Postoperative Benefits of Intraoperative Nociception Level (NOL) Titration - Pilot

May 2, 2021 updated by: Medasense Biometrics Ltd

Postoperative Benefits of Intraoperative NOL Titration - Pilot

Previous work has shown that NOL (Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel) accurately quantifies nociception during general anesthesia. Presumably, titrating opioids to NOL will therefore provide individual guidance so that patients will be given about the right amount. Patient given the right amount will presumably awaken quickly when anesthesia is done, and have good initial pain control in the post anesthesia care unit (PACU). To the extent that NOL titration facilitates optimal opioid dosing, patients are likely to have better PACU experiences - which would be an important outcome that clinicians and regulators are likely to take seriously.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adults having major non-cardiac surgery expected to last ≥2 hours;
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status 1-3;
  3. Age 21-85 years old;
  4. Planned endotracheal intubation

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Planned neuraxial or regional block;
  2. Local anesthetic infiltration at surgical field;
  3. Clinician preference for an opioid other than, or in addition to, fentanyl;
  4. Non-sinus heart rhythm;
  5. Neurologic condition that, in the opinion of the investigators, may preclude accurate assessment of postoperative pain and nausea;
  6. Lack of English language fluency;
  7. Routine user of psychoactive drugs other than opioids;
  8. Contraindication to sevoflurane, fentanyl, morphine, or ondansetron.
  9. Intracranial surgery
  10. BMI > 40

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Routine opioid management
Clinicians will be blinded to NOL monitoring and use clinical judgement to determine how much fentanyl should be given, and when
Clinical judgement will be according to their standard practice and may include interpretation of blood pressure, heart rate, diaphoresis, tearing, and pupil size. Boluses of fentanyl 50 µg can be given per clinical judgement
Experimental: NOL-guided opioid administration
Clinicians will titrate fentanyl to keep NOL under 25 - always using good clinical judgement for individual patients
NOL values exceeding 25 will typically be treated with boluses of fentanyl 50 µg at roughly 5-minute intervals. The target will be maintained until surgery ends
Other Names:
  • Physiological Monitoring Device: PMD-200 system

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PACU pain score
Time Frame: 60 minutes during recovery
Average pain scores (0-10 verbal response scale) at 10-minute intervals during the initial 60 minutes of recovery are more often between 1 and 3 or significantly lower with NOL-guided fentanyl than with routine care
60 minutes during recovery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 9, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 9, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 12, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 6, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nociceptive Pain

Clinical Trials on Routine opioid management

Subscribe