.e., using passive family referral services (FRS) index testing methodology) with the percentage of contacts tested during the SOC plus VAPN phase, by 1, 2, and 3 months after the initial contact with the index client. Assessment of feasibility will be achieved through documentation of operational lessons learned during implementation. Findings will contribute to ongoing policy discussions whether Malawi should adopt VAPN in its national HIV testing guidelines

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Detailed Description

The over-arching goal of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of the voluntary assisted partner notification (VAPN) intervention in real-world programmatic settings in high burden facilities in 6 priority districts in Malawi.

The primary objective is to compare effectiveness of standard of care (SOC) (i.e., use of the family referral services (FRS)) with SOC plus VAPN in reaching contacts of index clients with HIV testing services. The percentage of contacts who receive HIV testing services within 1, 2, and 3 months of the initial offer of services to the index client will be compared between the SOC phase and the intervention phase (SOC plus VAPN).

Secondary objectives include:

  1. To evaluate feasibility of implementing VAPN in real-world programmatic settings in high burden facilities in 6 priority districts in Malawi. Two key quantitative measures of feasibility will be used as follows:

    • What is the cumulative percentage of eligible index clients offered VAPN services by study end?
    • To what extent were the interventions implemented with fidelity? For example, a key measure of the fidelity of the Client Referral VAPN option is to assess what percentage of contacts, who did not return for their scheduled first appointment at the clinic, were subsequently traced according to the specified algorithm (i.e., up to 5 phone calls, and up to 2 home visits)?
  2. To monitor trends in HIV diagnostic yield from SOC plus VAPN over time.

The study will include three options in additional to the FRS as part of the World Health organisation-recommended index testing approach. The first option is contract referral, in which the index client can choose to enter into a "contract" with the healthcare provider whereby he or she agrees to disclose their HIV status to all partners and refer them to HIV testing services (HTS) within a certain time frame. If the partners do not access HTS within this period, the providers will contact the partners directly to notify them that they may have been exposed to HIV; the providers will then offer voluntary HTS while maintaining the confidentiality of the index client. The second option is that of provider referral, in which the index client can choose to have the healthcare provider contact the client's partners directly, provide them with an appropriate health message, and offer them voluntary HTS, while maintaining the confidentiality of the index client. The third option is dual referral, in which the index client can choose that a trained provider sits with the client and his/her partner at a suitable time and location (usually a private room at the health facility) to provide support as they potentially test together or the index client discloses his/her HIV status with the provider offering voluntary HTS to the partner.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1785

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion criteria:

Index clients:

  • All index clients who are 18 years old or older (i.e., new positives, known positives not on treatment, and known positives who are on treatment), will be eligible for the study and eligible to receive VAPN services if informed consent is given.
  • Index clients who are inpatients and pregnant women are eligible for inclusion in the study and in VAPN services if informed consent is given.

Contacts:

• All contacts of any age are eligible to be included in the study and eligible to receive HIV testing services according to Ministry of Health (MOH) guidelines. The age of consent to receive any component of HIV testing services in Malawi is 13. Prior to testing a contact (e.g., a child of an index case) who is <13 years old, for HIV, the guardian's consent is needed, per MOH guidelines.

Exclusion criteria:

Index clients

  • Did not consent
  • Aged <18 years old a
  • Prisoners, Mentally disabled
  • Intimate partner violence
  • Cannot explain the three VAPN options (contract, referral, and dual referral) in a way that would result in true informed assent on the part of the client.

Contacts:

• There are no exclusion criteria for contacts to be included in the study or receive HIV testing services if they or their guardian desire services. Contacts who are <13 years old will not be contacted by phone under any VAPN contact outreach scenario.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Assisted Partner notification services
Voluntary assisted partner notification (VAPN) services will be offered at facilities according to a stepped wedge design. Once VAPN services are activated at a facility, HIV positive individuals will be offered four options (3 voluntary assisted partner notification options and 1 standard of care option) for inviting their contacts, which they can choose to accept or decline.
Three options for partner Notification services; contract referral, provider referral and dual referral

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of eligible index clients offered VAPN services
Time Frame: 10 months
Number of eligible index clients who are offered VAPN divide by the number of all eligible index clients identified for enrolment
10 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of contacts who returned for HIV testing
Time Frame: 10 months
Number of contacts who return for HIV testing divided by the number of contacts who are expected to return for HIV testing
10 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV Yield over time
Time Frame: 10 months
Proportion of Contacts who tested HIV positive during the study period
10 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 21, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

April 29, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 16, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 9, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 13, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 12, 2019

Last Verified

August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on Assisted Partner Notification Services

3
Subscribe