Deep NMB in Ambulatory Gynecological Laparoscopy

December 7, 2019 updated by: Wahba bakhet

Deep Neuromuscular Blockade to Improve Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Ambulatory Gynaecologic Laparoscopy

Gynecological laparoscopic surgery is commonly performed as an ambulatory basis for the aim of rapid discharge, reduce hospital stay with reduced costs and to improve postoperative QOR [1,2]. However, the creation of pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopy may cause postoperative pain and other physiological changes [3], which could influence the postoperative QOR negatively [4]. Poor postoperative QOR leads to prolonged hospital stay [5].

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Deep NMB is known to improve surgical conditions and pneumoperitoneium related complications in laparoscopic surgery [6,7,8,9]. However, it is unknown whether deep NMB improves postoperative QOR in ambulatory gynecological laparoscopy.

Therefore, we designed a double blind randomised trial to compare the effects of deep and moderate NMB on postoperative QOR in ambulatory gynecological laparoscopic surgery. We hypothesized that deep NMB improves postoperative QOR, compared to moderate NMB. The primary outcome was postoperative QOR in POD1. The secondary outcome was quality of surgical conditions, pain scores, time to meet PACU and hospital discharge, and opioid consumption

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

80

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kuwait, Kuwait, 002
        • Elite Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I and II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Neuromuscular disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Moderate block
In the moderate NMB group, a TOF count of 1 to 2 was maintained and NMB was reversed with a combination of neostigmine and glycopyrolate at the end of surgery.
MODERATE block to TOF1-2
Other Names:
  • Neuromuscular blocker
Active Comparator: DEEP BLOCK
In the deep NMB-group, a PTC of 1 to 2 twitches was maintained, and NMB was reversed with sugammadex at the end of surgery.
DEEP block to PTC 1-3
Other Names:
  • Neuromuscular blocker

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of recovery
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
Quality of recovery-40 (QoR-40) questionnaire, which includes five general quality of life dimensions: physical independence (5 items), pain (7 items), .emotional state (9 items), psychological support (7 items), and physical independence (5 items). Each item was graded with a 5-point score: none of the time, some of the time,usually, most of the time and all of the time. The total score on the QoR- 40 questionnaire ranges from 40 to 200 representing, respectively, extremely poor to excellent
24 hours postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain
Time Frame: During the length of hospital stay post surgery (on average 24 hours)
Visual analogue scale with its 0 to 10 score range: (0 (no pain) to 10 ( Severe pain)
During the length of hospital stay post surgery (on average 24 hours)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 26, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 10, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Web

IPD Sharing Time Frame

1 YEAR

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Web

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Muscle Relaxation

Clinical Trials on Rocuronium

3
Subscribe