Quadratus Lumborum Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery

February 11, 2024 updated by: Olfa kaabachi, MD, University Tunis El Manar

Caudal Epidural Block Compared to Anterior Quadratus Lumborum Block for Pediatric Hip Surgery

Caudal blockade (CB) is one of the most frequently performed regional anaesthetic techniques in children. It's an efficient way to offer perioperative analgesia for painful sub-umbilical interventions but with high incidence of motor block and urinary retention. In one study, psoas compartment block was associated with less morphine comsumption and prolonged duration of analgesia compared to single-shot caudal Block in small children undergoing open hip reduction/osteotomies. Ultasound guided anterior Quadratus lumborum block (AQLB) provides unilateral analgesia to the nerves between the psoas muscle (PM) and the quadratus lumborum muscle (QLM). The first pediatric study evaluating Quadratus lumborum block is encouraging .

The first pediatric study evaluating Quadratus lumborum block is encouraging. To the best of the investigator's knowledge, there are no previously published data comparing the AQLB with other regional techniques in infants undergoing hip surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of this prospective randomized study was to compare the analgesic effects between AQLB and CB in children undergoing unilateral open hip reduction/osteotomies for hip dislocation.

Patients were randomly assigned, into 1 of 2 groups, namely, group CB (n = 20) and group AQLB (n = 20).

Preoperatively all children were premedicated by using oral midazolam (0 .5mg/kg).

anesthesia was induced with 3 to 4% sevoflurane and 50% with 60% nitrous oxide in oxygen.Then fentanyl 3 μg/kg and Propofol 1 - 2mg/Kg were administered for anesthesia induction. Airway was secured with endotracheal tube placed in the mouth facilited by 0.15 mg/kg cistracurium. Anesthesia maintenance was performed with sevoflurane 2% in 50% nitrous oxide.

AQLB and CB were done with 1 ml/kg, 0.25% Ropivacaine (maximum dose limited to 20 ml)

Postoperative follow-up:

All patients received 15 mg/kg paracetamol before extubation. Tramadol 2 mg/kg intravenous was planned as rescue analgesia when CHEOPS score was more than 3. Supplemental IV tramado, 1 mg/kg could be added if necessary every 6 hours.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Tunis, Tunisia, 2010
        • Institut Kassab D'Orthopedie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 months to 5 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 2 to 7 years old
  • Weight ≤ 20 Kg
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II
  • Planned to undergo unilateral open hip reduction/osteotomies

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cerebral palsy with severe intellectual disability
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Local or general infection
  • Allergy to amide local anesthetics.
  • Progressive neurological disorders
  • Parenteral refusal
  • Spinal dysraphism
  • Cutaneous anomalies (angioma, hair truft, naevus or a dimple)near to the puncture

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: CAUDAL BLOCK
Sonosite machine (M-Turbo) equipped with a large bandwidth, a multifrequency linear probe (6-19 MHz) and needle of diameter and length respectively between 22G and 25G, 35mm and 40mm according to the child's size (Braun).The patient is positioned laterally with their hips flexed to 90°. The sacral hiatus is forming with the two posterior superior iliac spines an equilateral triangle. The puncture is performed between the two sacral cornuae. The sacrococcygeal ligament gives a perceptible 'pop' when crossed. After crossing the sacro-coccygeal ligament, the needle is redirected 30° to the skin surface, and then advanced a few millimeters into sacral canal. After verifying absence of spontaneous reflux of blood or cerebrospinal fluid, slowly injection of Ropivacaine 0.25% 1ml/ kg
ultrasound guided caudal block with 1 ml/kg 0.2% ropivacaine
Experimental: anterior Quadratus lumborum block
Sonosite machine (M-Turbo) equipped with a large bandwidth, a multifrequency linear probe (6-19 MHz) and a 22G, 50-mm, insulated facet type needle (BBraun Stimuplex Ultra 360°). Patients were placed in the lateral position, a probe was placed transversely to the abdominal flank. The needle was inserted using an in-plane technique and was preceded further into the fascia between the QLM and PM. Following confirmation of the correct space with the administration of 0.5-1 ml local anesthetic, block was induced with 1 ml/kg, 0.25% Ropivacaine,
ultrasound anterior quadratum lumborum block with 1 ml/kg 0.2% ropivacaine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
analgesics consumption
Time Frame: day one
total tramadol consumption
day one

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain score
Time Frame: day one
Children's Hospital Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) [4=no pain ; 13=worst pain]
day one
analgesic rescue
Time Frame: Day one
time to first analgesic rescue
Day one

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: khaireddine Raddaoui, MD, Tunis El Manar University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 13, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on caudal block

3
Subscribe