- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04349618
Ultraprotective Ventilation Without Extracorporeal Circulation During COVID 19 Pneumonia (VT4COVID)
Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultraprotective Ventilation Without Extracorporeal Circulation in Patients With COVID 19 Pneumonia and Moderate to Severe ARDS
Mortality of COVID-19 pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is extremely high in preliminary reports amounting to 50-60%. Duration of mechanical ventilation in these patients appears to exceed standard duration of mechanical ventilation in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients, suggesting that COVID-19 patients may be particularly at risk for ventilator-induced lung injury. Treatment of COVID-19 ARDS patients is to date mainly supportive with protective mechanical ventilation (ventilation with low tidal volume (VT) i.e. 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) and plateau pressure control below 30 cm H2O).
Mechanical ventilation with VT reduction below 6 ml/kg PBW in ARDS may reduce alveolar strain, driving pressure and hence ventilator-induced lung injury. Investigators recently performed a multicenter pilot study on 34 moderately severe to severe ARDS patients. This study demonstrated that ultraprotective ventilation with ultra-low VT (≤4.2 ml/kg PBW) without extracorporeal circulation may be applied in approximately 2/3 of the patients, with a 4 cmH2O median reduction in driving pressure, at the price of transient episodes of severe acidosis in approximately 1/3 of the patients. Investigators hypothesized that ultraprotective ventilation without extracorporeal circulation may reduce the mortality at day-90 and increase the number of days free from mechanical ventilation (VFD) at day-60, as compared to protective ventilation.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation CHU Gabriel Montpied
-
La Tronche, France, 38700
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Hôpital Michallon - CHU Grenoble Alpes
-
Lyon, France, 69003
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Hôpital Edouard Herriot Hospices Civils de Lyon
-
Lyon, France, 69003
- Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale Hôpital Edouard Herriot Hospices Civils de Lyon
-
Lyon, France, 69004
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Hôpital de la Croix Rousse Hospices Civils de Lyon
-
Lyon, France, 69004
- Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale Hôpital de la Croix Rousse Hospices Civils de Lyon
-
Lyon, France, 69007
- Service de réanimation Polyvalente Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph-Saint Luc
-
Lyon, France, 69009
- Service de Réanimation Clinique de la Sauvegarde
-
Pierre-Bénite, France, 69310
- Service de Réanimation Polyvalente Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud Hospices Civils de Lyon
-
Pringy, France, 74374
- Service de Réanimation Centre hospitalier Annecy Genevois
-
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France, 42055
- Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Hôpital Nord - CHU Saint-Etienne
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18 years or older
- ARDS according to the Berlin definition
- COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by RT-PCR
- Acute respiratory failure not fully explained by left ventricular failure or sodium overload
- Bilateral pulmonary radiological opacities not fully explained by pleural effusions or atelectasis or nodules
- Invasive mechanical ventilation with PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 150 mm Hg and PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O with a tidal volume below or equal to 6 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight
- Continuous intravenous sedation as part of ARDS treatment
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion criteria related to ARDS history
- ARDS onset more than 48 hours before inclusion
- previous inclusion in present study
Exclusion criteria related to ARDS severity or complications
- arterial pH < 7.21 despite respiratory rate set to 35/min at the time of inclusion
- patient under any extracorporeal CO2 removal technique or ECMO
- pneumothorax or bronchopleural fistula
Exclusion criteria related to comorbidities
- suspected intracranial hypertension
- severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease defined by a GOLD score ≥ 3
- chronic respiratory failure under home oxygen or non-invasive ventilation
- chronic respiratory failure requiring long term oxygen or non-invasive ventilation
- obesity with body weight over height ratio greater than 1 kg/cm
- sickle cell disease
- bone marrow transplant < 6 months
- burn injury with extension greater than 30% of body surface area
- cirrhosis with Child-Pugh score C
- advance directives to withhold or withdraw life sustaining treatment
Exclusion criteria related to legislation
- Patient under an exclusion period relative to participation to another clinical trial, or inclusion into a clinical trial interfering with the ventilatory strategies
- pregnancy, lactating women
- patient under a legal protective measure.
- lack of affiliation to social security as required by French regulation
- lack of written informed consent by patient or next of kin (unless if recourse to the emergency procedure in the absence of a loved one)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: PROTECTIVE VENTILATION
Protective ventilation with tidal volume 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight
|
Protective ventilation with tidal volume 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight further adjusted to keep plateau pressure below 30 cm H2O and pH above 7.20, and PEEP set using the PEEP FiO2 table of the ARMA trial
|
|
Experimental: ULTRAPROTECTIVE VENTILATION
Ultraprotective ventilation with tidal volume reduction down to 4 mL/kg further adjusted to keep plateau pressure below 30 cm H2O and pH above 7.20
|
Ultraprotective ventilation with tidal volume reduction down to 4 mL/kg further adjusted to keep plateau pressure below 30 cm H2O and pH above 7.20, and PEEP set using the PEEP FiO2 table of the ARMA trial
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
A composite score based on all-cause mortality and the number of ventilator free-days (VFD)
Time Frame: Day 90
|
For an alive patient at day 90, the score will be built as follow: a value +1 will be given for comparisons to dead patients and alive patients with a lower number of VFD.
For comparisons to alive patients with a higher number of VFD a value -1 will be given and in case of identical number of VFD a value 0 will be given.
For a dead patient a value -1 will be given for comparisons to alive patients and 0 for comparisons to dead patients.
For a given patients the score will correspond to the sum of values resulting to the comparison to all patients of the other group.
A higher score indicates a more favorable result.
|
Day 90
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause mortality (intention to treat)
Time Frame: 90-day after inclusion
|
All-cause mortality with analysis in intention to treat, i.e. each patient will be analyzed in his initial randomization group regardless of whether the allocated strategy was effectively applied or not.
|
90-day after inclusion
|
|
Ventilator-free days (VFD)
Time Frame: day 60 after inclusion
|
VFD will be computed as follows from the day of inclusion: VFD= 0 if the patient dies between inclusion and day 60 VFD = 60-x if the patient is successfully weaned from invasive mechanical ventilation x days after inclusion. Successful weaning from mechanical ventilation is defined by extubation without reintubation within at least 48 hours (or weaning from mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in patients with tracheostomy) VFD= 0 if the patient is mechanically ventilated for more than 60 days after inclusion |
day 60 after inclusion
|
|
All-cause mortality with per protocol analysis
Time Frame: 90-day
|
Per protocol analysis will be carried out by comparing the group of patients in whom median daily tidal volume from inclusion to weaning of deep sedation will be lower of equal to 4.2 ml/kg of predicted body weight to the group of patients in whom median tidal volume from inclusion to weaning of deep sedation will be greater than 4.2 ml/kg of predicted body weight, whatever the patients' initial randomization group. Weaning of deep sedation is defined by a Richmond Agitation Sedation (RASS) score greater than -3 for at least 48 hours. |
90-day
|
|
Time to successful extubation
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Successful extubation is defined by extubation without reintubation within at least 48 hours (or weaning from mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in patients with tracheostomy) Data will be right censored at 60 days and death will be taken into account as a competing risk.
|
60 days
|
|
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Data will be right censored at 90 days and death will be taken into account as a competing risk.
|
90 days
|
|
Respiratory parameters assessed daily from inclusion to weaning of deep sedation or 14 days whichever comes first
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Weaning of deep sedation is defined by a Richmond Agitation Sedation (RASS) score greater than -3 for at least 48 hours.
|
14 days
|
|
Daily sedation dose during the first 14 days of the study
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Doses of the following drugs used for deep sedation will be assessed daily: midazolam, propofol and opioid.
Opioid dose will be expressed as morphine equivalent with the following conversion factor: 1µg of sufentanil = 10 µg of fentanyl = 1 mg of morphine
|
14 days
|
|
Rate of use of rescue therapies
Time Frame: 14 days
|
Rescue therapies are any therapy among the following ones: neuromuscular blocking agents, prone position, nitric oxide, recruitment maneuvers, ECMO
|
14 days
|
|
Incidence density rate of severe mixed acidosis
Time Frame: ICU stay
|
Severe mixed acidosis is defined by the association of pH<7.15 and PaCO2>45 mm Hg.
|
ICU stay
|
|
Incidence density rate of ventilator associated pneumonia
Time Frame: ICU stay
|
Ventilator associated pneumonia will be defined as any pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation after inclusion.
|
ICU stay
|
|
Incidence density rate of acute cor pulmonale
Time Frame: ICU stay
|
Acute cor pulmonale is defined by the association of right ventricle dilatation (right ventricle surface / left ventricle surface >0,6) and septal dyskinesia assessed by echocardiography
|
ICU stay
|
|
Incidence density rate of barotrauma
Time Frame: ICU stay
|
Barotrauma is defined by any pneumothorax OR pneumomediastinum OR subcutaneous emphysema, OR pneumatocele of more than 2 cm detected on image examinations.
|
ICU stay
|
|
Incidence density rate of any serious adverse events
Time Frame: ICU stay
|
Serious adverse event is any life threatening event OR any event resulting in death.
|
ICU stay
|
|
Cognitive impairment assessed by phone call using the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) test
Time Frame: Day 365 after inclusion
|
The Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment score will be assessed by phone call.
The total score ranges from 0 to 30; higher scores being associated to a better outcome.
|
Day 365 after inclusion
|
|
Quality of life assessed by the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) score
Time Frame: Day 365 after inclusion
|
The RAND 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) score will be assessed by phone call.
The score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores being associated to a better outcome.
|
Day 365 after inclusion
|
|
Post-traumatic stress disorder assessed by the Impact of Event Scale - revised (IES-R) score by phone call
Time Frame: Day 365 after inclusion
|
The Impact of Event Scale - revised (IES-R) score will be assessed by phone call.
The total score ranges from 0 to 88; higher scores being associated to a worse outcome.
|
Day 365 after inclusion
|
|
Cost-efficacy ratio of the innovative strategy compared to the reference strategy
Time Frame: Day 90 after inclusion
|
The cost-efficacy ratio will be computed as the ratio of cost difference on efficacy difference between the intervention arm and the reference arm.
The costs taken into account will be the direct hospitalized costs.
The efficacy will be assessed as the number of days alive free from mechanical ventilation.
|
Day 90 after inclusion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Richard JC, Yonis H, Bitker L, Roche S, Wallet F, Dupuis C, Serrier H, Argaud L, Thiery G, Delannoy B, Pommier C, Abraham P, Muller M, Aubrun F, Sigaud F, Rigault G, Joffredo E, Mezidi M, Terzi N, Rabilloud M. Open-label randomized controlled trial of ultra-low tidal ventilation without extracorporeal circulation in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and moderate to severe ARDS: study protocol for the VT4COVID trial. Trials. 2021 Oct 11;22(1):692. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05665-z.
- Richard JC, Terzi N, Yonis H, Chorfa F, Wallet F, Dupuis C, Argaud L, Delannoy B, Thiery G, Pommier C, Abraham P, Muller M, Sigaud F, Rigault G, Joffredo E, Mezidi M, Souweine B, Baboi L, Serrier H, Rabilloud M, Bitker L; VT4COVID collaborators. Ultra-low tidal volume ventilation for COVID-19-related ARDS in France (VT4COVID): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Nov;11(11):991-1002. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00221-7. Epub 2023 Jul 12.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 69HCL20_0322
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pneumonia
-
King Edward Memorial HospitalCompletedNosocomial Pneumonia | Healthcare-Associated Pneumonia | Aspiration Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated PneumoniaIndia
-
Melinta Therapeutics, Inc.WithdrawnHospital-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Bacterial Pneumonia | Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia
-
Venatorx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Biomedical Advanced Research and Development AuthorityWithdrawnHospital-acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
-
Universidad de la SabanaClínica Universidad de La Sabana; Universidad de La Sabana, ColombiaCompletedPneumococcal Pneumonia | Community Acquired Pneumonia (CAP)Colombia
-
Hannover Medical SchoolCharite University, Berlin, Germany; University of LeipzigUnknownCOVID-19 | Bacterial Pneumonia | Viral Pneumonia | Pneumonia Due to Streptococcus Pneumoniae | Pneumonia Due to H. Influenzae | Pneumonia, Organism Unspecified | Pneumonia in Diseases Classified Elsewhere | Pneumonia Due to Other Specified Infectious OrganismsGermany
-
Nantes University HospitalSociété Française d'Anesthésie et de RéanimationCompletedPneumonia | Sepsis | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia | Hospital Acquired PneumoniaFrance
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaUniversity of Ljubljana, Faculty of MedicineUnknownCommunity Acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator Associated Pneumonia | Hospital Acquired PneumoniaSlovenia
-
PfizerCompletedVentilator-associated Pneumonia (VAP) | Nosocomial Pneumonia (NP)Bulgaria, France, Italy, Korea, Republic of, Mexico, Peru, Poland, Russian Federation, Spain, Turkey, United Kingdom, Vietnam, Philippines, China, Ukraine, Argentina, Brazil, Hungary, Romania, India, Japan, Taiwan, Latvia, Czechia, Slov... and more
-
Arpida AGTerminatedHospital-Acquired Pneumonia | Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia | Health-Care-Associated Pneumonia
-
ShionogiCompletedHospital Acquired Pneumonia (HAP) | Healthcare-associated Pneumonia (HCAP) | Ventilator Associated Pneumonia (VAP)Israel, Spain, United States, Belgium, Canada, Czechia, Estonia, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Latvia, Philippines, Puerto Rico, Russian Federation, Serbia, Taiwan, Ukraine
Clinical Trials on PROTECTIVE VENTILATION
-
Xuzhou Medical UniversityUnknownInflammation | Thoracic Surgery | Pulmonary ComplicationChina
-
The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical UniversityUnknownThoracic Surgery | Pulmonary ComplicationChina
-
Laval UniversityRecruitingMechanical Ventilation Complication | ARDS, Human | Humidifier LungCanada
-
Duke UniversityCompletedARDS | Acute Respiratory FailureUnited States
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedInflammation | Mechanical Ventilation Complication | Thoracic SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
Reinier de Graaf GroepRecruitingMechanical Ventilation | Intensive Care (ICU)Netherlands, Spain
-
Konkuk University Medical CenterUnknownValvular Heart Disease
-
IRCCS San RaffaeleCompleted
-
University Hospital, MontpellierRecruiting
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityTerminatedAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Acute Lung Injury | Mechanical VentilationUnited States