Quality Improvement Project - "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!"; ("Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!")

January 7, 2024 updated by: Dr. Liesa J. Weiler-Wichtl, Medical University of Vienna

A Quality Improvement Project to Implement Psychosocial Care Standards in Clinical Practice in Pediatric Oncology "My Logbook! - I Know my Way Around!" ("Mein Logbuch - Ich Kenne Mich Aus!") Development and Evaluation of a Consensus and Evidence Based Psychosocial Therapy Tool in a Preliminary Psychosocial Study on Therapy Optimization.

In this study, the main goal is to implement and evaluate a novel, evidence-based psycho-educative program for children in oncological care. Patients are provided with booklets tailored to each specific stage of their treatment. Among other factors, children's emotional well-being is evaluated as well as feasibility. The study is carried out at multiple sites across Austria, Germany and Italy/South Tirol.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is well documented that the prevalence of mental disorders in childhood cancer survivors is twice to quadruple compared to healthy controls. Effects range from impaired emotional balance, fear of recidivisms, helplessness, depression to post traumatic stress disorder.

As a basis for interventions to preventively address these issues and moreover, to achieve defined psychosocial goals in the field of paediatric oncology, guidelines and standards systematically describe stressors and resources in particularly challenging situations. Nevertheless, despite these guidelines, actual care is quite heterogenous due to differences in setting, provision and profession. Studies show that integrated models of psychosocial care yield better outcomes. Integrated care systems can enhance patient satisfaction, increase perceived quality of care, and enable access to services and reduce service costs. Highly complex, system-wide interventions such as models of integrated care represent considerable challenges for operationalisation of relevant factors and evaluation of whole processes compared to single interventions (e.g. relaxation techniques). Quality improvement (QI) is an iterative process designed to make controlled changes within the health care delivery system to provide patients with high-quality care that meets both their expectations and needs. In terms of quality assurance, this QI Project aims to operationalize recommendations of the S3 guideline for psychosocial care which results in a combined process- and patient-oriented intervention and evaluation tool - bridging the gap between standards/evidence and clinical practice.

The "Onco-Mini-Version" of "My Logbook - I know my way around" already comprises a Starter-Kit and 8 booklets, which cover at least one main issue of every treatment phase: initial contact, medical assessment (MRI), supportive therapy (chemotherapy, radio therapy), rehabilitation and after-care. All interventions are carried out by a clinical psychologist or psychosocial staff specialized in pediatric psychooncology and are understood as part of an integrated care system. Every booklet provides practical materials with enhanced stimulating elements to encourage the child to explore actively. The booklets are structured in two face-to-face sessions covering psychoeducational, activity & practice and reflective aspects.

The core of this QI project is a multilevel and interdisciplinary approach characterized by iterative processes. PDSA (Plan, Do, Study, Act) cycles were applied in all steps of conceptualization and implementation of this project. It aims to systematically improve psychosocial care of pediatric cancer patients through being implemented in a large number of hospitals in the German-speaking world. The proposed multicenter pilot phase promotes emotional well-being and level of information of the child during treatment through transfer of knowledge and coping skills. Moreover, it addresses feasibility of the tool but also the impact of medical procedures on feasibility. In the long term, the program is intended to help attenuate psychological late effects of oncological conditions and their treatments.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

240

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Graz, Austria
        • Medical University Graz
      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • Medical University of Vienna
      • Vienna, Austria, 1090
        • St. Anna Kinderspital
    • Oberösterreich
      • Linz, Oberösterreich, Austria, 4021
        • Kepler Universitätsklinikum
    • Salzburg
      • St. Veit, Salzburg, Austria, 5621
        • Rehabilitationszentrum St. Veit im Pongau
      • Bad Oeynhausen, Germany, 32549
        • Klinik Bad Oexen
      • Berlin, Germany
        • Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin
      • Bielefeld, Germany
        • Luca-Dethlefsen-Hilfe e.V.
      • Dresden, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus Dresden
      • Hamburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
      • Mannheim, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Mannheim
      • Regensburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Tübingen
      • Würzburg, Germany
        • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg
    • Hessen
      • Frankfurt am Main, Hessen, Germany, 60590
        • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt am Main
    • Niedersachsen
      • Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625
        • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
    • Nordrhein-Westfalen
      • Essen, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 45147
        • Universitätsklinikum Essen
      • Münster, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany, 48149
        • Universitatsklinikum Munster
    • Saarland
      • Homburg, Saarland, Germany, 66421
        • Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes
    • Sachsen
      • Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany, 04103
        • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig
    • Trentino-Alto Adige
      • Bolzano, Trentino-Alto Adige, Italy, 39100
        • Ospedale di Bolzano
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Inselspital, Universitätsspital Bern

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 14 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria experimental group:

  • currently or formerly treated for oncological condition
  • children/families at standard risk (Pediatric Psychosocial Preventative Health Model (PPPHM))
  • at least average cognitive abilities (as measured via intelligence test)

Inclusion Criteria control group:

  • currently or formerly treated for oncological condition

Exclusion Criteria:

  • non-German speaking
  • Major vision impairments
  • Major auditive impairments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: All Patients
Since this is a single-group study, all patients are within the same arm
Special issues/booklets of "My Logbook - I know my way around!" - Every booklet is based on evidence-based interventions. It illustrates psychosocial and interdisciplinary processes in a standardized way, resulting in a practical guide ("My Logbook") to accompany the child throughout all stages of oncological treatment.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emotional well-being, T1
Time Frame: Based on the medical therapy protocol, after medical consultation, prior to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Based on the medical therapy protocol, after medical consultation, prior to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Emotional well-being, T2
Time Frame: Post to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
Post to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Emotional well-being, T3
Time Frame: During, but before completion of treatment; prior to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
During, but before completion of treatment; prior to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Emotional well-being, T4
Time Frame: During, post to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
During, post to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Emotional well-being, T5
Time Frame: During, but before completion of treatment - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients' emotional well-being is evaluated using a visual array of emotional displays. Patients can choose three emotions that describe their current situation best. For analysis, emotions are categorized into positive, neutral, and negative emotions. Emotional well-being is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house, publication is pending.
During, but before completion of treatment - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T1
Time Frame: Based on the medical therapy protocol, after medical consultation, prior to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Based on the medical therapy protocol, after medical consultation, prior to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T2
Time Frame: Post to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
Post to first session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T3
Time Frame: During, but before completion of treatment; prior to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
During, but before completion of treatment; prior to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T4
Time Frame: During, post to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
During, post to second session of the special issue (booklet) - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Knowledgeability, T5
Time Frame: During, but before completion of treatment - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Patients are asked to rate their own knowledgeability regarding treatment, illness and hospital environment on a five-point scale ranging from "beginner" to "expert". Knowledgeability is evaluated longitudinally over multiple points of time. The diagnostic tool was developed in-house.
During, but before completion of treatment - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Feasibility of program
Time Frame: Feasibility of program is evaluated following the second session which on average takes place one to six months after start of the treatment of the special issue (booklet). - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year
Rating of feasibility of the program by medical staff
Feasibility of program is evaluated following the second session which on average takes place one to six months after start of the treatment of the special issue (booklet). - through study completion or end of medical treatment, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intelligence test
Time Frame: During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months

Patients are administered a standardized intelligence test, dependent on their age, e.g.

Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children IV WISC-IV, Petermann & Petermann, 2014 or other comparable methods due to clinical standards

During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ; Goodman, 1999)
Time Frame: During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire about 3-16 year olds.
During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
KINDLR (Ravens-Sieberer & Bullinger, 2000)
Time Frame: During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
The KINDLR is a standardized questionnaire for the assessment of quality of life in children and adolescents.
During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
Questionnaire on Health Competence in Children and Adolescents, (Weiler, Fohn, Pletschko, Schwarzinger, & Leiss, 2017)
Time Frame: During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
Questionnaire for the assessment of health competence in children and adolescents
During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
Medical information
Time Frame: Within the first week of treatment - up to three Months
Diagnosis, date of diagnosis, pre-existing conditions, secondary conditions, form of treatment/therapy, psychiatric diagnoses, neurological status
Within the first week of treatment - up to three Months
Demographic data
Time Frame: During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months
Age of patient, sex, parents' education, parents' profession, school form, mother language of patient
During the first two months from diagnosis or start of psychosocial treatment - up to three Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 7, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 17, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoma

Clinical Trials on "My Logbook! - I know my way around!"

3
Subscribe