Generating Evidence in ECMO Ventilation Strategies (GENIE-Vent)

September 11, 2023 updated by: Duke University

Generating Evidence in ECMO Ventilation Strategies - A Pilot Study

The goal of this pilot clinical trial is to test if ICU level ventilator protocols are appropriate interventions to study differences in ventilator strategies for patients with acute respiratory failure supported by VV-ECMO. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • will clinicians closely follow different ICU ventilator protocols
  • will different ICU ventilator protocols change the way that patients are treated.

Participants will be assigned to one of two ventilator protocols based on the month that they are first started on ECMO. Researchers will compare standard lung-protective ventilation to ultra-lung protective ventilation protocols to see how this changes how the ventilator is set for patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a pilot, open label, pragmatic cluster-crossover clinical trial testing the feasibility and exploring the clinical impact of ICU-level ventilator management protocols as interventions in patients with acute respiratory failure requiring support with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). The overall objective is to inform the design of a future pragmatic, cluster-randomized clinical trial. The investigators will do this by completion of the following aims:

Aim 1: Measure clinician fidelity to ICU-level ventilator management protocols for patients with ARDS treated with ECMO. Hypothesis: Clinicians will have high fidelity to ICU-level ventilator management protocols for patients with severe ARDS on ECMO. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will conduct a pilot cluster-crossover study. The Duke medical ICU will be treated as a single cluster of patients. This cluster will be assigned to a standard lung-protective ventilation protocol for patients treated with ECMO, and then crossover to an ultra-lung protective ventilation protocol. The investigators will record if patient ventilator settings adhere to the assigned protocol at the time of treatment. The proportion of patients whose ventilator settings adhere to the assigned protocol will be compared to an a priori defined threshold to indicate feasibility.

Aim 2: Explore the clinical impact of using different ventilator management protocols for patients with ARDS treated with ECMO. Hypothesis: Patients managed with standard lung protective ventilation will have shorter durations of ECMO and mechanical ventilation when compared with patients managed with ultra-lung protective ventilation. To test this hypothesis, the investigators will measure the duration of ECMO and mechanical ventilation for all patients enrolled in the study. The investigators will perform an exploratory analysis examining differences in these outcomes between the two treatment groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All patients being treated with ECMO in the Duke University Hospital Medical ICU will be eligible

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There are no exclusion criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard-Lung Protective Ventilation

ICU ventilator protocol adhering to the following lung protective ventilation strategy:

  • Plateau Pressure ≤ 30 cm of water
  • PEEP and FiO2 set according to ARDSnet table
  • Driving Pressure ≤ 15 cm of water
  • Respiratory rate between 8 and 30 breaths per minute
Active Comparator: Ultra-Lung Protective Ventilation

ICU ventilator protocol adhering to the following lung protective ventilation strategy:

  • Plateau Pressure ≤ 30 cm of water
  • PEEP and FiO2 set according to ARDSnet table
  • Driving Pressure ≤ 15 cm of water
  • Respiratory rate between 8 and 30 breaths per minute

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Protocol fidelity rate
Time Frame: From study enrollment until removal of ECMO support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Percentage of days that a patient's ventilator settings adhere to assigned protocol
From study enrollment until removal of ECMO support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Duration of ECMO
Time Frame: From study enrollment until removal of ECMO support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Total number of days a patient is supported with ECMO
From study enrollment until removal of ECMO support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Duration of mechanical ventilation
Time Frame: From study enrollment until removal of mechanical ventilatory support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Total number of days a patient is supported with mechanical ventilation
From study enrollment until removal of mechanical ventilatory support or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Duration of ICU admission
Time Frame: From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Total number of days a patient is cared for in the ICU
From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Duration of Hospital admission
Time Frame: From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Total number of days patient is admitted to the hospital
From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Survival to discharge
Time Frame: From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Whether a patient survives until hospital discharge
From study enrollment until hospital discharge or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Time to meeting criteria for ECMO weaning
Time Frame: From study enrollment until meeting weaning criteria or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Total number of days between enrollment and when a patient meets criteria for ECMO weaning
From study enrollment until meeting weaning criteria or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Time to first ECMO weaning trial
Time Frame: From study enrollment until first weaning trial or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks
Total number of days between enrollment and when a patient first has an ECMO weaning trial
From study enrollment until first weaning trial or death, whichever comes first, up to 52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Christopher E. Cox, MD, Duke University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 13, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 13, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 11, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on ARDS

Clinical Trials on Ultra-Lung Protective Ventilation

3
Subscribe