- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04621838
To Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the AMS ActivHeal Silicone Foam and the ActivHeal Silicone Foam Lite Dressing.
To Evaluate the Safety and Performance of the AMS ActivHeal Silicone Foam and the ActivHeal Silicone Foam Lite Dressing With Respect to Wound Exudate Management, Wound Healing Progression and Peri Wound Skin Condition.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Łódź, Poland, 94-238
- Poradnia Chorób Naczyń Obwodowych MIKOMED
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
The patient population of this evaluation will consist of patients with either a chronic or acute wound of various wound types, according to the intended use of both the AMS ActivHeal Silicone Foam and ActivHeal Silicone foam lite dressing, and they meet study eligibility criteria.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or females, age 18 years or above. (Females must not be pregnant and if of reproductive age should be using contraception).
- Subjects who are able to understand and give informed consent to take part in the evaluation.
- No local or systemic signs of infection, including new pain or increasing pain, erythema, local warmth, swelling, purulent discharge, pyrexia (in surgical wounds, typically five to seven days after surgery), delayed wound healing, abscess or malodour.
- None to high levels of exudate
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who decline the invitation to take part.
- Patients who are known to be non-compliant with medical treatment,
- Patients who are known to be sensitive to any of the dressing components.
- Broken/ damaged or prone to blistering peri wound skin.
- Presence of a clinically infected wound as determined by the presence of three or more of the following clinical signs: peri wound, erythema, pain between dressing changes, malodourous wound, abundant exudate, oedema, abscess, cellulitis, purulent discharge, discolouration, friable granulation tissue which bleeds easily.
- Patients who have a current illness or condition which may interfere with wound healing in the last 30 days which may interfere with wound healing (carcinoma, connective tissue disease, autoimmune disease or alcohol or drug abuse.)
- Life expectancy of <6 months.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Assigned intervention.
Silicone Foam Dressing. Silicone Foam Lite. Subjects will undergo treatment of their chronic or acute wound as indicated in the instructions for use with Silicone Foam dressing and Silicone Foam Lite Dressing. |
Subjects will undergo treatment of their chronic and acute wounds as indicated in instructions for use, with Silicone Foam Dressing and Silicone Foam Lite Dressing. The patients will be evaluated at each dressing change over a six-week period (per Product) or until the wound is healed to extent that the use of the Silicone Foam and Silicone Foam Lite dressing is no longer indicated from the time that the patient has been recruited. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Primary 1 Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to the management of wound exudate.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Success will be determined by no deterioration of the wound or peri wound skin.
A relative score will be used to score maceration of zero (no maceration), one (minimal maceration), two (moderate maceration), and three (excessive maceration and need to withdraw patient from study.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to Wound Healing progression.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Success will be determined by no deterioration of the wound.
The assessor will assess the wound size and the % tissue types within the wound.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to the per wound skin conditions.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Success will be determined by no deterioration of peri wound skin.
The peri wound skin will be assessed for maceration and signs of inflammation.
A relative score will be used to score maceration of zero (no maceration), one (minimal maceration), two (moderate maceration), and three (excessive maceration and need to withdraw patient from study).
Success will be determined that over the evaluation an increased score would represent peri wound deterioration.
This will be measured using VAS value (0= no erythema, redness and skin erosion and 10 = extensive erythema, redness and skin erosion).
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Effectiveness of dressing removal of both the Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
The assessor will be required to record the pain score chosen by the patient pre removal of the dressing and record the pain score chosen by the patient during removal.
Success will be determined by no increased in pain score and this will be measured using VAS value (0= no pain to 10= most pain imaginable).
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to wound pain.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Pain associated with the wound.
The assessor will be required to record the pain score chosen by the patient and record the pain score chosen by the patient.
Success will be determined by no increase in pain score and this will be measured using VAS value.
(0= no pain to 10= most pain imaginable).
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to ease of use of the dressing.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Ease of use of the dressing.
The assessor will be required to rate their level of satisfaction.
Success will be determined by no unsatisfied level of satisfaction, and this will be measured using the following 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied'.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to conformability of the dressing.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Conformability of the dressing.
The assessor will be required to rate their level of satisfaction.
Success will be determined by no unsatisfied level of satisfaction, and this will be measured using the following 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied'.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to dressing contours to anatomical contours of major wound site.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Dressing contours to anatomical contours of major wound site.
The assessor will be required to rate their level of satisfaction.
Success will be determined by no unsatisfied level of satisfaction, and this will be measured using the following 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied'.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to overall acceptability of the dressing.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Overall acceptability of the dressing.
The assessor will be required to rate their level of satisfaction.
Success will be determined by no unsatisfied level of satisfaction, and this will be measured using the following 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied'.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to peri wound skin condition.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing.
|
Peri wound skin condition satisfaction.
The assessor will be required to rate their level of satisfaction.
Success will be determined by no unsatisfied level of satisfaction, and this will be measured using the following 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied'.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing.
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to the management of exudate.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing.
|
Management of exudate satisfaction.
The assessor will be required to rate their level of satisfaction.
Success will be determined by no unsatisfied level of satisfaction, and this will be measured using the following 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied'.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing.
|
Effectiveness of both Silicone Foam and Silicone Lite dressing will assessed in regards to wound healing progression.
Time Frame: After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing.
|
Wound Healing Progression.
The assessor will be required to rate their level of satisfaction.
Success will be determined by no unsatisfied level of satisfaction, and this will be measured using the following 'highly satisfied', 'satisfied' or 'unsatisfied'.
|
After each dressing change up to 6 weeks following application of dressing.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jacek Mikosiński, MD, PhD, Poradnia Chorób Naczyń Obwodowych MIKOMED
- Principal Investigator: Katarzyna Rybołowicz, MD,PhD, Gabinet Ortopedyczny, Specjalistyczny Ośrodek Leczniczo-Badawczy,
- Principal Investigator: Konrad Pańczak, MD,PhD, NZOZ Twój Lekarz Kobierzyce,
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- WD2018-Silicone-02
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Wound
-
Brigham and Women's HospitalCompletedSurgical Wound | Wound Heal | Wound of Skin | Wound OpenUnited States
-
ConvaTec Inc.Not yet recruitingSurgical Wound, Recent | Trauma-related Wound | Dehiscence Wound | Surgical Wound LeakUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedWound Healing | Traumatic Wound | Infective Wound | Iatrogenic Critical Sized Wound DefectsUnited States
-
Indus Hospital and Health NetworkCompletedWound Closure After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Comparison of Polypropylene and Polyglactin 910 Suture.Wound Heal | Wound Complication | Wound DehiscencePakistan
-
Chulalongkorn UniversityUnknownWound Heal | Wound Surgical | Donor Site ComplicationThailand
-
Pulmatrix Inc.TerminatedPost Operative Wound Infection | Postoperative Wound Infection-deepUnited States
-
khalid abd aziz mohamedArmed Forces Hospitals, Southern Region, Saudi ArabiaUnknownDecreasing Wound InfectionSaudi Arabia
-
Central Finland Hospital DistrictUniversity of Eastern Finland; Tampere University HospitalActive, not recruitingWound Heal | Wound | Skin Wound | Skin Scarring | Wound of Skin | Wound Open | Wound BreakdownFinland
-
3MCompletedSurgical Wound, Recent | Trauma-related WoundUnited States
-
University of Witten/HerdeckeKCI Europe Holding B.V.CompletedImpaired Wound Healing | Wound Healing Disorder | Abdominal Wound Healing Disorder | Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment | Acute Postsurgical Subcutaneous WoundBelgium, Germany
Clinical Trials on Assigned interventions.
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaRecruiting
-
Dokuz Eylul UniversityCompletedSmoking Cessation | COPD | Home Visit
-
Sehitkamil Devlet HastanesiCompletedOrthopedic Surgery | Pressure InjuryTurkey
-
Sinop UniversityRecruiting
-
University of PennsylvaniaChildren's Hospital of PhiladelphiaRecruitingHealth, Subjective | Health Behavior | Environmental Exposure | Financial Stress | Mental Health Wellness | Economic ProblemsUnited States
-
Ankara Yildirim Beyazıt UniversityCompletedQuality of Life | Overactive BladderTurkey
-
Pamukkale UniversityNot yet recruitingBipolar Disorder | Motivational InterviewsTurkey
-
Colorado State UniversityCompleted
-
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityCompletedTreatment | EvaluationCyprus
-
Istanbul UniversityCompletedSelf Efficacy | Nurse's Role | Peristomal Skin Complication | Patient ComplianceTurkey