- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04158401
Cervical Stiffness Measurement in Cervical Insufficiency
The goal of this cross sectional study is to evaluate the differences in cervical stiffness between patients who present for cerclage placement versus normal pregnancies.
The central hypothesis is that women for whom a cerclage is indicated will have cervical stiffness measurements lower than normal controls. Cervical stiffness will be objectively measured by the closing pressure Pcl using the Pregnolia measurement device. This is performed during a speculum exam by placing the measurement probe on the ectocervix.
In current clinical care, there is no objective measurement of cervical stiffness. An accurate measurement of cervical stiffness that correlates with clinical outcome will advance the field. Successful completion of the current study will spark future studies that correlate cervical stiffness pcl in a prospective study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02122
- Tufts Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant women over 18 years of age.
- Singleton gestation.
- Gestational ages between 12w0d and 22w6d.
- Candidates for cerclage
- Normal controls, which will be matched to cerclage subjects by gestational age and parity
Exclusion Criteria:
- Multiple gestation pregnancy.
- Pregnancy complications: Premature rupture of membranes, Placental abruption, Placenta previa/accreta.
- Chorioamnionitis
- Preterm contractions
- History of cervical surgery (LEEP, trachelectomy, conization).
- Mullarian anomaly
- Known carrier or HIV or Hepatitis B/C
- Active genital infection
- Communication problems (cognitively impaired adults unable to give consent)
- Cerclage placement already performed this pregnancy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Control group
Pregnant patients between 12w0d and 22w0d who present for prenatal care.
|
The Pregnolia measurement device (CE Mark for commercialization in the EU) will be used to measure the cervical stiffness (Pcl) on all subjects.
|
Cerclage group A
Patients who present for a history-indicated cerclage placement.
|
The Pregnolia measurement device (CE Mark for commercialization in the EU) will be used to measure the cervical stiffness (Pcl) on all subjects.
|
Cerclage group B
Patients who present for an ultrasound-indicated cerclage placement.
|
The Pregnolia measurement device (CE Mark for commercialization in the EU) will be used to measure the cervical stiffness (Pcl) on all subjects.
|
Cerclage group C
Patients who present for an exam-indicated cerclage placement.
|
The Pregnolia measurement device (CE Mark for commercialization in the EU) will be used to measure the cervical stiffness (Pcl) on all subjects.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Cervical stiffness (Pcl)
Time Frame: 5 minutes
|
The primary outcome will be cervical stiffness, Pcl in patients presenting for cerclage versus normal controls.
|
5 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Delivery data
Time Frame: up to 10 months
|
Patient delivery data including gestational age, mode of delivery and complications will be recorded
|
up to 10 months
|
Newborn outcomes
Time Frame: up to 10 months
|
Newborn outcomes including weight, APGARs and complications will be recorded
|
up to 10 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael House, MD, Tufts Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Mazza E, Nava A, Bauer M, Winter R, Bajka M, Holzapfel GA. Mechanical properties of the human uterine cervix: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal. 2006 Apr;10(2):125-36. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2005.06.001. Epub 2005 Sep 6.
- Lorenz JM. The outcome of extreme prematurity. Semin Perinatol. 2001 Oct;25(5):348-59. doi: 10.1053/sper.2001.27164.
- Goldenberg RL, Culhane JF, Iams JD, Romero R. Epidemiology and causes of preterm birth. Lancet. 2008 Jan 5;371(9606):75-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60074-4.
- Gilbert WM, Nesbitt TS, Danielsen B. The cost of prematurity: quantification by gestational age and birth weight. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;102(3):488-92. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(03)00617-3.
- Iams JD, Johnson FF, Sonek J, Sachs L, Gebauer C, Samuels P. Cervical competence as a continuum: a study of ultrasonographic cervical length and obstetric performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Apr;172(4 Pt 1):1097-103; discussion 1104-6. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91469-2.
- Beck S, Wojdyla D, Say L, Betran AP, Merialdi M, Requejo JH, Rubens C, Menon R, Van Look PF. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull World Health Organ. 2010 Jan;88(1):31-8. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.062554. Epub 2009 Sep 25.
- Mazza E, Parra-Saavedra M, Bajka M, Gratacos E, Nicolaides K, Deprest J. In vivo assessment of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix in pregnancy. Prenat Diagn. 2014 Jan;34(1):33-41. doi: 10.1002/pd.4260.
- Hollenstein M, Bugnard G, Joos R, Kropf S, Villiger P, Mazza E. Towards laparoscopic tissue aspiration. Med Image Anal. 2013 Dec;17(8):1037-45. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2013.06.001. Epub 2013 Jun 19.
- Badir S, Bajka M, Mazza E. A novel procedure for the mechanical characterization of the uterine cervix during pregnancy. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013 Nov;27:143-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.11.020. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
- Badir S, Mazza E, Zimmermann R, Bajka M. Cervical softening occurs early in pregnancy: characterization of cervical stiffness in 100 healthy women using the aspiration technique. Prenat Diagn. 2013 Aug;33(8):737-41. doi: 10.1002/pd.4116. Epub 2013 Apr 29.
- Bauer M, Mazza E, Jabareen M, Sultan L, Bajka M, Lang U, Zimmermann R, Holzapfel GA. Assessment of the in vivo biomechanical properties of the human uterine cervix in pregnancy using the aspiration test: a feasibility study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2009 May;144 Suppl 1:S77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.02.025. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
- Bauer M, Mazza E, Nava A, Zeck W, Eder M, Bajka M, Cacho F, Lang U, Holzapfel GA. In vivo characterization of the mechanics of human uterine cervices. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Apr;1101:186-202. doi: 10.1196/annals.1389.004. Epub 2007 Mar 15.
- Mazza E, Nava A, Hahnloser D, Jochum W, Bajka M. The mechanical response of human liver and its relation to histology: an in vivo study. Med Image Anal. 2007 Dec;11(6):663-72. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2007.06.010. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No.142: Cerclage for the management of cervical insufficiency. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Feb;123(2 Pt 1):372-379. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000443276.68274.cc.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 13549
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Preterm Birth
-
Thomas Jefferson UniversityCompleted
-
PreTeL, IncDuke University; University of RochesterRecruitingPreterm Birth | Threatened Preterm Labor | PreTerm LaborUnited States
-
Federico II UniversityRecruiting
-
University of OxfordShoklo Malaria Research UnitCompleted
-
e-Bio CorpRecruitingPreterm Labor | PreTerm Birth | Preterm Labor With Delivery NosUnited States
-
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child...CompletedPregnancy | Preterm Birth | Preterm LaborUnited States
-
University Hospital Inselspital, BerneAmniSure International LLCCompletedPreterm Birth | Preterm LabourSwitzerland
-
Chelsea and Westminster NHS Foundation TrustSPD Development Company Limited; Borne CharityRecruitingPreterm Birth | Preterm Labor | Preterm Birth Complication | Preterm Premature Rupture of Membrane | Preterm PregnancyUnited Kingdom
-
Cairo UniversityCompleted
-
University of OklahomaCompletedPreTerm Birth | PreTerm NeonateUnited States
Clinical Trials on Pregnolia
-
Pregnolia AGRecruitingCervix; PregnancySwitzerland
-
David ScheinerUniversitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven; Swiss Federal Institute of TechnologyCompletedPreterm DeliverySwitzerland, Belgium
-
Federico II UniversityRecruiting
-
Pregnolia AGCompleted
-
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam...Pregnolia AGRecruitingPremature Birth | Preterm Birth | Diagnosis | Threatened Preterm Labor | Cervical Incompetence in Pregnancy as Antepartum Condition | Premature Labor | Cervical Incompetence, With DeliveryNetherlands
-
Asklepios proresearchAG PregnoliaRecruiting