Ultraprotective Ventilation Without Extracorporeal Circulation During COVID 19 Pneumonia (VT4COVID)

December 3, 2025 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultraprotective Ventilation Without Extracorporeal Circulation in Patients With COVID 19 Pneumonia and Moderate to Severe ARDS

Mortality of COVID-19 pneumonia with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is extremely high in preliminary reports amounting to 50-60%. Duration of mechanical ventilation in these patients appears to exceed standard duration of mechanical ventilation in non-COVID-19 ARDS patients, suggesting that COVID-19 patients may be particularly at risk for ventilator-induced lung injury. Treatment of COVID-19 ARDS patients is to date mainly supportive with protective mechanical ventilation (ventilation with low tidal volume (VT) i.e. 6 ml/kg of predicted body weight (PBW) and plateau pressure control below 30 cm H2O).

Mechanical ventilation with VT reduction below 6 ml/kg PBW in ARDS may reduce alveolar strain, driving pressure and hence ventilator-induced lung injury. Investigators recently performed a multicenter pilot study on 34 moderately severe to severe ARDS patients. This study demonstrated that ultraprotective ventilation with ultra-low VT (≤4.2 ml/kg PBW) without extracorporeal circulation may be applied in approximately 2/3 of the patients, with a 4 cmH2O median reduction in driving pressure, at the price of transient episodes of severe acidosis in approximately 1/3 of the patients. Investigators hypothesized that ultraprotective ventilation without extracorporeal circulation may reduce the mortality at day-90 and increase the number of days free from mechanical ventilation (VFD) at day-60, as compared to protective ventilation.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

220

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Clermont-Ferrand, France, 63003
        • Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation CHU Gabriel Montpied
      • La Tronche, France, 38700
        • Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Hôpital Michallon - CHU Grenoble Alpes
      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Hôpital Edouard Herriot Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale Hôpital Edouard Herriot Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Lyon, France, 69004
        • Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Hôpital de la Croix Rousse Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Lyon, France, 69004
        • Service de Réanimation Chirurgicale Hôpital de la Croix Rousse Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Lyon, France, 69007
        • Service de réanimation Polyvalente Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph-Saint Luc
      • Lyon, France, 69009
        • Service de Réanimation Clinique de la Sauvegarde
      • Pierre-Bénite, France, 69310
        • Service de Réanimation Polyvalente Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud Hospices Civils de Lyon
      • Pringy, France, 74374
        • Service de Réanimation Centre hospitalier Annecy Genevois
      • Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France, 42055
        • Service de Médecine Intensive Réanimation Hôpital Nord - CHU Saint-Etienne

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • ARDS according to the Berlin definition
  • COVID-19 pneumonia confirmed by RT-PCR
  • Acute respiratory failure not fully explained by left ventricular failure or sodium overload
  • Bilateral pulmonary radiological opacities not fully explained by pleural effusions or atelectasis or nodules
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation with PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 150 mm Hg and PEEP ≥ 5 cm H2O with a tidal volume below or equal to 6 ml per kilogram of predicted body weight
  • Continuous intravenous sedation as part of ARDS treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria related to ARDS history

    • ARDS onset more than 48 hours before inclusion
    • previous inclusion in present study
  • Exclusion criteria related to ARDS severity or complications

    • arterial pH < 7.21 despite respiratory rate set to 35/min at the time of inclusion
    • patient under any extracorporeal CO2 removal technique or ECMO
    • pneumothorax or bronchopleural fistula
  • Exclusion criteria related to comorbidities

    • suspected intracranial hypertension
    • severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease defined by a GOLD score ≥ 3
    • chronic respiratory failure under home oxygen or non-invasive ventilation
    • chronic respiratory failure requiring long term oxygen or non-invasive ventilation
    • obesity with body weight over height ratio greater than 1 kg/cm
    • sickle cell disease
    • bone marrow transplant < 6 months
    • burn injury with extension greater than 30% of body surface area
    • cirrhosis with Child-Pugh score C
    • advance directives to withhold or withdraw life sustaining treatment
  • Exclusion criteria related to legislation

    • Patient under an exclusion period relative to participation to another clinical trial, or inclusion into a clinical trial interfering with the ventilatory strategies
    • pregnancy, lactating women
    • patient under a legal protective measure.
    • lack of affiliation to social security as required by French regulation
    • lack of written informed consent by patient or next of kin (unless if recourse to the emergency procedure in the absence of a loved one)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: PROTECTIVE VENTILATION
Protective ventilation with tidal volume 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight
Protective ventilation with tidal volume 6 mL/kg of predicted body weight further adjusted to keep plateau pressure below 30 cm H2O and pH above 7.20, and PEEP set using the PEEP FiO2 table of the ARMA trial
Experimental: ULTRAPROTECTIVE VENTILATION
Ultraprotective ventilation with tidal volume reduction down to 4 mL/kg further adjusted to keep plateau pressure below 30 cm H2O and pH above 7.20
Ultraprotective ventilation with tidal volume reduction down to 4 mL/kg further adjusted to keep plateau pressure below 30 cm H2O and pH above 7.20, and PEEP set using the PEEP FiO2 table of the ARMA trial

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
A composite score based on all-cause mortality and the number of ventilator free-days (VFD)
Time Frame: Day 90
For an alive patient at day 90, the score will be built as follow: a value +1 will be given for comparisons to dead patients and alive patients with a lower number of VFD. For comparisons to alive patients with a higher number of VFD a value -1 will be given and in case of identical number of VFD a value 0 will be given. For a dead patient a value -1 will be given for comparisons to alive patients and 0 for comparisons to dead patients. For a given patients the score will correspond to the sum of values resulting to the comparison to all patients of the other group. A higher score indicates a more favorable result.
Day 90

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality (intention to treat)
Time Frame: 90-day after inclusion
All-cause mortality with analysis in intention to treat, i.e. each patient will be analyzed in his initial randomization group regardless of whether the allocated strategy was effectively applied or not.
90-day after inclusion
Ventilator-free days (VFD)
Time Frame: day 60 after inclusion

VFD will be computed as follows from the day of inclusion:

VFD= 0 if the patient dies between inclusion and day 60 VFD = 60-x if the patient is successfully weaned from invasive mechanical ventilation x days after inclusion. Successful weaning from mechanical ventilation is defined by extubation without reintubation within at least 48 hours (or weaning from mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in patients with tracheostomy) VFD= 0 if the patient is mechanically ventilated for more than 60 days after inclusion

day 60 after inclusion
All-cause mortality with per protocol analysis
Time Frame: 90-day

Per protocol analysis will be carried out by comparing the group of patients in whom median daily tidal volume from inclusion to weaning of deep sedation will be lower of equal to 4.2 ml/kg of predicted body weight to the group of patients in whom median tidal volume from inclusion to weaning of deep sedation will be greater than 4.2 ml/kg of predicted body weight, whatever the patients' initial randomization group.

Weaning of deep sedation is defined by a Richmond Agitation Sedation (RASS) score greater than -3 for at least 48 hours.

90-day
Time to successful extubation
Time Frame: 60 days
Successful extubation is defined by extubation without reintubation within at least 48 hours (or weaning from mechanical ventilation for at least 48 hours in patients with tracheostomy) Data will be right censored at 60 days and death will be taken into account as a competing risk.
60 days
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 90 days
Data will be right censored at 90 days and death will be taken into account as a competing risk.
90 days
Respiratory parameters assessed daily from inclusion to weaning of deep sedation or 14 days whichever comes first
Time Frame: 14 days
Weaning of deep sedation is defined by a Richmond Agitation Sedation (RASS) score greater than -3 for at least 48 hours.
14 days
Daily sedation dose during the first 14 days of the study
Time Frame: 14 days
Doses of the following drugs used for deep sedation will be assessed daily: midazolam, propofol and opioid. Opioid dose will be expressed as morphine equivalent with the following conversion factor: 1µg of sufentanil = 10 µg of fentanyl = 1 mg of morphine
14 days
Rate of use of rescue therapies
Time Frame: 14 days
Rescue therapies are any therapy among the following ones: neuromuscular blocking agents, prone position, nitric oxide, recruitment maneuvers, ECMO
14 days
Incidence density rate of severe mixed acidosis
Time Frame: ICU stay
Severe mixed acidosis is defined by the association of pH<7.15 and PaCO2>45 mm Hg.
ICU stay
Incidence density rate of ventilator associated pneumonia
Time Frame: ICU stay
Ventilator associated pneumonia will be defined as any pneumonia acquired under mechanical ventilation after inclusion.
ICU stay
Incidence density rate of acute cor pulmonale
Time Frame: ICU stay
Acute cor pulmonale is defined by the association of right ventricle dilatation (right ventricle surface / left ventricle surface >0,6) and septal dyskinesia assessed by echocardiography
ICU stay
Incidence density rate of barotrauma
Time Frame: ICU stay
Barotrauma is defined by any pneumothorax OR pneumomediastinum OR subcutaneous emphysema, OR pneumatocele of more than 2 cm detected on image examinations.
ICU stay
Incidence density rate of any serious adverse events
Time Frame: ICU stay
Serious adverse event is any life threatening event OR any event resulting in death.
ICU stay
Cognitive impairment assessed by phone call using the Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment (T-MoCA) test
Time Frame: Day 365 after inclusion
The Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment score will be assessed by phone call. The total score ranges from 0 to 30; higher scores being associated to a better outcome.
Day 365 after inclusion
Quality of life assessed by the RAND 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) score
Time Frame: Day 365 after inclusion
The RAND 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36) score will be assessed by phone call. The score ranges from 0 to 100; higher scores being associated to a better outcome.
Day 365 after inclusion
Post-traumatic stress disorder assessed by the Impact of Event Scale - revised (IES-R) score by phone call
Time Frame: Day 365 after inclusion
The Impact of Event Scale - revised (IES-R) score will be assessed by phone call. The total score ranges from 0 to 88; higher scores being associated to a worse outcome.
Day 365 after inclusion
Cost-efficacy ratio of the innovative strategy compared to the reference strategy
Time Frame: Day 90 after inclusion
The cost-efficacy ratio will be computed as the ratio of cost difference on efficacy difference between the intervention arm and the reference arm. The costs taken into account will be the direct hospitalized costs. The efficacy will be assessed as the number of days alive free from mechanical ventilation.
Day 90 after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 15, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 8, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

April 16, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pneumonia

Clinical Trials on PROTECTIVE VENTILATION

Subscribe