Electronic Capture of Adherence Barriers for HIV Care (CTNPT039)

Implementation of an Electronic Patient-reported Measure of Barriers to Antiretroviral Therapy Adherence With the Opal Patient Portal: a Mixed Method Type 3 Hybrid Pilot Study at a Large Montreal HIV Clinic

Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains problematic. Our team has thus developed a new patient-reported measure of barriers to ART adherence (the I-Score) which will be completed by HIV patients through the Opal patient portal for routine HIV care. This 6-month mixed method pilot study will implement the I-Score/Opal intervention with 5 HIV physicians at the McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Quebec) and 30 of their patients. The study's primary objectives are to assess patient and physician perceptions of the intervention (e.g., acceptability) and evaluate the implementation strategy. The data collected will help plan and determine the feasibility of a definitive effectiveness trial.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains problematic. Regular monitoring of its barriers is clinically recommended, however, patient-provider communication around adherence is often inadequate. Our team thus decided to develop a new electronically administered patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) of barriers to ART adherence (the I-Score) to facilitate the systematic capture of this data for physician consideration in routine HIV care. To prepare for a controlled definitive trial to test the I-Score intervention, a pilot study was designed. Its primary objectives are to evaluate patient and physician perceptions of the I-Score intervention and its implementation strategy.

Methods: This one-arm, 6-month study will adopt a mixed method type 3 implementation-effectiveness hybrid design and be conducted at the Chronic Viral Illness Service of the McGill University Health Centre (Montreal, Canada). Five HIV physicians and 30 of their HIV patients with known or suspected adherence problems will participate. The intervention will involve having patients complete the I-Score in the Opal smartphone application, before meeting with their physician. Both patient and physician will have access to the I-Score results, for consideration during the clinic visits at Times 1, 2 (3 months), and 3 (6 months). The implementation strategy will focus on stakeholder involvement, education, and training; promoting the intervention's adaptability; and hiring an Application Manager to facilitate implementation. Implementation, patient, and service outcomes will be collected (Times 1-2-3). The primary outcome is the intervention's acceptability to patients and physicians. Qualitative data obtained, in part, through physician focus groups (Times 2-3) and patient interviews (Times 2-3) will help evaluate the implementation strategy and inform any methodological adaptations.

Discussion: This study will help plan a definitive trial to test the efficacy of the I-Score intervention. It will generate needed data on electronic PROM interventions in routine HIV care that will help improve understanding of conditions for their successful implementation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montréal, Quebec, Canada, H4A3T2
        • Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • be aged 18 years or older
  • be diagnosed with HIV-1 infection
  • be treated with a combination antiretroviral therapy (composed of 2 to 3 different drugs)
  • be treated for HIV at the Chronic Viral Illness Service of the McGill University Health Centre
  • be able to speak and understand either French or English
  • possess a smartphone
  • be willing to download the smartphone app

Exclusion Criteria:

  • are participating in a clinical trial at the time of enrollment in this study
  • have a cognitive impairment or medical instability that prevents them from participating in the interview
  • have insufficient mastery of French or English to participate in the interview and complete the questionnaires
  • have insufficient ability to use the app with the technical support provided
  • are co-infected with hepatitis C and are being treated for it or have completed treatment 3 months or less ago
  • are co-infected with hepatitis B and are either not treated for it or are being treated for it with a medication other than their anti-HIV medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Opal patient portal
Exposure to routine use of a patient portal (Opal) through which HIV patients are expected to complete a measure on barriers to ART adherence for screening purposes, before each HIV care visit.
HIV patients will complete the I-Score PROM via Opal (patient portal) prior to three consecutive clinic visits with their HIV physician who is expected to access their PROM results in time for the visit. The clinic visits will be held at Time 1, Time 2 (3 months) and Time 3 (6 months).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Acceptability of the Intervention as assessed with the Acceptability E-scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Score range: 6-30 (Threshold: M ≥ 24, indicates high acceptability)
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Acceptability of the Intervention as indicated by the percent likely to recommend the I-Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
(Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Acceptability of the Intervention as assessed with the Net Promoter Score
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Score range: -100 to 100 (Threshold: > 0, indicates acceptability)
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Appropriateness of the Intervention as assessed with the Perceived Compatibility subscale
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Score range: 1 to 7 (Threshold: Score M ≥ 5.5, indicates high compatibility)
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Appropriateness of the Intervention as assessed with the Appropriateness of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Score range: 1 to 5 (Threshold: Score M ≥ 4, indicates high appropriateness)
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the consent rate
Time Frame: At baseline
Reasons for refusal will also be collected (Threshold: ≥ 70 percent)
At baseline
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the retention rate
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
(Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the Intervention as indicated by the missing I-Score data rate
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
e.g., due to non-completion, network failure (Threshold: ≤ 10 percent)
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the Intervention as assessed with the Feasibility of Intervention Measure
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Score range: 1 to 5 (Threshold: M ≥ 4, indicates high feasibility)
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Fidelity of the Intervention as indicated by the percentage of patients who complete the I-Score on time
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
(Threshold: ≥ 90 percent)
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Fidelity of the Intervention as indicated by the percentage of physicians who review the I-Score results on time
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
(Threshold: ≥ 90 percent)
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the implementation strategy as indicated by the percentage of physicians who participate in the implementation activities
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
e.g., educational meeting, focus groups (Threshold: ≥ 80 percent)
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Feasibility of the implementation strategy as indicated by the number of technical issues encountered
Time Frame: Cumulative until study completion (week 24)
Based on the Application Manager's notes
Cumulative until study completion (week 24)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient management as indicated by the proportion of clinical visits where physicians took action based on I-Score results
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Only among visits that identified an adherence barrier of concern with the I-Score PROM
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Barriers to ART adherence as measured by the I-Score PROM
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Score range: 1 to 20, where higher scores indicate a greater number of problematic barriers
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Adherence to ART as measured by the Self-Rating Scale Item
Time Frame: Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
Score range: 1 to 6, where higher scores indicate higher adherence
Change from baseline (week 1) to study completion (week 24)
HIV RNA viral load as indicated in the patient's medical file
Time Frame: Change betweem baseline (week 1) and study completion (week 24)
Range: Detectable, where > 50 copies/mL = detectable, an undesirable clinical outcome, or Undetectable
Change betweem baseline (week 1) and study completion (week 24)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bertrand Lebouché, MD, McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 11, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2021

Last Verified

January 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV Infections

Clinical Trials on The Opal patient portal and smartphone application combined with the I-Score patient-reported outcome measure

3
Subscribe