- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04702412
Electronic Capture of Adherence Barriers for HIV Care (CTNPT039)
Implementation of an Electronic Patient-reported Measure of Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence With the Opal Patient Portal: a Mixed Method Type 3 Hybrid Pilot Study at a Large Montreal HIV Clinic
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Background: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains problematic. Regular monitoring of its barriers is clinically recommended, however, patient-provider communication around adherence is often inadequate. Our team thus decided to develop a new electronically administered patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of barriers to ART adherence (the I-Score) to facilitate the systematic capture of this data for physician consideration in routine HIV care. To prepare for a controlled definitive trial to test the I-Score intervention, a pilot study was designed. Its primary objectives are to evaluate patient and physician perceptions of the I-Score intervention and its implementation strategy.
Methods: This one-arm, 6-month study will adopt a mixed method type 3 implementation-effectiveness hybrid design and be conducted at the Chronic Viral Illness Service of the McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Canada). Five HIV physicians and 30 of their HIV patients with known or suspected adherence problems will participate. The intervention will involve having patients complete the I-Score in the Opal smartphone application, before meeting with their physician. Both patient and physician will have access to the I-Score results, for consideration during the clinic visits at Times 1, 2 (3 months), and 3 (6 months). The implementation strategy will focus on stakeholder involvement, education, and training; promoting the intervention's adaptability; and hiring an Application Manager to facilitate implementation. Implementation, patient, and service outcomes will be collected (Times 1-2-3). The primary outcome is the intervention's acceptability to patients and physicians. Qualitative data obtained, in part, through physician focus groups (Times 2-3) and patient interviews (Times 2-3) will help evaluate the implementation strategy and inform any methodological adaptations.
Discussion: This study will help plan a definitive trial to test the efficacy of the I-Score intervention. It will generate needed data on electronic PROM interventions in routine HIV care that will help improve understanding of conditions for their successful implementation.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Bertrand Lebouché, MD
- Phone Number: 514-843-2090
- Email: bertrand.lebouche@mcgill.ca
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Kim Engler, PhD
- Phone Number: 32126 514-934-1934
- Email: kimcengler@gmail.com
Study Locations
-
-
Quebec
-
Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A3T2
- Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- be aged 18 years or older
- be diagnosed with HIV-1 infection
- be treated with a combination antiretroviral therapy (composed of 2 to 3 different drugs)
- be treated for HIV at the Chronic Viral Illness Service of the McGill University Health Centre
- be able to speak and understand either French or English
- possess a smartphone
- be willing to download the smartphone app
Exclusion Criteria:
- are participating in a clinical trial at the time of enrollment in this study
- have a cognitive impairment or medical instability that prevents them from participating in the interview
- have insufficient mastery of French or English to participate in the interview and complete the questionnaires
- have insufficient ability to use the app with the technical support provided
- are co-infected with hepatitis C and are being treated for it or have completed treatment 3 months or less ago
- are co-infected with hepatitis B and are either not treated for it or are being treated for it with a medication other than their anti-HIV medication
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Screening
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Opal patient portal
Exposure to routine use of a patient portal (Opal) through which HIV patients are expected to complete a measure on barriers to ART adherence for screening purposes, before each HIV care visit.
|
HIV patients will complete the I-Score PROM via Opal (patient portal) prior to three consecutive clinic visits with their HIV physician who is expected to access their PROM results in time for the visit.
The clinic visits will be held at Time 1, Time 2 (3 months) and Time 3 (6 months).
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Acceptability of the Intervention as assessed with the Acceptability E-scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Score range: 6-30 (Threshold: M ≥ 24, indicates high acceptability)
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Acceptability of the Intervention as indicated by the percent likely to recommend the I-Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
(Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Acceptability of the Intervention as assessed with the Net Promoter Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Score range: -100 to 100 (Threshold: > 0, indicates acceptability)
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Appropriateness of the Intervention as assessed with the Perceived Compatibility subscale
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Score range: 1 to 7 (Threshold: Score M ≥ 5.5, indicates high compatibility)
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Appropriateness of the Intervention as assessed with the Appropriateness of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Score range: 1 to 5 (Threshold: Score M ≥ 4, indicates high appropriateness)
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the consent rate
Time Frame: At baseline
|
Reasons for refusal will also be collected (Threshold: ≥ 70 percent)
|
At baseline
|
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the retention rate
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
(Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
|
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the missing I-Score data rate
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
e.g., due to non-completion, network failure (Threshold: ≤ 10 percent)
|
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
Feasibility of the Intervention as assessed with the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Score range: 1 to 5 (Threshold: M ≥ 4, indicates high feasibility)
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Fidelity of the Intervention as indicated by the percentage of patients who complete the I-Score on time
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
(Threshold: ≥ 90 percent)
|
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
Fidelity of the Intervention as indicated by the percentage of physicians who review the I-Score results on time
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
(Threshold: ≥ 90 percent)
|
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
Feasibility of the implementation strategy as indicated by the percentage of physicians who participate in the implementation activities
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
e.g., educational meeting, focus groups (Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
|
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
Feasibility of the implementation strategy as indicated by the number of technical issues encountered
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
Based on the Application Manager's notes
|
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Patient management as indicated by the proportion of clinical visits where physicians took action based on I-Score results
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Only among visits that identified an adherence barrier of concern with the I-Score PROM
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Barriers to ART adherence as measured by the I-Score PROM
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Score range: 1 to 20, where higher scores indicate a greater number of problematic barriers
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Adherence to ART as measured by the Self-Rating Scale Item
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
Score range: 1 to 6, where higher scores indicate higher adherence
|
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
|
HIV RNA viral load as indicated in the patient's medical file
Time Frame: Change betweem baseline (week 1) and study completion (week 24)
|
Range: Detectable, where > 50 copies/mL = detectable, an undesirable clinical outcome, or Undetectable
|
Change betweem baseline (week 1) and study completion (week 24)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bertrand Lebouché, MD, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Kildea J, Battista J, Cabral B, Hendren L, Herrera D, Hijal T, Joseph A. Design and Development of a Person-Centered Patient Portal Using Participatory Stakeholder Co-Design. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 11;21(2):e11371. doi: 10.2196/11371.
- Engler K, Ahmed S, Lessard D, Vicente S, Lebouche B. Assessing the Content Validity of a New Patient-Reported Measure of Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence for Electronic Administration in Routine HIV Care: Proposal for a Web-Based Delphi Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Aug 2;8(8):e12836. doi: 10.2196/12836.
- Lessard D, Engler K, Toupin I; I-Score Consulting Team; Routy JP, Lebouche B. Evaluation of a project to engage patients in the development of a patient-reported measure for HIV care (the I-Score Study). Health Expect. 2019 Apr;22(2):209-225. doi: 10.1111/hex.12845. Epub 2018 Oct 29.
- Engler K, Vicente S, Ma Y, Hijal T, Cox J, Ahmed S, Klein M, Achiche S, Pant Pai N, de Pokomandy A, Lacombe K, Lebouche B. Implementation of an electronic patient-reported measure of barriers to antiretroviral therapy adherence with the Opal patient portal: Protocol for a mixed method type 3 hybrid pilot study at a large Montreal HIV clinic. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 30;16(12):e0261006. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261006. eCollection 2021.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-7190
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on HIV Infections
-
University of MinnesotaWithdrawnHIV Infections | HIV/AIDS | Hiv | AIDS | Aids/Hiv Problem | AIDS and InfectionsUnited States
-
University of California, San DiegoUniversity of California, Los Angeles; University of Southern California; California... and other collaboratorsCompleted
-
Gérond'ifRecruiting
-
University of California, DavisCompleted
-
University of California, San DiegoNational Center for Complementary and Integrative Health (NCCIH)CompletedHIV PositiveUnited States
-
University of ChicagoUniversity of Athens; National Development and Research Institutes, Inc.Completed
-
HIV Prevention Trials NetworkNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); National Institute of Allergy and...CompletedHIV PositiveIndonesia, Ukraine, Vietnam
-
University of ZimbabweCompleted
-
Florida International UniversityCompleted
-
Boston Children's HospitalNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Completed
Clinical Trials on The Opal patient portal and smartphone application combined with the I-Score patient-reported outcome measure
-
H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research InstituteKite, A Gilead CompanyActive, not recruitingDiffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma | Transformed LymphomaUnited States