- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04086784
3D-printed Porous Titanium Alloy Cages Versus PEEK Cages in Patients With Osteoporosis (3DCOP)
3D-printed Porous Titanium Alloy Cages Versus PEEK Cages: Pedicle Screw Loosening Rate and Fusion Rate in Patients With Osteoporosis
Study Overview
Status
Detailed Description
Pedicle screw fixation is a widely used technique for the surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases, which can stabilize the spine before solid fusion and restore spinal balance. However, because of population aging and the high rate of osteoporosis in the elderly with lumbar degenerative diseases, the pedicle screw loosening has become a frequently reported complication. The bone-screw interface in osteoporotic spine is unstable, leading to reduced pull-out force and cut-out force. Most of the previous studies only focused on the methods used to directly strengthen the pedicle screws, few of them explored the feasibility of reducing the loosening rate by accelerating the lumbar fusion precess.
The 3D-printed porous titanium alloy cages have been proved to have advantages in speeding up and enhancing the lumbar fusion over conventional PEEK cages. Therefore, we hypothesize that patients undergoing PLIF with 3D-printed cages can achieve lumbar fusion earlier than those using PEEK cages, thus the 3D-printed cages can reduce the load on pedicle screws sooner than PEEK cages. Finally, the 3D-printed cages can reduce the loosening rate and increase the fusion rate.
The osteoporotic patients requiring posterior lumbar interbody fusion(PLIF) with cages at the lowest fusion segment are prospectively enrolled and followed up. The researchers will invite appropriate patients to participate in the study after their surgical plans are determined. General patients data are collected after informed consent, such as age, gender, weight, height, bone mineral density measured in T-scores and Hounsfield units, detailed surgical plans, and etc. They are followed up at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months according to our clinical routine, including lumbar x-ray and certain questions about the clinical outcomes. In addition, this study requires the patients to have lumbar CT scans when the fusion status is unclear in x-ray, especially for the 6 months follow-up.
The patients undergoing PLIF with the 3D-printed porous titanium alloy cages are compared with those using conventional PEEK cages. The primary endpoints are the loosening rate and fusion rate at 6 months follow-up. The secondary endpoints are the loosening rate and fusion rate at other time point of follow-up , and the clinical outcomes(ODI and VAS) at every follow-up.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing
-
Beijing, Beijing, China, 100191
- Peking University Third Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- aged≥ 50 years old
- lumbar degenerative diseases requiring lumbar fusion with pedicle screw fixation, such as degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.
- no response to nonoperative treatment of at least 3 months
- osteoporosis diagnosed by any method for bone mineral density evaluation, such as DXA, QCT,or vertebral Hounsfield units
- the lowest instrumented vertebrae were at L5 or S1
- the surgical plan includes lumbar interbody fusion with cages at the lowest fusion level
- informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- the surgical plan includes any techniques used to strengthen the fixation,such as augmentation of the pedicle screw with bone cement
- no lumbar CT scans within 3 months before the surgery
- no dual energy x-ray absorptiometry within 6 months before the surgery
- spondylolysis
- allergic to metal
- history of lumbar fusion surgery
- cervical myelopathy,thoracic spinal stenosis, motor neuron disease,tuberculosis of spine,spinal tumor
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
---|
3D-printed Cage
Patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion with 3D-printed Porous Titanium Alloy Cages at the lowest fusion segment
|
Peek Cage
Patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion with PEEK Cages at the lowest fusion segment
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pedicle screw loosening rate at the lowest instrumented vertebrae
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The presence of radiolucent zones of ≥ 1mm thick around the pedicle screws, broken screws, or obvious screw back-out and cut-out on x-ray images.
|
6 months
|
Fusion rate at the lowest fusion level
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The presence of continuous fusion mass at bone graft site in CT scans and less than 3 degree of intervertebral mobility on lateral flextion-extension x-ray images.
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Pedicle screw loosening rate at the lowest instrumented vertebrae
Time Frame: 3 months;12 months; 24 months
|
The presence of radiolucent zones of ≥ 1mm thick around the pedicle screws, broken screws, or obvious screw back-out and cut-out on x-ray images.
|
3 months;12 months; 24 months
|
Fusion rate at the lowest fusion level
Time Frame: 3 months;12 months; 24 months
|
The presence of continuous fusion mass at bone graft site in CT scans and less than 3 degree of intervertebral mobility on lateral flextion-extension x-ray images.
|
3 months;12 months; 24 months
|
Disability
Time Frame: 3 months; 6 months;12 months; 24 months
|
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (0-100) is used to assess disability.
|
3 months; 6 months;12 months; 24 months
|
Back pain
Time Frame: 3 months; 6 months;12 months; 24 months
|
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0-10) is used the evaluate back pain.
|
3 months; 6 months;12 months; 24 months
|
Leg pain
Time Frame: 3 months; 6 months;12 months; 24 months
|
The Visual Analog Scale (VAS 0-10) is used the evaluate leg pain.
|
3 months; 6 months;12 months; 24 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pannell WC, Savin DD, Scott TP, Wang JC, Daubs MD. Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States. Spine J. 2015 Aug 1;15(8):1719-27. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.014. Epub 2013 Oct 31.
- Amirouche F, Solitro GF, Magnan BP. Stability and Spine Pedicle Screws Fixation Strength-A Comparative Study of Bone Density and Insertion Angle. Spine Deform. 2016 Jul;4(4):261-267. doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
- Okuyama K, Abe E, Suzuki T, Tamura Y, Chiba M, Sato K. Influence of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation: a study of pedicle screw fixation augmenting posterior lumbar interbody fusion in elderly patients. Spine J. 2001 Nov-Dec;1(6):402-7. doi: 10.1016/s1529-9430(01)00078-x.
- Bredow J, Boese CK, Werner CM, Siewe J, Lohrer L, Zarghooni K, Eysel P, Scheyerer MJ. Predictive validity of preoperative CT scans and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in spinal surgery. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2016 Aug;136(8):1063-7. doi: 10.1007/s00402-016-2487-8. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
- Galbusera F, Volkheimer D, Reitmaier S, Berger-Roscher N, Kienle A, Wilke HJ. Pedicle screw loosening: a clinically relevant complication? Eur Spine J. 2015 May;24(5):1005-16. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3768-6. Epub 2015 Jan 24.
- Tokuhashi Y, Matsuzaki H, Oda H, Uei H. Clinical course and significance of the clear zone around the pedicle screws in the lumbar degenerative disease. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Apr 15;33(8):903-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816b1eff.
- Goldstein CL, Brodke DS, Choma TJ. Surgical Management of Spinal Conditions in the Elderly Osteoporotic Spine. Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S98-107. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000948.
- Janssen I, Ryang YM, Gempt J, Bette S, Gerhardt J, Kirschke JS, Meyer B. Risk of cement leakage and pulmonary embolism by bone cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation of the thoracolumbar spine. Spine J. 2017 Jun;17(6):837-844. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.01.009. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
- Chen P, Li Z, Hu Y. Prevalence of osteoporosis in China: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2016 Oct 3;16(1):1039. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3712-7.
- Bokov A, Bulkin A, Aleynik A, Kutlaeva M, Mlyavykh S. Pedicle Screws Loosening in Patients With Degenerative Diseases of the Lumbar Spine: Potential Risk Factors and Relative Contribution. Global Spine J. 2019 Feb;9(1):55-61. doi: 10.1177/2192568218772302. Epub 2018 May 24.
- McGilvray KC, Easley J, Seim HB, Regan D, Berven SH, Hsu WK, Mroz TE, Puttlitz CM. Bony ingrowth potential of 3D-printed porous titanium alloy: a direct comparison of interbody cage materials in an in vivo ovine lumbar fusion model. Spine J. 2018 Jul;18(7):1250-1260. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.02.018. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
- Li P, Jiang W, Yan J, Hu K, Han Z, Wang B, Zhao Y, Cui G, Wang Z, Mao K, Wang Y, Cui F. A novel 3D printed cage with microporous structure and in vivo fusion function. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2019 Jul;107(7):1386-1392. doi: 10.1002/jbm.a.36652. Epub 2019 Mar 18.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- M2019270
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- Clinical Study Report (CSR)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Degenerative Disc Disease
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisTerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc Disease | Kyphosis | Lumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseFrance
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Spine BioPharma, IncMCRARecruitingLumbar Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
AxioMed Spine CorporationUnknownDegenerative Disc Disease (DDD)United States, Germany
-
Synthes USA HQ, Inc.CompletedLumbar Degenerative Disc Disease
-
DePuy InternationalTerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseAustralia, Germany, Italy, Malaysia, Netherlands, Spain, United Kingdom
-
Synergy Spine SolutionsMCRARecruitingCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Orthofix Inc.TerminatedCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited States
-
Yuhan CorporationCompletedDisc Degenerative DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Synergy Spine SolutionsMCRANot yet recruitingCervical Degenerative Disc DiseaseUnited Kingdom