- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05708365
Generating Evidence in ECMO Ventilation Strategies (GENIE-Vent)
Generating Evidence in ECMO Ventilation Strategies - A Pilot Study
The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to test if ICU level ventilator protocols are appropriate interventions to study differences in ventilator strategies for patients with acute respiratory failure supported by VV-ECMO. The main questions it aims to answer are:
- will clinicians closely follow different ICU ventilator protocols
- will different ICU ventilator protocols change the way that patients are treated.
Participants will be assigned to one of two ventilator protocols based on the month that they are first started on ECMO. Researchers will compare standard lung-protective ventilation to ultra-lung protective ventilation protocols to see how this changes how the ventilator is set for patients.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This is a pilot, open label, pragmatic cluster-crossover clinical trial testing the feasibility and exploring the clinical impact of ICU-level ventilator management protocols as interventions in patients with acute respiratory failure requiring support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The overall objective is to inform the design of a future pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial. The investigators will do this by completion of the following aims:
Aim 1: Measure clinician fidelity to ICU-level ventilator management protocols for patients with ARDS treated with ECMO. Hypothesis: Clinicians will have high fidelity to ICU-level ventilator management protocols for patients with severe ARDS on ECMO. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct a pilot cluster-crossover study. The Duke medical ICU will be treated as a single cluster of patients. This cluster will be assigned to a standard lung-protective ventilation protocol for patients treated with ECMO, and then crossover to an ultra-lung protective ventilation protocol. The investigators will record if patient ventilator settings adhere to the assigned protocol at the time of treatment. The proportion of patients whose ventilator settings adhere to the assigned protocol will be compared to an a priori defined threshold to indicate feasibility.
Aim 2: Explore the clinical impact of using different ventilator management protocols for patients with ARDS treated with ECMO. Hypothesis: Patients managed with standard lung protective ventilation will have shorter durations of ECMO and mechanical ventilation when compared with patients managed with ultra-lung protective ventilation. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will measure the duration of ECMO and mechanical ventilation for all patients enrolled in the study. The investigators will perform an exploratory analysis examining differences in these outcomes between the two treatment groups.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Elias H Pratt, MD
- Phone Number: 9192593214
- Email: elias.pratt@duke.edu
Study Locations
-
-
North Carolina
-
Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
- Recruiting
- Duke University Medical Center
-
Contact:
- Elias H Pratt, MD
- Email: elias.pratt@duke.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients being treated with ECMO in the Duke University Hospital Medical ICU will be eligible
Exclusion Criteria:
- There are no exclusion criteria
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: Standard-Lung Protective Ventilation
|
ICU ventilator protocol adhering to the following lung protective ventilation strategy:
|
Active Comparator: Ultra-Lung Protective Ventilation
|
ICU ventilator protocol adhering to the following lung protective ventilation strategy:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Protocol fidelity rate
Time Frame: From study enrollment until removal of ECMO support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Percentage of days that a patient's ventilator settings adhere to assigned protocol
|
From study enrollment until removal of ECMO support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Duration of ECMO
Time Frame: From study enrollment until removal of ECMO support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Total number of days a patient is supported with ECMO
|
From study enrollment until removal of ECMO support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: From study enrollment until removal of mechanical ventilatory support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Total number of days a patient is supported with mechanical ventilation
|
From study enrollment until removal of mechanical ventilatory support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Duration of ICU admission
Time Frame: From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Total number of days a patient is cared for in the ICU
|
From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Duration of Hospital admission
Time Frame: From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Total number of days patient is admitted to the hospital
|
From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Survival to discharge
Time Frame: From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Whether a patient survives until hospital discharge
|
From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Time to meeting criteria for ECMO weaning
Time Frame: From study enrollment until meeting weaning criteria or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Total number of days between enrollment and when a patient meets criteria for ECMO weaning
|
From study enrollment until meeting weaning criteria or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Time to first ECMO weaning trial
Time Frame: From study enrollment until first weaning trial or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Total number of days between enrollment and when a patient first has an ECMO weaning trial
|
From study enrollment until first weaning trial or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christopher E. Cox, MD, Duke University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Pro00110840
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on ARDS
-
National University Health System, SingaporeActive, not recruiting
-
King Abdul Aziz Specialist HospitalCompleted
-
Southeast University, ChinaCompleted
-
Magni FedericoUnknown
-
Wolfson Medical CenterUnknown
-
Southeast University, ChinaFirst Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical CollegeRecruiting
-
University Hospital, AngersCompleted
Clinical Trials on Ultra-Lung Protective Ventilation
-
National University Health System, SingaporeBaxter Healthcare CorporationTerminatedRespiratory Distress Syndrome, AdultSingapore
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityTerminatedAcute Respiratory Distress Syndrome | Acute Lung Injury | Mechanical VentilationUnited States
-
Fujian Medical University Union HospitalThe First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University; The First Hospital of...RecruitingAtelectasis | Postoperative Pulmonary Complications | Ventilator-associated Lung InjuryChina
-
Seoul National University HospitalCompletedPulmonary ComplicationKorea, Republic of
-
Colin GrissomActive, not recruitingStroke | Traumatic Brain Injury | Acute Brain Injury | Intracerebral Hemorrhage | Cerebral Edema | Anoxic Brain InjuryUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineCompletedARDS | Mechanical Ventilation | Ventilator-associated ConditionsUnited States
-
University of RegensburgCharite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedAcute Respiratory Distress SyndromeGermany
-
Tianjin Medical University General HospitalCompleted
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of California, San Francisco and other collaboratorsTerminatedBrain Death | Organ Donation | Organ Transplant Failure or RejectionUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalDr. Negrin University HospitalCompletedAcute Respiratory FailureSpain, China