Eye-Control Trial: Wearable Eye-Tracking Device as Means of Communication

January 23, 2024 updated by: Ofer Sadan, Emory University

Wearable Eye-Tracking Device as Means of Communication in the Critically Ill and Mechanically Ventilated Patient

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of use of a wearable communication device for critically ill patients who are admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mechanically ventilated. The study will assess the safety, tolerability, and ease of use of the EyeControl device, and examine its potential monitoring capabilities.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Critically ill patients, who are mechanically ventilated, suffer not only from their acute, potentially devastating illness, but also from the lack of ability to communicate in an effective manner. This is the direct result of the orotracheal tube or tracheostomy required for the mechanical ventilation, which does not allow speech to be produced. On top of the mechanical change in air flow, communication challenges result from sedation, neurological injuries (primary brain injury or secondary encephalopathy), and delirium.

Lack of communication can lead to increased frustration, anxiety, and overall psychological stress and could continue to the development of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). On top of the subjective discomfort, the inability to communicate in an effective manner may impair medical care-for example, by failure to assess symptoms such as pain or breathing discomfort by behavioral cues only.

Currently, the solutions for communication deficits in mechanically ventilated patients are mainly using yes/no communication, attempting to write, and communication boards that allow people to point at defined pictures or letters. Recently, technological advancements led to incorporation of more sophisticated communication devices, proving the feasibility of an eye-tracking approach, for example.

The EyeControl is a new, wearable, eye-tracking device that facilitates communication by means of internal feedback to the patients with a bone-conducting speaker. In this way, the device can ask the patient what he or she wants to say, and the patient replies by eye gestures such as blinking or moving the eyes in a certain direction. This approach eliminates the need for calibration, as most eye-tracking devices that use a screen require, and is relatively easy to operate.

This study will assess the safety, tolerability, and ease of use of the EyeControl device.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Emory University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Admission
  • Mechanically ventilated for at least 24 hours
  • Richmond Agitation Sedation Score (RASS) between -1 to 1 at the time of screening
  • Ability to follow simple commands

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to follow commands during screening (at a minimum: open and close eyes, move eyes to one side or the other)
  • Known cerebral injury (acute or chronic) in the dominant hemisphere concerning for aphasia on clinical assessment
  • Significant pre-existing neurologic (i.e., dementia and/or cognitive deficiencies), psychiatric, or baseline communication challenges that would confound outcomes assessments
  • Inability to blink or move eyes for any reason
  • Prisoner or incarceration
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide informed consent
  • Unwillingness to be contacted for follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: EyeControl Eye-tracking Device
Ventilated ICU patients using the EyeControl wearable, eye-tracking device.
The EyeControl is a new, wearable, eye-tracking device that facilitates communication by means of internal feedback to the patients with a bone-conducting speaker. In this way, the device can ask the patient what he or she wants to say, and the patient replies by eye gestures such as blinking or moving the eyes in a certain direction. Once the patient is able to operate the device, it will stay on the patient for as long as she or he would like it on, or until the patient is successfully extubated or discharged from the ICU, whichever is earliest.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Succeeded in Operating the EyeControl Device
Time Frame: Up to Day 3
Successful operation of the device was defined as completing a set of assignments termed as a proficiency test. This proficiency test included the ability to call for help and the ability to choose a correct answer out of multiple choice questions that were read to the patient using the device. Participants were able to try to learn to operate the device once per day for up to three days.
Up to Day 3
Time To Successful Operation of the EyeControl Device
Time Frame: Up to Day 3
Successful operation of the device was defined as completing a set of assignments termed as a proficiency test. This proficiency test included the ability to call for help and the ability to choose a correct answer out of multiple choice questions that were read to the patient using the device. Participants were able to try to learn to operate the device once per day for up to three days. The time (in minutes) of training required for a patient to successfully operate the device was documented.
Up to Day 3
Number of Participants Successfully Operating the EyeControl Device Per Attempt Day
Time Frame: Up to Day 3
Successful operation of the device was defined as completing a set of assignments termed as a proficiency test. This proficiency test included the ability to call for help and the ability to choose a correct answer out of multiple choice questions that were read to the patient using the device. Participants were able to try to learn to operate the device once per day for up to three days. The study day when participants passed the proficiency test was documented.
Up to Day 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Days of Use
Time Frame: Up to end of study participation (up to 3 days)
The duration of EyeControl device use and participation in the trial was recorded in days (participation in the trial ended when use of the device ended). Participants left the trial due to inability to operate the device, patient request, technical issues, and no longer needing the device (extubation, ICU discharge).
Up to end of study participation (up to 3 days)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Wakefulness Monitoring
Time Frame: Up to extubation or ICU discharge (up to 5 days, on average)
The device will record the times in which the patient is awake by monitoring when the patient's eyes are open. This data will later be correlated with outcome measures such as delirium, length of stay, and functional outcome.
Up to extubation or ICU discharge (up to 5 days, on average)
Confusion Assessment Method in Intensive Care Unit (CAM-ICU) Validation
Time Frame: Up to extubation or ICU discharge (up to 5 days, on average)
The CAM-ICU will be administered by ICU nurses as standard of care and the examination will be repeated using the device by using multiple-choice questions and asking the patient to choose the correct answers by blinking. Correlation between the responses between collected by nurses and with the device will be assessed.
Up to extubation or ICU discharge (up to 5 days, on average)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ofer Sadan, MD, PhD, Emory University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

October 9, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 14, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 23, 2024

Last Verified

January 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data that underlie results reported in the study publications (text, tables, figures, and appendices) will be available for sharing with other researchers, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Individual participant data will be available for sharing beginning one year after article publication, with no end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Non-study investigators and researchers (i.e., external) may submit their proposal to the study investigators for approval of methodologically appropriate proposals and inquiry. Data will be available for sharing in order to achieve aims in the approved proposal. Proposals should be submitted to the PI at ofer.sadan@emory.edu. Requestors will be required to execute a data use/transfer agreement to receive a limited dataset. Data will be provided directly to external investigators.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Failure Requiring Mechanical Ventilation

Clinical Trials on EyeControl Eye-tracking Device

3
Subscribe