- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04406298
Safety and Efficacy of Small Frequent Paracentesis Using an Indwelling CAtheter Compared With Repeated Large Volume Paracentesis in Cirrhotic Patients With REfractory Ascites
Safety and Efficacy of Small Frequent Paracentesis Using an Indwelling CAtheter Compared With Repeated Large Volume Paracentesis in Cirrhotic Patients With REfractory Ascites- A Randomized Controlled Trial (I-CARE)
The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of intermittent small quantity (upto 3L per day) paracentesis through an indwelling catheter for up to 5 days in comparison with large volume paracentesis on decreasing the need for repeated paracentesis by 50 % over next 3 months. The project will be conducted at ILBS between April 2020 and March 2021. The concept of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of indwelling catheter in reducing the refilling rates of ascites by 50 % over 3 months in comparison to LVPs and also in reducing the incidence and risk of PPCD. All refractory ascites patients will be included as per inclusion and exclusion criteria, after taking informed consent from the patient or their relatives.
The expected outcomes are
Primary outcome: Proportion of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites achieving at least 50 % reduction on need for large volume paracentesis after a short duration (5day) intermittent small quantity (up to 3L/ day) paracentesis through an indwelling catheter in comparison to a single large volume paracentesis in the next 3 months.
Secondary outcome:
1. Proportion of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites developing P 2 . During a 30 D, 60 D and 90 D follow up, to assess between the groups
- Need for repeated paracentesis : Number assessed
- AKI : Improvement or worsening of renal functions
- Hepatic encephalopathy: Grading as per West Haven Classification
- Hyponatremia
- Diuretic tolerability : Dose and duration tolerated
- Bacterial peritonitis : Ascitic fluid neutrophil count > 250 cells/cumm
- Transplant free survival
- Risk of procedure related complications
- Changes in MELD or CTP between the groups ( Improvement vs worsening )
- Need for hospitalization between the groups
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Delhi
-
New Delhi, Delhi, India, 110070
- Recruiting
- Institute of Liver & Biliary Sciences
-
Contact:
- Dr Manasa Alla, MD
- Phone Number: 01146300000
- Email: manasa1512@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Cirrhotic patients 18-70 yrs with refractory severe ascites with stable renal function (S.creatinine < 2 mg/dl).
Exclusion Criteria:
- CTP >12, MELD>25
- Prior or current Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis (SBP)
- Recurrent or current overt hepatic encephalopathy
- Serum Creatinine >2
- HVOTO (Hepatic Venous Outflow Tract Obstruction)
- Hepatic or extrahepatic malignancy
- Recent UGI bleed
- Sepsis
- Serum Sodium < 120
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Small Quantity Paracentesis
Intermittent small quantity (upto 3L per day) paracentesis through an indwelling catheter for up to 5 days.
|
Intermittent small quantity paracentesis (upto 3L/day) for upto 5 days
|
Active Comparator: Large Volume Paracentesis
Large Volume Paracentesis > 5 litres
|
Large Volume Paracentesis > 5litres
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Proportion of cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites achieving at least 50 % reduction on need for large volume paracentesis in both groups
Time Frame: 3 Months
|
3 Months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Number of participants which requires repeated paracentesis in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Number of participants which requires repeated paracentesis in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Number of participants which requires for repeated paracentesis in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
|
Number of participants with AKI : Improvement or worsening of renal functions in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Number of participants with AKI : Improvement or worsening of renal functions in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Number of participants with AKI : Improvement or worsening of renal functions in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
|
Number of participants with Hepatic Encephalopathy in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Grading of Hepatic Encephalopathy will be as per West Haven Classification (Score 1 to 4) in both groups
|
30 days
|
Number of participants with Hepatic Encephalopathy in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Grading of Hepatic Encephalopathy will be as per West Haven Classification (Score 1 to 4) in both groups
|
60 days
|
Number of participants with Hepatic Encephalopathy in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Grading of Hepatic Encephalopathy will be as per West Haven Classification (Score 1 to 4) in both groups
|
90 days
|
Number of participants with Hyponatremia in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Number of participants with Hyponatremia in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Number of participants with Hyponatremia in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
|
Diuretic tolerability : Dose tolerated in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Diuretic tolerability : Dose tolerated in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Diuretic tolerability : Dose tolerated in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
|
Diuretic tolerability : Duration tolerated in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Diuretic tolerability : Duration tolerated in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Diuretic tolerability : Duration tolerated in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
|
Bacterial peritonitis : Ascitic fluid neutrophil count > 250 cells/cumm in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Bacterial peritonitis : Ascitic fluid neutrophil count > 250 cells/cumm in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Bacterial peritonitis : Ascitic fluid neutrophil count > 250 cells/cumm in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
|
Transplant free survival in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Transplant free survival in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Transplant free survival in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
|
Number of participants develop adverse events associated with procedure in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Number of participants develop adverse events associated with procedure in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Number of participants develop adverse events associated with procedure in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
|
Change in Model for End Stage Liver Disease Score in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
MELD Score ranges from 6 to 40
|
30 days
|
Change in Model for End Stage Liver Disease Score in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
MELD Score ranges from 6 to 40
|
60 days
|
Change in Model for End Stage Liver Disease Score in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
MELD Score ranges from 6 to 40
|
90 days
|
Change in CTP (Child-Turcotte-Pugh) Score in both groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Child class A: < 7 points.
Child class B: 7-9 points.
Child class C: ≥10 points
|
30 days
|
Change in CTP (Child-Turcotte-Pugh) Score in both groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
Child class A: < 7 points.
Child class B: 7-9 points.
Child class C: ≥10 points
|
60 days
|
Change in CTP (Child-Turcotte-Pugh) Score in both groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
Child class A: < 7 points.
Child class B: 7-9 points.
Child class C: ≥10 points
|
90 days
|
Number of patients required hospitalization between the groups
Time Frame: 30 days
|
30 days
|
|
Number of patients required hospitalization between the groups
Time Frame: 60 days
|
60 days
|
|
Number of patients required hospitalization between the groups
Time Frame: 90 days
|
90 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- ILBS-Cirrhosis-29
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Liver Cirrhosis
-
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and...Society for the Study of Liver Diseases, Chandigarh ( India )UnknownDecompensated Cirrhosis of LiverIndia
-
The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical...RecruitingFibrosis, Liver | Cirrhosis, LiverChina
-
SUUMC Central Military Hospital Dr Carol DavilaRecruiting
-
The Cleveland ClinicRecruiting
-
The Cleveland ClinicRecruitingCirrhosis, LiverUnited States
-
University of PittsburghNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)CompletedCirrhosis, LiverUnited States
-
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical CenterAmerican Association for the Study of Liver Diseases FoundationCompleted
-
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, IndiaCompletedCirrhosis, LiverIndia
-
Sherief Abd-ElsalamUnknown
Clinical Trials on small quantity paracentesis
-
Alliance for International Medical ActionInstitut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France; Programme... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
-
International Food Policy Research InstituteHelen Keller InternationalCompleted
-
Inter-American Development BankHospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez; The PepsiCo FoundationWithdrawnObesity, Childhood | Stunting | Feeding Patterns | Exclusive BreastfeedingMexico
-
Charite University, Berlin, GermanyCompletedOvarian Cancer | Hemodynamic Instability | Malignant AscitesGermany
-
Abramson Cancer Center of the University of PennsylvaniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Completed
-
Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and...TerminatedAscites | Peritoneal Carcinomatosis | Peritoneum Neoplasm | Tuberculous PeritonitisIndia
-
McMaster UniversityDairy Farmers of Canada; National Dairy CouncilRecruiting
-
Universitätsmedizin MannheimCompletedLiver Cirrhosis | Tense Ascites