Effects of Temporomandibular Disorder on Masticatory Efficiency

May 6, 2020 updated by: Ezgi Yüceer Çetiner, Bahçeşehir University

Masticatory Efficiency Before and After Muscle-Related Temporomandibular Disorder Treatment

Temporomandibular disorders (TMD) are defined by pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and related tissues, limitations in the movements of the lower jaw, and TMJ noises.1,2 TMD are classified into four groups as temporomandibular joint disorders, masticatory muscle disorders, headache attributed to TMD and associated structures.3,4 Of these, masticatory muscle disorders are the most common TMD subtype seen in dental clinics.5-7 In general, two major symptoms are seen associated with masticatory muscle disorders: Pain and dysfunction. Pain is the vast majority of complaints about masticatory muscle disorders. The other important complaint is dysfunction, which occurs as a limitation in the opening range of the mandible.8 It is known that individuals with experimental muscle pain are slower than healthy individuals when biting hard food and show lower maximum voluntary clenching capacity.9 Also, it has been reported that the maximum bite force decreased in patients with temporomandibular disorders.10 These consequences directly affect patients' quality of life. Therefore, rehabilitation of limited masticatory functions is one of the important therapeutic goals for TMD patients.11 In TMD patients, masticatory functions can be measured objectively with bite force, bite force endurance, electromyography, and jaw kinematics, etc. Another objective method that can be used to determine masticatory functions is the masticatory efficiency test. In the literature, there are few studies that measure masticatory efficiency in TMD patients.12-16 Only two of these studies investigated the effect of TMD treatment and used the sieve method to measure masticatory efficiency.15,16 Although the sieve method is considered the gold standard, the procedure is complex and time consuming.17,18 To eliminate these disadvantages, masticatory efficiency measurement with two-color chewing gum tests which are simple and do not require special equipment or training can be used. The effect of many different conditions and treatments on masticatory efficiency was evaluated with this method.19 However, to our knowledge, there is no study in the literature evaluating TMD treatment with this method.

The aim of this study was to compare the masticatory efficiency with a two-color chewing gum test before and after treatment of the masticatory muscle-related temporomandibular disorder.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

42

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • In The USA Or Canada, Please Select...
      • Istanbul, In The USA Or Canada, Please Select..., Turkey, 34734
        • Ezgi Yüceer Çetiner

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

21 patients who were referred to the Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics with a complaint of pain in the chewing muscles were enrolled in this study. The control group was selected from among the employees and students of the faculty of dentistry to represent the general population without any temporomandibular disorder (TMD).

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Presence of muscle-related temporomandibular disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients under the age of 18, who had a missing tooth (except 3rd molars) or crown-bridge restorations, any intra-articular temporomandibular disorder were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Employees and students
The control group was selected from among the employees and students of the faculty of dentistry to represent the general population without any temporomandibular disorder (TMD).

Two-color chewing gum mixing ability test was used to measure masticatory efficiency in the control group, before and after treatment in the experimental group.21 Commercial two-color chewing gum was used.The gum was left on the patient's tongue and he/she was asked to chew 20 times naturally.

After chewing, the gum was put in a transparent plastic bag and squeezed to 1 mm. Both sides of the sample were scanned at 300 dpi resolution on a desktop scanner (HP Deskjet, California, USA) in the same day to prevent the colors from deteriorating due to saliva. For each patient, two sides of scanned images were processed in ViewGum software (version 1.4, Dhal Software, Kifissia, Greece, www.dhal.com) using the method of Halozenitis et al. (2013).22 The value of VOH (variance of hue) was taken as the value of chewing activity. The highness of this value indicates low masticatory efficiency.

Patients
Patients who were referred to the Ondokuz Mayıs University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics with a complaint of pain in the chewing muscles were enrolled in this study.

Two-color chewing gum mixing ability test was used to measure masticatory efficiency in the control group, before and after treatment in the experimental group.21 Commercial two-color chewing gum was used.The gum was left on the patient's tongue and he/she was asked to chew 20 times naturally.

After chewing, the gum was put in a transparent plastic bag and squeezed to 1 mm. Both sides of the sample were scanned at 300 dpi resolution on a desktop scanner (HP Deskjet, California, USA) in the same day to prevent the colors from deteriorating due to saliva. For each patient, two sides of scanned images were processed in ViewGum software (version 1.4, Dhal Software, Kifissia, Greece, www.dhal.com) using the method of Halozenitis et al. (2013).22 The value of VOH (variance of hue) was taken as the value of chewing activity. The highness of this value indicates low masticatory efficiency.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
masticatory efficiency
Time Frame: 6 weeks
Two-color chewing gum mixing ability test was used to measure masticatory efficiency in the control group and experimental group
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 3, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 10, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 7, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2020

Last Verified

May 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Disorder

Clinical Trials on Masticatory efficiency

3
Subscribe