Intralesional Steroid Injection Versus Oral Prednisolone in Prevention of Esophageal Stricture

Prospective, Randomized Trial of Intralesional Steroid Injection Versus Oral Prednisolone in Prevention of Esophageal Stricture After Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal neoplasms is already a reality and presents important advantages when compared to esophagectomy as fewer complications and better quality of life. However, extensive resections can lead to difficult-to-manage stenoses. There are several therapies available in order to prevent this stenosis but, to date, there is no definition of the gold standard.

The objective of this study was to compare the use of intralesional steroid injection versus oral prednisolone after endoscopic submucosal dissection and to evaluate the stenosis rate, number of dilations to resolve the stenosis and complications.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal neoplasms is widely used as an alternative to esophagectomy, since it is less invasive, besides presenting good clinical results. Compared with esophagectomy, patients submitted to endoscopic resection present shorter hospitalization time, lower incidence of complications and better quality of life in the long term.

However, repair of esophageal ulcer, caused by endoscopic resection, which occupies three quarters or more of the circumference of the organ, can result in the formation of stenosis.

In the past, there was no consensus on the use of preventive therapies for esophageal stenosis after extensive ESD. However, Oliveira et al recently demonstrated through systematic review and meta-analysis that the use of these therapies reduces the rate of stenosis (40% on average), decreased the number of dilations to resolve the stenosis (8 sessions less ), Without altering the number of complications.

Theoretically, corticosteroids are the most appropriate choice due to their mechanism of action, modulating wound healing by preventing inflammation, by reducing prolyl hydroxylase, which helps reduce collagen production.

However, treatment with corticosteroids, especially at high oral doses, can cause several adverse effects, such as immunosuppression, diabetes, psychiatric disorders, osteoporosis, optic lesion and peptic ulcer. Thus, the use of local corticosteroid injection could minimize these side effects. However, local injection implies risks of bleeding and perforation, and is of limited use in patients receiving anticoagulant or antiplatelet therapy.

The objective of this study was to compare the local corticosteroid injection and the use of oral corticosteroids to prevent stenosis after extensive submucosal endoscopic resection of superficial esophageal carcinoma, in relation to the stenosis rate, number of dilations necessary to resolve the stenosis and frequency of complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • São Paulo, Brazil, 01246-000
        • Recruiting
        • Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo - ICESP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a diagnosis of superficial esophageal neoplasm submitted to submucosal endoscopic resection greater than 3/4 of the organ circumference;
  • Absence of lymph node or distant metastases, evaluated through echoendoscopy, CT and PET-CT;
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of invasive esophageal neoplasia
  • Hepatical cirrhosis
  • Diabetes mellitus with fasting glycemia above 200mg%
  • Use of corticosteroids in the 30 days prior to ESD
  • INR> 1.5
  • Platelet count less than 50,000
  • Active gastrointestinal ulcer
  • Severe psychiatric illness
  • Glaucoma
  • History of allergy or hypersensitivity to corticosteroids or proton pump inhibitor

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Local steroid-triamcinolone acetonide
Local steroid (triamcinolone acetonide) injection to the ulcer immediately after ESD. Total amount of injected triamcinolone is 100 mg.
(triamcinolone acetonide)
Active Comparator: Oral steroid-predonisolone
(predonisolone) administration three days after ESD. Predonisolone is administered over 8 weeks, started at 30 mg/day and tapered 30, 30, 25, 25, 20, 15, 10 and 5 every 7 days, totaling 8 weeks of treatment.
(predonisolone)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Early Stenosis rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Stenosis to the passage of the standard endoscopic (9.8 mm)
12 weeks
Late Stenosis rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Stenosis to the passage of the standard endoscopic (9.8 mm)
24 weeks
Early resistance rate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Resistance to the passage of the standard endoscopic (9.8 mm)
12 weeks
Late resistance rate
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Resistance to the passage of the standard endoscopic (9.8 mm)
24 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of dilations to solve the stenosis
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Number of endoscopic dilations (Savary or balloon)
24 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complications
Time Frame: 24 weeks
Complications related to the procedure and preventive therapy.
24 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 21, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 21, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 21, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 4, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Esophageal Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Local steroid - triamcinolone acetonide

3
Subscribe