Predictors of Clinical Course and Treatment Response in DBT Programmes

March 21, 2023 updated by: Lars Mehlum, Oslo University Hospital

Predictors of Clinical Course and Treatment Response in Patients Having Received Dialectical Behaviour Therapy Delivered by Clinical Units in the Norwegian Network for Clinical Evaluation and Quality in DBT Programmes

The project is a collaboration between The National Centre for Suicide Research and Prevention (NSSF) and clinical units with Dialectical Behaviour Therapy (DBT) programmes. A methodological and technological platform has been established that enables clinicians to deliver high quality treatments over extended periods of time, to evaluate their own performance and productivity and to report it in a uniform and systematic way that will enable comparison across clinical settings and programmes. The collected data constitute the basis for conducting the clinical study with the overall aim to study predictors of the clinical course and treatment response in patients admitted to DBT programmes in Norway.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the project is to collect data from systematic and uniform clinical assessments to study predictors of the clinical course and treatment response in patients admitted to and treated in clinical units delivering Dialectical Behaviour Therapy in Norway.

Aims and research questions:

The study will address the following main research questions:

  1. Which patient characteristics (sociodemographic variables, psychiatric diagnoses/comorbidities, previous suicidal and self-harming behaviour, previous treatment history), predict a favourable clinical course and treatment response?
  2. Which factors mediate the clinical change in key outcomes such as a) target symptom levels (depression, hopelessness, suicidal ideation, borderline symptoms etc.), b) function levels (emotion regulation capacity, use of coping skills, social functioning, occupational / academic performance level etc.), c) problem behaviours (suicide attempts, non-suicidal self-harm, substance abuse, eating disorder symptoms etc.), d) global functioning and e) the use of emergency treatment services.
  3. What are significant moderators of treatment response with respect to key clinical outcomes (mentioned above)?
  4. Which of the treatment modalities are evaluated as the most salient and helpful by patients who receive the treatment according to their age, gender, psychiatric diagnoses and previous treatment history?

Methods:

A uniform protocol for psychiatric diagnostics and clinical assessment of patients who receive treatment at the participating clinical units will be used. Since some participating clinical units will treat adult patients and some will treat children and adolescents, the protocol will offer assessment instrument suitable for the specific age group whenever this is relevant. The evaluation system includes assessments at baseline before treatment starts, evaluation at several time points during the treatment period, at termination of treatment and at follow-up. Assessments will be made both through interviews and ratings made by therapists and through self-report from patients.

Self-reports will be filled out electronically by patients, on tablets stationed at each participating clinical unit. At intervals patients will also provide self-rated information on dimensions such as emotions, cognitions and impulsive behaviour several times per day through a mobile app developed specifically for the purpose, so-called Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA). Interview data and ratings will be entered into the database by each clinician to tablets in a similar fashion as self-report data from patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Moss, Norway, 1535
      • Oslo, Norway, 1281
        • Recruiting
        • Søndre Oslo DPS/Oslo Universitetssykehus HF
        • Contact:
      • Sandnessjøen, Norway, 8800
      • Sandvika, Norway, 1341
        • Recruiting
        • Bjerketun behandlingshjem/Vestreviken HF
        • Contact:
      • Trondheim, Norway, 7024

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • History of repeated deliberate self harm
  • Satisfies criteria of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-IV) Borderline Personality Disorder as measured by Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM (SCID-II) in addition to the self-destructive criterion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychotic disorders
  • Anorexia Nervosa
  • Substance dependence disorder
  • Mental retardation (IQ less than 70)
  • Asperger syndrome/autism

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dialectical Behaviour Therapy
Dialectical Behavior Therapy, delivered for 20 weeks for adolescents (DBT-A) or 52 weeks for adults (standard DBT.
DBT developed by Marsha Linehan (Linehan 1993a; 1993b) and adapted for adolescents (DBT-A) by Miller, Rathus & Linehan, 2007 consisting of 20 weeks of weekly individual therapy (60 minutes), multifamily skills training (120 minutes), family therapy sessions as needed and telephone coaching outside therapy sessions.
DBT developed by Marsha Linehan (Linehan 1993a, 1993 b) consisting of 1 weekly session of individual therapy (60 minutes), 1 weekly session of skills training (120 minutes), and telephone coaching with individual therapists outside therapy sessions as needed.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-harm behaviour
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Number of self-harm episodes (split on suicide attempts and non-suicidal self-harm)
4 weeks
Suicidal Ideation (adolescents)
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Suicidal Ideation Questionnaire (SIQ-Jr). Min=0, Max=90. Higher scores indicate worse outcome
2 weeks
Depressive symptoms
Time Frame: 1 week
MADRS (Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale).Min=0, Max=60. Higher scores indicate worse outcome
1 week
Suicidal Ideation (adults)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Beck Scale for Suicidal Ideation (BSS). MIn=0, Max=38. Higher scores indicate worse outcome
4 weeks
Depressive symptoms (adolescents)
Time Frame: 1 week
Moods and Feelings Questionnaire (MFQ). Min=0, Max=26. Higher scores indicate worse outcome
1 week
Depressive symptoms (adults)
Time Frame: 1 week
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). Min=0, Max=63. Higher scores indicate worse outcome
1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Borderline Symptoms
Time Frame: 1 week
Borderline Symptom List (BSL-23). Min=0, Max=92. Higher scores indicate more symptoms.
1 week
Hopelessness
Time Frame: 1 week
Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS). Min=0, Max=20. Higher scores indicate more hopelessness.
1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lars Mehlum, MD PhD, University of Oslo

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Linehan, M.M. (1993a). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press
  • Linehan, M.M. (1993b). Skills training manual for treating borderline personality disorder. New York: Guilford Press
  • Miller, A.L., Rathus J.H., Linehan, M.M. (2007). Dialectical behavioral therapy with suicidal adolescents. New York: Guilford Press

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 20, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 24, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Borderline Personality Disorder

Clinical Trials on Dialectical Behaviour Therapy adapted for adolescents (DBT-A)

3
Subscribe