A New Anatomical Classification of Portal Vein Location of Pancreas Tumors

May 5, 2022 updated by: Pinar Yazici, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital

A New Anatomical Classification of Portal Venous Involvement in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer to Predict the Surgical Difficulty

In this retrospective study, we recorded the location of pancreatic tumors and relation/proximity to the portal vein. The surgical difficulty and requirement of additional interventions were also evaluated.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Between May 2014 and October 2018, all patients who underwent PD procedure were retrospectively reviewed. This retrospective cohort study identified all consecutive patients with T3 (stage IIA to III) adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas, who underwent concomitant venous (PV/SMV) resection. Those patients with locally advanced tumors that were not responded to neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. The local ethical committee was approved this study.

Data collection included demographical features, tumor characteristics including the PV level of the tumor considering computed tomography results, neoadjuvant therapy, surgical data, hospital stay, morbidity and mortality.

Anatomical classification was established based on the relationship between portal confluence (PC) and tumor location (Figure I). Those tumors located superior to the PC were classified as Level I, whereas tumors on the confluence inferiorly located to PC were classified as Level II and Level III.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

43

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • This retrospective cohort study identified all consecutive patients with T3 (stage IIA to III) adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas, who underwent concomitant venous (PV/SMV) resection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those patients with locally advanced tumors that were not responded to neoadjuvant therapy were excluded.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Level 1
Those tumors located superior to the portal confluence were classified as Level I,
For Level I-II tumors, in case of segmental resection of PV/SMV, the reconstruction was performed by an end-to-end anastomosis either by direct suture (for defect under 2 cm) or by using an interposition venous or prosthetic graft. For this purpose, autologous grafting we used internal jugular vein and cadaveric iliac vein and alternatively, synthetic PTFE graft was also used.
For Level I-II tumors, in case of segmental resection of PV/SMV, the reconstruction was performed by an end-to-end anastomosis either by direct suture (for defect under 2 cm) or by using an interposition venous or prosthetic graft. For this purpose, autologous grafting we used internal jugular vein and cadaveric iliac vein and alternatively, synthetic PTFE graft was also used.
Other Names:
  • primary repair
Other: Level II
those tumors located on the confluence (involving the confluence) located on the portal confluence
For Level I-II tumors, in case of segmental resection of PV/SMV, the reconstruction was performed by an end-to-end anastomosis either by direct suture (for defect under 2 cm) or by using an interposition venous or prosthetic graft. For this purpose, autologous grafting we used internal jugular vein and cadaveric iliac vein and alternatively, synthetic PTFE graft was also used.
For Level I-II tumors, in case of segmental resection of PV/SMV, the reconstruction was performed by an end-to-end anastomosis either by direct suture (for defect under 2 cm) or by using an interposition venous or prosthetic graft. For this purpose, autologous grafting we used internal jugular vein and cadaveric iliac vein and alternatively, synthetic PTFE graft was also used.
Other Names:
  • primary repair
Other: Level III
those tumors located inferior to the portal confluence
For Level I-II tumors, in case of segmental resection of PV/SMV, the reconstruction was performed by an end-to-end anastomosis either by direct suture (for defect under 2 cm) or by using an interposition venous or prosthetic graft. For this purpose, autologous grafting we used internal jugular vein and cadaveric iliac vein and alternatively, synthetic PTFE graft was also used.
Other Names:
  • primary repair
Regarding Level III tumors, complete resection of the tumor was done either by tangential excision or by partial venous excision and subsequent reconstruction. To maintain a secure anastomosis, the mesenteric root was mobilized completely or/and splenic vein was divided.
Other Names:
  • segmental resection

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
peri-operative or postoperative complication
Time Frame: up to one month
surgical complications observed during both operative and postoperative period
up to one month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
hospital stay
Time Frame: up to one month
the time between the day of surgery and hospital discharge
up to one month

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
in hospital mortality
Time Frame: up to two months
any mortality after/during surgery in the initial hospital stay
up to two months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 3, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

June 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 5, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

any question about details can be shared via e-mail privately.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pancreatic Neoplasm Malignant Head Primary

Clinical Trials on primary repair

3
Subscribe