A 3 Years Naturalistic Cohort Survey of Altis Single Incision Sling System For Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

May 22, 2026 updated by: Coloplast A/S

A 3 Years Naturalistic Cohort Survey of Altis Single Incision Sling System For Female Stress Urinary Incontinence A Post-marketing and Multicenter Prospective Observational Cohort Study in Subjects With Female Stress Urinary Incontinence

The purpose of this study is to monitor the use of Altis Single Incision Sling (SIS) in a real world population and collect medical data on effectiveness and to monitor safety of Altis SIS at 12 and 36 months post device implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

This project has been launched after the introduction of Altis in Europe. This study is a multicenter prospective, observational (i.e. naturalistic) post-marketing clinical follow-up of women for who stress urinary incontinence was diagnosed and will be treated with Altis Single Incision Sling System. Therefore these patients will be asked to allow to use their clinical data and answer some questionnaires. The patients'data will be collected in routine clinical practice before, during and after surgery until 12 months. Then, questionnaires will be mailed to the participants annually during 2 additional years.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

598

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
        • UZ Leuven
      • Angers, France, 49933
        • CHRU Hôtel Dieu
      • Avignon, France, 84082
        • Clinique Rhône Durance
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • CHU Pellegrin-Urology Departement
      • Bordeaux, France, 33076
        • CHU Pellegrin_Gyneacology Departement
      • Bruges, France, 33523
        • Polyclinique Jean Villars
      • Béziers, France, 34535
        • Clinique Champeau Mediterranée
      • Castres, France, 81108
        • Hôpital du Pays d'Autan
      • Chambray-lès-Tours, France, 37170
        • Pole Sante Leonard de Vinci
      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Chu Clermont Ferrand
      • Dreux, France, 28102
        • Hôpital Victor Jousselin
      • Issoire, France, 63503
        • CH Paul Ardier
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, France, 85106
        • Clinique Saint-Charles
      • La Rochelle, France, 17019
        • Centre Hospitalier Saint Louis
      • La Rochelle, France, 17087
        • Clinique du Mail La Rochelle
      • Lambres-lez-Douai, France, 59552
        • Clinique Saint-Amé
      • Libourne, France, 33500
        • CH Libourne
      • Lorient, France, 56100
        • Clinique Mutualiste de la Porte de l'Orient
      • Massy, France, 91349
        • Hopital Prive Jacques Cartier
      • Nogent-sur-Marne, France, 94130
        • Armand Brillart Hospital
      • Poissy, France, 78303
        • CHI Poissy Saint Germain en Laye
      • Rouen, France, 76044
        • Clinique St Hilaire
      • Soyaux, France, 16800
        • Centre Clinical
      • Toulouse, France, 31082
        • Clinique Ambroise Pare
      • Toulouse, France, 31077
        • Clinique Saint Jean Languedoc
      • Gunzenhausen, Germany, 91710
        • Frauenärzte im Seenland
      • Memmingen, Germany, 87700
        • Klinikum Memmingen
      • Worms, Germany, 67550
        • Klinikum Worms gGmbH
      • Aosta, Italy, 11100
        • Azienda USL Valle d'Aosta
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
        • Hospital Vall d'Hebron
      • Tarragona, Spain, 43005
        • Hospital Univeritario Joan XXIII
      • Valencia, Spain, 46026
        • Hospital la Fé
      • Valladolid, Spain, 47003
        • Hosital Clinico de Valladolid

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Female implanted with Altis Single Incision Sling System to treat stress urinary incontinence

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Implanted with Altis Single Incision Sling System

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refuses to be included in the survey or that their medical data will be used for research purposes
  • Indication for Altis Single Incision Sling System implantation is not for the treatment of female urinary incontinence.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Success
Time Frame: 12 months
Treatment success is a composite criterion defined in the protocol as condition improvement by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) reported as "a little better", "much better" or "very much better" and absence of serious or severe related Adverse Events (AEs) one year after implantation. As this definition of success was not restrictive enough, the Scientific Committee proposed a new definition for the treatment success for the statistical analysis, which was defined by PGI-I reported as "very much better" or "much better" and absence of any severe or serious or grade ≥ III of the Clavien-Dindo classification related AEs one year after implantation.
12 months
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time Frame: 12 months
PGI-I is one of the two outcome measures of the composite primary endpoint. It is a validated question that collects the patients' impression of improvement after the surgery. Among this 7 point-scale ("very much better", "much better", "a little better", "no change", "a little worse", "much worse" and "very much worse"), the patients are asked to check the one number that describes how their urinay tract condition is now, compared with how it's was before the surgery. The percentage of patients who describes "very much better" or "much better" or "little better" and the percentage of patients who describes "very much better" or "much better" were measured.
12 months
Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: 12 months
Related Adverse Events (AEs) are one of the two outcome measures of the composite primary endpoint. All AEs related or judged related to the procedure or the device were reported. The percentage of patients without any severe or serious related AEs and the percentage of patients without any severe or serious or grade ≥ III of the Clavien-Dindo classification related AEs were measured.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Treatment Success
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 24, 36 months
Treatment success is a composite criterion defined in the protocol as condition improvement by Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) reported as "a little better", "much better" or "very much better" and absence of serious or severe related adverse events one year after implantation. As this definition of success was not restrictive enough, the Scientific Committee proposed a new definition for the treatment success for the statistical analysis, which was defined by PGI-I reported as "very much better" or "much better" and absence of any severe or serious or grade ≥ III of the Clavien-Dindo classification related adverse event one year after implantation.
8 weeks, 24, 36 months
Cough Stress Test (CST)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months
CST provides the means for documenting stress urinary incontinence. CST is considered "positive" if any leakage is noted with cough or valsava. The percentage of patients with negative test was calculated at baseline, at the post-operative visit and at one year.
Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months
Post-void Residual (PVR) Volume
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months
Post-void residual (PVR) volume was collected pre- and post implant procedure up to 12 months. If the PVR volume was considered normal by the physician after the procedure, it was not necessary to collect this data at the subsequent follow-up visits.
Baseline, 8 weeks and 12 months
Pad Use
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12, 24 and 36 months
The number of pads used per patient per day was collected. Patients were considered to be pad free if they reported never wearing pads or wear pads just for a sense of security.
Baseline, 8 weeks, 12, 24 and 36 months
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-UI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12, 24 and 36 months
The ICIQ-UI Short Form is a seft-administred questionnaire to evaluate the frequency, severity and impact on quality of life of urinary incontinence. Question 1 asked, "How often do you leak urine?" Subjects were instructed to select among "none" (0), "about once a week or less often" (1), "2 or 3 times a week" (2), "about once a day" (3), "several times a day" (4), and "all the time" (5). Question 2 asked, "How much urine do you usually leak (whether you wear protection or not)?" Patients responded with "none" (0), "a small amount" (2), "a moderate amount" (4) or "a large amount (6). Question 3 asked, "Overall, how much does leaking urine interfere with your everyday life?" Participants chose a number from 0 (not at all) to 10 (a great deal). Question 1, 2 and 3 are summed to compute the total ICIQ score.The total score range is then a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21.
Baseline, 8 weeks, 12, 24 and 36 months
Subject Global Satisfaction Questionnaire
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 12, 24, 36 months
This non-validated questionnaire provides additional information concerning patient satisfaction. This survey consists of two questions: Question 1 "how satisfied are you with your surgery?". Among 5 point-scale (very satisfied, satisfied, not satisfied-not dissatisfied, dissatisfied and very dissatified), patient check the one items that best describes the subject satisfaction. We measured the percentage of patients who were very satisfied and satisfied. The patients answer the question "Do you recommend this operation to a friend?" by "yes" or "no". We measured the percentage of patients who answered "yes".
8 weeks, 12, 24, 36 months
Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12, 24, 36 months
The Incontinence quality of life questionnaire (I-QoL) is a validated survey questionnaire with 22 items that are scored on a 5-point Likert scale. The I-QOL and its subcale scores are computed by adding each item response, subtracting the lowest possible score and diving that sum by the possible raw score range. The scores are then transformed to have a range from 0 (maximum problem) to 100 (no problem at all).
Baseline, 8 weeks, 12, 24, 36 months
Impact on Sexual Function Assessed by the Pelvic Organ/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ 12)
Time Frame: Baseline, 8 weeks, 12, 24, 36 months
The Pelvic organ/urinary incontinence sexual questionnaire (PISQ-12) is a validated and reliable short form questionnaire including 12 questions that evaluates sexual function in heterosexual women with urinary incontinence and/or pelvic organ prolapse. Reponses are graded on a 5-point Likert scale from "never" to "always". The scores were calculated at each assessment visit.
Baseline, 8 weeks, 12, 24, 36 months
Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I)
Time Frame: 8 weeks, 24, 36 months
PGI-I is a validated question that collects the patients' impression of improvement after the surgery. Among this 7 point-scale ("very much better", "much better", "a little better", "no change", "a little worse", "much worse" and "very much worse"), the patients are asked to check the one number that describes how their urinay tract condition is now, compared with how it's was before the surgery. The percentage of patients who describes "very much better" or "much better" or "little better" was measured.
8 weeks, 24, 36 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Grégoire Capon, MD, CHU Pellegrin, Bordeaux, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 23, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 24, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 23, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 3, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

October 4, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 22, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Urinary Incontinence, Stress

Clinical Trials on Altis Single Incision Sling

Subscribe