Efficacy of Fluoride Varnish Containing Xylitol Coated Calcium Phosphate Versus Conventional Fluoride Varnish in Management of Hypersensitivity of Exposed Root Surfaces in Adult Patients

January 20, 2022 updated by: Peter Edward Ibrahim Abdelmalik, Cairo University

Efficacy of Fluoride Varnish Containing Xylitol Coated Calcium Phosphate Versus Conventional Fluoride Varnish in Management of Hypersensitivity of Exposed Root Surfaces in Adult Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial

This clinical trial will be conducted to compare the efficacy of fluoride varnish containing xylitol coated calcium and phosphate or potassium nitrate gel versus conventional fluoride varnish in the management of hypersensitivity of non-carious exposed root surfaces in adult patients over a 12 months period.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

105

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Giza, Egypt, 12311
        • Cairo U

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 48 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria of participants:

Males or females. Age: 20-50 years old. Patients having at least one tooth with exposed root surface Teeth with hypersensitivity, VAS ≥5 Patients with good oral hygiene. Co-operative patients who show interest to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria of participants:

Patients with bad oral hygiene Patients with orthodontic appliances, or bridge work that might interfere with evaluation Patients who are allergic to any ingredients will be used in the study. Carious teeth Mobile teeth. (Grade 2 or Grade 3) Teeth with hypersensitivity, VAS <5 Patients with physical disabilities Pregnant or lactating women Other dental defects that causes pain. Allergy from any used materials or any allergic reaction during our clinical trial (The trial will be stopped at once and all the needed management against any allergic reaction will be done.)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Fluoride varnish with xylitol coated calcium and phosphate
Fluoride varnish with xylitol coated calcium and phosphate
Active Comparator: Conventional Fluoride varnish
Fluoride varnish with xylitol coated calcium and phosphate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain due to Dentin Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: Two minutes before intervention
Pain arising from Dentin Hypersensitivity on exposed root surfaces using air blast measured by 10 cm VAS scale
Two minutes before intervention
Pain due to Dentin Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 4 hours
Pain arising from Dentin Hypersensitivity on exposed root surfaces using air blast measured by 10 cm VAS scale
4 hours
Pain due to Dentin Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 2 days
Pain arising from Dentin Hypersensitivity on exposed root surfaces using air blast measured by 10 cm VAS scale
2 days
Pain due to Dentin Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 4 months
Pain arising from Dentin Hypersensitivity on exposed root surfaces using air blast measured by 10 cm VAS scale
4 months
Pain due to Dentin Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 8 months
Pain arising from Dentin Hypersensitivity on exposed root surfaces using air blast measured by 10 cm VAS scale
8 months
Pain due to Dentin Hypersensitivity
Time Frame: 12 months
Pain arising from Dentin Hypersensitivity on exposed root surfaces using air blast measured by 10 cm VAS scale
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measuring Salivary pH
Time Frame: Two minutes before intervention
measuring Unstimulated Salivary pH using pH meter from 0-14
Two minutes before intervention
Measuring Salivary pH
Time Frame: 4 hours
measuring Unstimulated Salivary pH using pH meter from 0-14
4 hours
Measuring Salivary pH
Time Frame: 2 days
measuring Unstimulated Salivary pH using pH meter from 0-14
2 days
Measuring Salivary pH
Time Frame: 4 months
measuring Unstimulated Salivary pH using pH meter from 0-14
4 months
Measuring Salivary pH
Time Frame: 8 months
measuring Unstimulated Salivary pH using pH meter from 0-14
8 months
Measuring Salivary pH
Time Frame: 12 months
measuring Unstimulated Salivary pH using pH meter from 0-14
12 months
Image analysis to assess amount of plaque adherence
Time Frame: 2 minutes before intervention
Calculating the percentage (0%-100%) of area with plaque adherence in relation to the total area of the tooth surface
2 minutes before intervention
Image analysis to assess amount of plaque adherence
Time Frame: 4 hours
Calculating the percentage (0%-100%) of area with plaque adherence in relation to the total area of the tooth surface
4 hours
Image analysis to assess amount of plaque adherence
Time Frame: 2 days
Calculating the percentage (0%-100%) of area with plaque adherence in relation to the total area of the tooth surface
2 days
Image analysis to assess amount of plaque adherence
Time Frame: 4 months
Calculating the percentage (0%-100%) of area with plaque adherence in relation to the total area of the tooth surface
4 months
Image analysis to assess amount of plaque adherence
Time Frame: 8 months
Calculating the percentage (0%-100%) of area with plaque adherence in relation to the total area of the tooth surface
8 months
Image analysis to assess amount of plaque adherence
Time Frame: 12 months
Calculating the percentage (0%-100%) of area with plaque adherence in relation to the total area of the tooth surface
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Peter E Abdelmalik, Master, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 20, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hypersensitivity

Clinical Trials on Fluoride varnish with xylitol coated calcium and phosphate

3
Subscribe