The MITRAL II Pivotal Trial (Mitral Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLves). (MITRAL-II)

January 12, 2026 updated by: Mayra Guerrero

The Safety and Effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN 3, SAPIEN 3 Ultra, and SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA (SAPIEN 3/Ultra/RESILIA) Valve in Patients With Symptomatic Severe Calcific Mitral Valve Disease With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification Who Are Not Candidates for Standard Mitral Valve Surgery.

A prospective multicenter study enrolling high surgical risk patients with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) and symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction (severe stenosis, ≥ moderate to severe regurgitation, or mixed ≥ moderate stenosis and ≥ regurgitation). There are 2 Arms in this study: 1) "Transseptal (TS) Valve-in-MAC" (ViMAC) Arm, and 2) Natural History of Disease Registry (NHDR) for patients treated with medical treatment only (which includes patients who meet inclusion criteria but can't be treated with transeptal ViMAC due to the presence of anatomical exclusion criteria or other exclusion criteria) and have not had other procedures that may impact outcomes (i.e., alcohol septal ablation or radiofrequency ablation). The study also includes a Registry of Permanently Unassigned" for subjects who undergo preemptive septal ablation procedures (alcohol or radiofrequency) in anticipation of continuing onto ViMAC arm, but are not accepted in the ViMAC Study arm or the patient chooses not to undergo ViMAC procedure.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of the Edwards SAPIEN 3, SAPIEN 3 Ultra and SAPIEN 3 Ultra RESILIA (SAPIEN 3/Ultra/RESILIA) valves with Commander delivery system in patients with severe mitral annular calcification and symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction who are not candidates for standard mitral valve surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective multicenter study enrolling high surgical risk patients with severe mitral annular calcification (MAC) and symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction (severe stenosis, ≥ moderate to severe regurgitation, or mixed ≥ moderate stenosis and ≥ regurgitation). There are 2 arms in this study: 1) "Transseptal (TS) Valve-in-MAC (ViMAC)" arm, 2) Natural History of Disease Registry (NHDR). Patients treated with medical treatment only (which will include patients who meet inclusion criteria but can't be treated with transseptal ViMAC due to the presence of anatomical exclusion criteria or other exclusion criteria) and have not had other procedures that may impact outcomes (i.e. alcohol septal ablation, radiofrequency ablation).

Enrollment Enrollment will consist of 110 patients in the treatment arm (transseptal ViMAC) and up to 100 in the medically treated arm).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

210

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Mexico City, Mexico, 14080
    • Arizona
      • Gilbert, Arizona, United States, 85297
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85006
        • Recruiting
        • Banner - University Medicine Cardiology Clinic
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Philip Gideon, MD
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
        • Recruiting
        • Pima Heart & Vascular
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Thomas E Waggoner, DO
        • Contact:
    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90048
        • Recruiting
        • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Raj Makkar, MD
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94109
        • Recruiting
        • Sutter Health
        • Principal Investigator:
          • David Daniels, MD
        • Contact:
    • Colorado
      • Fort Collins, Colorado, United States, 80528
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Uchealth Heart & Vascular Clinic Harmony Campus
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States, 200100
        • Recruiting
        • Medstar Washington Hospital Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Lowell Satler, MD
        • Contact:
    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Recruiting
        • Brigham and Women's Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Pinak Shah, MD
        • Contact:
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02114
        • Recruiting
        • Massachusetts General Hospital
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ignacio Inglessis, MD
        • Contact:
    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Active, not recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
    • Oklahoma
      • Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States, 74104
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • Oregon Health & Science University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Firars Zahr, MD
        • Contact:
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
    • Utah
      • Murray, Utah, United States, 84107
        • Recruiting
        • Intermountain Medical Center
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Brian Whisenant, MD
    • Virginia
      • Norfolk, Virginia, United States, 23507
        • Active, not recruiting
        • The Sentara Heart Valve and Structural Disease Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All Candidates must meet the following criteria:

  1. - 18 years of age or older
  2. -Severe mitral annular calcification with symptomatic mitral valve dysfunction including severe mitral stenosis defined as mitral valve area (MVA) of ≤1.5 cm2, or ≥ moderate to severe mitral regurgitation, or mixed ≥ moderated stenosis and ≥ moderate regurgitation. For this study, the severity of mitral regurgitation will be graded according to the 2017 American Society of Echocardiography Guidelines: None, Trivial, Mild 1(+), Moderate 2(+), Moderate to severe 3(+), and severe 4(+).
  3. - NYHA Functional Class ≥II.
  4. The heart team agrees that valve implantation will likely benefit the patient.
  5. High or prohibitive risk for standard mitral valve surgery as determined by the heart team (at least one site cardiac surgeon must personally examine the subject to determine operative risk in patients presented for inclusion to ViMAC arm). NOTE: Patients not interested in mitral intervention or who are being considered for inclusion in the Natural History of Disease Registry are not required to be evaluated in person by a surgeon.)
  6. The study patient has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
  7. The study patient agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits including annual visits through 5 years.

Exclusion Criteria for ViMAC subjects (does not apply to the Natural History of Disease Registry):

  1. - The heart team considers the patient is a surgical candidate.
  2. - Mitral annulus is not severely calcified.
  3. - Myocardial infarction requiring revascularization within 30 days from procedure.
  4. - Clinically significant untreated coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
  5. Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease). Implantation of a permanent pacemaker is not exclusionary.
  6. Any patient with a balloon valvuloplasty (BMV) within 30 days of the procedure (unless BMV is a bridge to ViMAC procedure after a qualifying Echo).
  7. Severe symptomatic tricuspid regurgitation (hepatic dysfunction, ascites, edema not controlled with diuretics) requiring surgery.
  8. Leukopenia (WBC < 3000 cell/mL), acute anemia (Hgb < 9 g/dL), Thrombocytopenia (Platelets < 50,000 cell/mL), history of coagulopathy or hypercoagulable state.
  9. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) with mean LVOT gradient of ≥20 mm Hg at rest or ≥50 mmHg with Valsalva.
  10. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of screening evaluation.
  11. Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  12. Severe left ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 20%.
  13. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  14. Active upper GI bleeding within 90 days prior to procedure.
  15. A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be anticoagulated for the study procedure.
  16. Cardiac anatomy that would preclude appropriate delivery and deployment of an Edwards SAPIEN 3/Ultra/RESILIA valve in MAC via transseptal access, including but not limited to:

    • Native neo mitral annulus size < 275 mm2 or > 810 mm2 as measured by CT scan.
    • Significant risk of LVOT obstruction or valve embolization as assessed by CT core lab
  17. Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days of the procedure.
  18. Estimated life expectancy <12 months due to non-cardiac conditions.
  19. Expectation that patient will not improve despite treatment of mitral valve dysfunction.
  20. Active bacterial endocarditis within 180 days of procedure.
  21. - Severe right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by Echo core lab
  22. - Active infection requiring antibiotic therapy (subject may be a candidate after 2 weeks of antibiotic discontinuation.
  23. - Female who is pregnant or lactating.
  24. - Participating in another investigational device study.
  25. - Aortic valve disease requiring intervention. If aortic valve intervention is required, the AVR procedure should be performed first and if the patient remains symptomatic after AVR, may be presented for consideration for inclusion in this trial.
  26. - Severe fixed pulmonary hypertension (PASP ≥70 mmHg and more than 2/3 of the systemic systolic blood pressure).
  27. - Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease requiring continuous home oxygen.
  28. - The patient refuses mitral valve intervention
  29. - Recent symptomatic COVID-19 infection with residual symptoms that may affect the outcomes of this trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Transseptal ViMAC
110 MAC patients treated with transseptal Valve-in-MAC.
Transseptal TMVR using balloon-expandable aortic transcatheter valves.
Other Names:
  • ViMAC
No Intervention: Registry of untreated patients
100 MAC patients not eligible for transseptal ViMAC, treated with conservative management including medications.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Primary Safety Endpoint: All Cause Morality and Hospitalization for Heart Failure
Time Frame: 1 year.
A non-hierarchical composite of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure.
1 year.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: 1 year
• Stroke at 30 days and 1 year.
1 year
Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: 1 year.
• Change from baseline in New York Heart Association Class at 1 year.
1 year.
Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: 1 year.
• Change from baseline in distance walked measure by the 6 Minute Walk Test at 1 year.
1 year.
Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: 1 year.
• Echocardiographic assessment of degree of mitral regurgitation (central and paravalvular) at 1 year.
1 year.
Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: 1 year.
• Significant mitral stenosis defined as mean mitral valve gradient by echo > 10 mmHg at 1 year.
1 year.
Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint
Time Frame: 1 year.
• Change from baseline in quality-of-life measure by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) at 1 year.
1 year.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Additional Endpoint: Technical Success
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention procedure.

• Technical success at exit from the cath lab.

Defined as:

  • Successful vascular access, delivery and retrieval of the transcatheter valve delivery system.
  • Deployment of a single valve.
  • Correct position of transcatheter valve in the mitral annulus.
  • Adequate performance of the prosthetic heart valve (MVA > 1.5 cm2) without residual mitral regurgitation grade ≥2 (+).
  • No need for additional surgery or re-intervention (includes drainage of pericardial effusion).
  • The patient leaves the cath lab alive.
Immediately after the intervention procedure.
Additional Endpoint: Procedural Success
Time Frame: 30 days

• Procedural Success at 30 days.

Defined as:

  • Device success at 30 days.
  • No device/procedure related SAE's including: death, stroke, MI or coronary ischemia requiring PCI or CABG, stage 2 or 3 AKI including dialysis, life threatening bleeding, major vascular or access complications (arterial, venous, or TA - any event requiring additional unplanned surgical or transcatheter intervention), pericardial effusion or tamponade requiring drainage, severe hypotension, heart failure or respiratory failure requiring intravenous pressors or invasive or mechanical treatments such as ultrafiltration or hemodynamic assist devices including intra-aortic balloon pump or left ventricular assist device, or prolonged intubation for ≥48 hrs, or any valve-related dysfunction, migration, thrombosis, or other complication requiring surgery or repeat intervention.
30 days
Additional Endpoint: Device Success
Time Frame: 30 days.

Device success is defined as:

  • Stroke free survival with original valve in place.
  • No need for additional surgery or re-intervention related to the procedure, access or to the replacement valve.
  • Proper placement and intended function of the replacement valve, including
  • No migration, fracture, thrombosis, hemolysis or endocarditis.
  • No replacement valve stenosis (MV gradient < 10 mmHg).
  • Replacement valve regurgitation < 2 + (including central and paravalvular leak) and without associated hemolysis.
  • No increase in AI from baseline (more than 1 grade) and LVOT gradient < 20 mmHg increase from baseline.
30 days.
Additional Efficacy Endpoint - NYHA Class at 30 days.
Time Frame: 30 days.
• Change from baseline in NYHA Class at 30 days.
30 days.
Additional Efficacy Endpoint - Distance walked in 6 MWT at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days.
• Change from baseline in distance walked measure by the 6 MWT at 30 days.
30 days.
Additional Efficacy Endpoint - KCCQ at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days.
• Change from baseline in KCCQ at 30 days.
30 days.
Additional Efficacy Endpoint - MR severity at 30 days
Time Frame: 30 days
• Degree of mitral regurgitation (central and paravalvular) at 30 days.
30 days
Additional Safety Endpoint - Stroke at 30 days and 1 year.
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• Stroke at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Safety Endpoint - Need for ASD Closure
Time Frame: 30 days.
• Iatrogenic ASD causing RV failure or hypoxemia or need for ASD closure at discharge and 30 days.
30 days.
Additional Safety Endpoint - New LVOT Gradient
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• New mean LVOT gradient ≥ 20 mmHg, or ≥ 20 mmHg increase from baseline LVOT gradient at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Efficacy Endpoint - Mitral Valve Reintervention
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• Mitral Valve reintervention at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Safety Endpoint - Hospitalizations at 1 year
Time Frame: 1 year.
• Number of hospitalizations at 1 year.
1 year.
Additional Safety Endpoint - Hemolysis
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• Hemolysis at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Safety Endpoint - Endocarditis
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• Endocarditis at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Safety Endpoint - Blood Transfusion
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• Blood transfusion at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Safety Endpoint - New Pacemaker Requirement
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• New pacemaker requirement at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Safety Endpoint - New Aortic Valve Insufficiency
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• New aortic valve insufficiency at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Safety Endpoint - Acute Kidney Injury
Time Frame: 30 days and 1 year.
• Acute kidney injury (MVARC) at 30 days and 1 year.
30 days and 1 year.
Additional Efficacy Endpoint - Days Alive Out of the Hospital
Time Frame: 1 year.
• Days alive out of hospital at 1 year from index procedure (ViMAC arm) or from assignment day (Natural History Registry).
1 year.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mayra Guerrero, MD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 19, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on Transseptal ViMAC

Subscribe