Ibuprofen and Neural Mobilization Treatment in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

December 3, 2025 updated by: Francisco Unda Solano, Universidad Europea de Madrid

Pain Reduction and Changes in Upper Limb Function Produced by Over the Counter Oral Ibuprofen and Median Nerve Neural Mobilization Versus the Lack of Treatment, in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.

In the present investigation, the pain reduction effect of median nerve neural mobilization and oral ibuprofen treatments will be compared to those produced by the absence of treatment, in subjects who suffer the signs and symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present randomized clinical trial will perform a comparison of the pain reduction effects produced by median nerve neural mobilization and oral ibuprofen treatments to the total lack of treatment in subjects diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome. Effects over the functionality of the affected upper limb will be evaluated and compared. Subjects will be invited to participate and randomly allocated to 3 different groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

123

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Carabobo
      • Valencia, Carabobo, Venezuela, 02001
        • Ciudad Hospitalaria Enrique Tejera

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants must be medically diagnosed with unilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (with confirmative electrodiagnostic findings).
  • Full understanding of written and spoken Spanish (language).
  • Participants must freely consent to participate.
  • The presence of positive Phalen and Tinel signs.
  • The presence of carpal tunnel syndrome signs and symptoms.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The lack to meet inclusion criterions.
  • The presence of cognitive impairment.
  • Tumors.
  • Cancer.
  • Upper limb surgery or trauma.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Deformities of the (affected) upper limb.
  • Recent skin injuries or infections (in the affected upper limb).
  • Autoimmune inflammatory conditions or flu type symptoms.
  • Allergy (or contraindication) to non steroidal anti inflammatory drugs (NSAID)
  • Participants must not be (during the present investigation) under any type of pain reducing treatment (conservative, homeopathic, invasive or not invasive).
  • Metabolic neuropathy.
  • Obesity (body mass index over 30).
  • Participants who are not employed.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Ibuprofen
Oral tablet pharmaceutical treatment. Participants will be treated with a maximum of 1200 mg per day, subdivided in 3 intakes of 400 mg each 8 hours during a time lapse of 4 weeks.
oral tablet
Other Names:
  • Advil
No Intervention: Control group
Waiting list control group. Participants that belong to the no intervention arm will be assigned to a waiting list to receive treatment. The participants will not receive treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome during a time lapse of 4 weeks. After this period of time, participants will begin the best treatment available.
Experimental: Median nerve neural mobilization
Median nerve neural mobilization non pharmaceutical, non invasive, physiotherapy technique; which consists of a passive and repetitive upper limb movement that seeks to induced median nerve gliding and incursions against surrounding connective tissue. Subjects will be treated 5 days per week during a total time lapse of 4 weeks.
Manual therapy maneuver performed in the upper limb

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distal upper limb pain
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment) and 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
Assessed through the visual analog scale (VAS). The VAS is a psychometric response scale. It is a measurement instrument for subjective characteristics or attitudes that cannot be directly measured.The VAS is the most frequently used method to assess pain intensity. The scale will be displayed as a horizontal 100-mm line labelled at each end by descriptors such as 'no pain' (the minimum and best outcome possible) and 'worse pain ever' (maximum and worst outcome possible). The participant will mark the line to indicate pain severity and it is simply quantified by measuring the distance in millimeters from 0 (no pain) to the patient's marked rating.
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment) and 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Upper limb function
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment
Assessed through the quick Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionary (QuickDASH), which is a shortened version of the 30-item Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) instrument.The instrument administered to the participants will be a self-report questionnaire, that will rate the difficulty and interference of daily life on a 5 point Likert scale. At least 10 of the 11 items must be completed for a score to be calculated and the scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment
Work Status at baseline
Time Frame: Measured immediately before the application of the first treatment
This measure is performed through the employed participant (full-time or part-time) answering in a dichotomous manner (yes or no) the question: "Do you currently work?"
Measured immediately before the application of the first treatment
Work Status post treatment
Time Frame: Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
This measure is performed through the employed participant (full-time or part-time) answering in a dichotomous manner (yes or no) the question: "Do you currently work?"
Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
Change in Work Task (Job Type)
Time Frame: Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
This measure is performed through the employed participant (full-time or part-time) answering in a dichotomous manner (yes or no) the question: "Did you change your job type or task?"
Measured immediatly after the application of the last treatment.
Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-17 (TSK-17)
Time Frame: Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment.
The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-17 (TSK-17) is a 17-item questionnaire designed to assess the fear of movement and re-injury (kinesiophobia). Items are rated on a 4-point Likert scale (ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"), yielding a total score that reflects the severity of pain-related fear avoidance beliefs. It's a widely used and vailidaded clinical and research instrument. The standard total score range for the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-17) is 17 to 68. It is calculated by summing 17 items, each scored 1-4, with four items reverse-scored. Higher scores indicate greater fear of movement.
Changes from baseline (measured immediately before the application of the first treatment), and at 60 minutes after the application of the last treatment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Carlos Perez, MD, INSALUD

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 23, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 26, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

December 29, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 29, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 31, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Median nerve neural mobilization

Subscribe