- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04741880
Evaluation of Intravenous Lidocaine and Time to Regression of the Sensory Block After Spinal Anesthesia (ELSA Trial) (ELSA)
Intravenous Lidocaine and Time to Regression of the Sensory Block After Spinal Anesthesia With Isobaric Bupivacaine in Patients Undergoing Surgery to Treat Skin and Soft Tissue Tumors of the Lower Limbs
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Hypotheses:
Null hypothesis
H0: The time to T12 regression of the sensory block after administration of isobaric bupivacaine is EQUAL with or without the use of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion.
Alternative hypothesis
H1: The time to T12 regression of the sensory block after administration of isobaric bupivacaine is DIFFERENT depending on the use or not of intravenous lidocaine in continuous infusion.
Methods
Study design
It is a randomized, controlled, triple blind clinical trial (patient, assistant team / investigator, and data collection/analysis).
Standard procedures
All patients should undergo an outpatient preoperative evaluation with an anesthesiologist. At that moment, eligibility for the study will be evaluated and the informed consent form will be presented. The preoperative form will also be completed by the investigator of the study who includes the patient of the patient.
Study participants will undergo continuous 5 leads electrocardiographic, automated noninvasive blood pressure and capnography monitoring initiated at the entrance to the operating room. Peripheral venous access will also be obtained. After certification of monitoring and venous access the patient will be positioned in lateral decubitus with the side to be performed the surgery (or the side of higher major surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures) superiorly (e.g. surgery with right side of the body the puncture will be performed in left lateral decubitus) and then will be initiated the infusion the solutions present in the syringe and in the bag sent by the Division of Pharmacy of the hospital unit according to the protocol. Immediately after the initiation of continuous infusion of the solution the anesthesiologist will begin preparation for performing subarachnoid puncture with a Quinke needle between 22 and 27 Gauge (preferably 26 Gauge) between spaces L4-L5 and L2-L3 (preferably L3-L4) depending on the assessment of the anesthesiologist responsible for the predicted difficulty for the block and the risk of post-dural puncture headache. Conscious sedation with propofol in continuous infusion and local anesthesia with 1% lidocaine solution up to 100 mg will also be initiated. It will be administered in the subarachnoid space 13mg (2.6 ml of solution) of isobaric bupivacaine at 0.5%.
As a multimodal and antiemetic analgesia regimen, the following will be administered:
- dexamethasone 4mg in the operating room;
- ondansetron 4mg in the operating room and in case of postoperative nausea or vomiting;
- dipyrone 20mg.kg-1 every 4 hours or paracetamol 500mg every 4 hours (in case of dipyrone allergy) started before regional anesthesia and kept until discharge;
- tenoxicam 40mg in the OR and 20 mg on the first postoperative day, unless contraindicated by the assistant team;
- tramadol 50mg up to every 4 hours or morphine 4 mg up to every 10 minutes in case of pain assessed by verbal numerical scale greater than or equal to 4 (0-10) or according to evaluation of the assistant team.
After the block, evaluations of the extension of sensory and motor block will be performed at minutes 5, 10, 15 and then every 15 minutes as presented in the data collection form . The sensory block will be evaluated by pinprick sequentially from the most caudal to the most cephalic level, at the midclavicular line, on the opposite side of the surgical procedure (or on the side of minor surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures) and will be computed as the level of blockade the point at which the patient reports sensitivity similar to reference point (homolateral shoulder) will be computed. Motor block will be initially evaluated for ankle flexion, followed by knee elevation and finally leg elevation with knees extended, and the level of motor block will be recorded according to the modified Bromage scale on the opposite side of the surgical procedure (or on the side of lower surgical trauma in case of bilateral procedures).
The patient will be released for the surgical procedure as soon as he reaches motor block evidenced by a modified Bromage scale equal to 2. During the procedure, only sensory block will be observed so that there is no interference with the surgical procedure. After the end of the procedure, each 15 minutes evaluations of sensory and motor block will be performed. Supplementary sensory and motor status evaluations may be performed in addition to the evaluations every 15 minutes at the discretion of the assistant team. After the end of the surgery. Sensory block and motor block will be evaluated concomitantly until the primary outcome (regression of sensory block up T12 dermatome), regression of motor block to modified Bromage 1 and regression of two dermatomes of the sensory block (secondary outcomes) are achieved.
The patient will be continuously evaluated in the post-anesthetic recovery room until at least the second postoperative hour and until the primary outcome. Twenty-four hours after the end of the procedure, the patient will be reevaluated at the ward, or by phone contact in case of discharge, and the study information and questionnaires will be computed as described in the data collection form.
Intervention
The bolus and infusion of the solution referring to the allocated group will be made:
- After monitoring and obtaining venous access
- Prior to the initiation of continuous propofol infusion and spinal puncture
Group L (Lidocaine):
Lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of lidocaine infusion.
Lidocaine 2mg.kg-1.h-1.
Group S (saline solution):
Lidocaine bolus 0.75 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of saline infusion.
Saline solution.
Group L will be sent a 20 ml syringe of 2% lidocaine and 200 ml of lidocaine solution at 8mg.ml-1 (80ml of 2% lidocaine associated with 120ml 0.9% sodium chloride) Group S will be sent a 20 ml syringe of 1% lidocaine and 200 ml of saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride)
A syringe with 20 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.
Continuous infusion of lidocaine (group L) or saline solution (group S) will be maintained until the sensory block regresses to the T12 level, until the regression of 2 dermatomes of the sensory block and until the motor block reaches the score on the modified Bromage scale 1.
The infusion will be interrupted and the masking will be broken in case of:
- severe neurological disorders (e.g. seizure, respiratory depression);
- cardiac (e.g. atrioventricular block greater than second degree, bradycardia with HR less than 40 bpm not responsive to atropine, refractory hypotension);
- other unforeseen clinical changes that pose a risk to the patient.
The infusion will be maintained until the end of anesthesia and masking in case of need for conversion to general anesthesia (e.g., insufficient block, psychomotor agitation) and the patient will be (1) censored for the outcomes related to the extension of the blockade and (2) will continue contributing to the other outcomes.
Collected variables
The variables evaluated in the study will be collected preoperatively, at the operating room, at the PACU, in the first 24 postoperative hours, and in 30 days and recorded in the RedCap database. All data collected in the study is available at the data collection sheets.
Statistical analysis
Medical records numbers and names will be included in the data collection but will not be imputed in RedCap. Therefore, the participants' data will not be revealed at the time of data extraction and analysis, preserving the anonymity of the research individuals.
The data extracted from RedCap will be analyzed in software R. The groups will be separated by intervention group, but the researcher responsible for the analysis will only have access to the groups after the end of the analysis of the results.
Continuous variables will be presented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range depending on their distribution. To check the comparability between the groups and study, the basal covariates will be presented by intervention group. Bivariate statistical tests will be performed bicaudal chi-squared test, t-test, nonparametric Mann-Whitney test and log rank test depending on the characteristics of the variable. In the outcome "most rostral dermatome achieved by sensory block" each dermatome will be numbered for statistical analysis from S5 to C6 according to the following examples: S5=1, S4=2, S3=3, C8=23, C7=24 and C6=25 and will be analyzed according to its distribution. The primary outcome will be presented graphically by the Kaplan Meier curve. The value of α was set at 0.05. For the primary outcome, the p-value will be analyzed without adjustment for multiple tests. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated without adjustment for multiple comparisons because it is an exploratory analysis.
The sample size was calculation was performed with the software R, package 'WMWssp', command 'WMWssp'. Based on previous studies, the mean time for regression was estimated at 120 minutes standard deviation for sensory block regression after subarachnoid anesthesia with bupivacaine in 20 minutes. Adopting the α value of 0.05, the power of 80%, and a 10% drop out rate, the estimated sample size to demonstrate the difference of 15 minutes in the primary outcome was 66 patients (R software input: 'WMWssp(round(rnorm(1000000, 120, 20)), rnorm(1000000, 135, 20), alpha = 0.05, power = 0.8, t = 1/2, simulation = FALSE, nsim = 10^4)').
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Bruno LC Araujo, MSc, EDAIC
- Phone Number: +5521988400944
- Email: brunoaraujomed@yahoo.com.br
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Andreia C de Melo, PhD
- Email: andreia.melo@inca.gov.br
Study Locations
-
-
-
Rio De Janeiro, Brazil, 20270212
- Recruiting
- Hospital de Câncer II, INCA
-
Contact:
- Bruno LC Araujo, MSc
- Phone Number: +552132072915
- Email: brunoaraujomed@yahoo.com.BR
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age between 18 and 85 years-old
- The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status classification from I to III
- To be submitted to:
- - Spinal Anesthesia
- - For surgeries performed by the Bone and Connective Tissue (TOC) service
- - Involving lower limbs and inguinal region requiring sensory block level up to the T12 dermatome (except for larger amputations and bone resections)
- - Expected duration of less than 120 minutes
- - In supine position
- That they voluntarily decide to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Coagulation disorder that prevents the execution of the blockade:
- - International normalized ratio for prothrombin (INR) time and activity > 1.5
- - Activated partial thromboplastin time ratio (PTTa) >1.5
- - Use of enoxaparin up to 40mg/day less than 12h before the procedure
- - Use of enoxaparin above 40mg/day less than 24hours before the procedure
- - Use of oral anticoagulant or platelet aggregation inhibitors in a lower interval than recommended for spinal block
- - Other coagulation disorders that prevent spinal anesthesia
- Moderate or severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction (defined by the presence of left ventricle ejection fraction below 40%)
- Sinus bradycardia (FC < 50 beats per minute)
- Relevant cardiac conduction system disorders (e.g. atrium ventricular block greater than first-degree, Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome)
- Clinically significant arrhythmia (e.g. atrial fibrillation)
- Body mass index (BMI) than > 35 mg.kg-1
- Previous diagnosis of liver cirrhosis
- Creatinine clearance < 30 ml/min/1.73m2 estimated by the method of the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) study group
- Infection at the site of lumbar puncture
- Previous spinal surgery
- Allergy to local anesthetics amino-amides
- Difficulty in communication, understanding or cognitive deficit that prevents adequate oral response to study the study forms
- Pre-existing neurological lesion in topography to be evaluated motor block
- Documented or suspected spinal or central nervous system metastasis
- Regular use of strong opioids at a dose equal or greater than 60 mg of oral morphine equivalents per day
- Desire to withdraw from the study at any time of its execution
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: QUADRUPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Group L (Lidocaine)
Lidocaine bolus 1.5 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of lidocaine infusion Lidocaine 2mg.kg-1.h-1
|
Will be sent to Group L a 10 ml syringe of 2% lidocaine and 200 ml of lidocaine solution at 8mg.ml-1 (80ml of 2% lidocaine associated with 120ml 0.9% sodium chloride) A syringe with 10 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.
Other Names:
|
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Group S (saline solution)
Lidocaine bolus 0.75 mg.kg-1 intravenous before the onset of saline infusion Saline solution infusion
|
Group S will be sent a 10 ml syringe of 1% lidocaine and 200 ml of saline solution (0.9% sodium chloride) A syringe with 10 ml of solution and a bag with 200 ml of solution indistinguishable between the groups, with the identification of the patient by label prepared specifically for the study will be prepared by the Pharmacy personal. The bag and the solution will be sealed in a waterproof and opaque envelope and sent to the Operating Theatre (OT). The envelope will be stored in the refrigerator of the sector between 3º C and 8º C until the patient is sent to the operating room, when the drugs will be sent to the operating room. At the time designated for the start of the intervention, a bolus of 0.075 ml.kg-1 of the syringe solution, followed by 0.25 ml.kg-1.h-1 in the infusion pump of the solution in the bag will be administered.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to T12 regression of the sensory block
Time Frame: Period: Day 0 postoperative
|
Time between the injection of bupivacaine into the subarachnoid space and the regression of sensory block to T12 dermatome (in minutes)
|
Period: Day 0 postoperative
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Time to motor block regression
Time Frame: Day 0 postoperative
|
Time between the injection of bupivacaine into the subarachnoid space and the regression of motor block to the modified Bromage scale 1 (in minutes)
|
Day 0 postoperative
|
Most rostral dermatome achieved by the sensory block
Time Frame: Day 0 postoperative
|
Evaluated as ordinal variable (see statistical analysis)
|
Day 0 postoperative
|
Time to two-segment regression of the sensory block
Time Frame: Day 0 postoperative
|
Time between the injection of bupivacaine into the subarachnoid space and the regression of 2 dermatomes sensory block level (in minutes)
|
Day 0 postoperative
|
Propofol dose at the operating room
Time Frame: Intraoperative
|
In mg
|
Intraoperative
|
Time to the first opioid rescue
Time Frame: Intraoperative
|
In mg
|
Intraoperative
|
Postoperative pain score at rest
Time Frame: Admission to the PACU, 2 postoperative hours, 24 postoperative hours, and worse in the first 24 postoperative hours measurements
|
Verbal numerical scale between 0 and 10, being 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable"
|
Admission to the PACU, 2 postoperative hours, 24 postoperative hours, and worse in the first 24 postoperative hours measurements
|
Pain score at movement
Time Frame: 24 postoperative hours
|
Verbal numerical scale between 0 and 10, being 0 = "no pain" and 10 = "worst pain imaginable"
|
24 postoperative hours
|
Quality of recovery in 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 postoperative hours
|
Quality of recovery measured by the "40-item quality-of-recovery questionnaire" (QoR-40)
|
24 postoperative hours
|
Need for opioid analgesics (binary)
Time Frame: Between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
YES/NO
|
Between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
Need for opioid analgesics (continuous)
Time Frame: between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
In oral morphine equivalents (in mg)
|
between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
Nausea or vomiting
Time Frame: Between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
Presence of nausea or vomiting reported by the patient - YES/NO
|
Between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
Dizziness
Time Frame: From intraoperative to 24 postoperative hours
|
Report of dizziness by patient - YES/NO
|
From intraoperative to 24 postoperative hours
|
Bradycardia
Time Frame: At the operating room (OR) and admission to the PACU up to 24 postoperative hours
|
Heart rate below 50 beats per minute (YES/NO)
|
At the operating room (OR) and admission to the PACU up to 24 postoperative hours
|
Other arrhythmias
Time Frame: At the OR and admission to the PACU up to 24 postoperative hours
|
Heart rhythm change except sinus bradycardia and sinus tachycardia (YES/NO)
|
At the OR and admission to the PACU up to 24 postoperative hours
|
Hypotension
Time Frame: At the OR, between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
MAP < 65mmHg or presence of compatible symptoms (such as nausea, vomiting or cognitive impairments)
|
At the OR, between 0 and 6 postoperative hours, between 6 and 24 postoperative hours, and between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
Urinary retention
Time Frame: Between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
Voiding difficulty that requires bladder catheterization for relief by the assistant team
|
Between 0 and 24 postoperative hours
|
Length of stay
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 30 days
|
Time between the end of the operation and administrative discharge in days
|
Through study completion, an average of 30 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Bruno LC Araujo, MSc, EDAIC, Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital do Câncer II, Instituto Nacional do Câncer
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Miller RD. Miller's Anesthesia. 7th ed. Phyladelphia: Churchill Livingstone/Elsevier; 2010.
- Imbelloni LE, Moreira AD, Gaspar FC, Gouveia MA, Cordeiro JA. Assessment of the densities of local anesthetics and their combination with adjuvants: an experimental study. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2009 Mar-Apr;59(2):154-65. doi: 10.1590/s0034-70942009000200003. English, Portuguese.
- Lui AC, Polis TZ, Cicutti NJ. Densities of cerebrospinal fluid and spinal anaesthetic solutions in surgical patients at body temperature. Can J Anaesth. 1998 Apr;45(4):297-303. doi: 10.1007/BF03012018.
- Beloeil H. Opioid-free anesthesia. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2019 Sep;33(3):353-360. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
- Blaudszun G, Lysakowski C, Elia N, Tramer MR. Effect of perioperative systemic alpha2 agonists on postoperative morphine consumption and pain intensity: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesthesiology. 2012 Jun;116(6):1312-22. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31825681cb.
- Gelineau AM, King MR, Ladha KS, Burns SM, Houle T, Anderson TA. Intraoperative Esmolol as an Adjunct for Perioperative Opioid and Postoperative Pain Reduction: A Systematic Review, Meta-analysis, and Meta-regression. Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):1035-1049. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002469.
- Ng KT, Yap JLL, Izham IN, Teoh WY, Kwok PE, Koh WJ. The effect of intravenous magnesium on postoperative morphine consumption in noncardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2020 Mar;37(3):212-223. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001164.
- Wang X, Lin C, Lan L, Liu J. Perioperative intravenous S-ketamine for acute postoperative pain in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2021 Feb;68:110071. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.110071. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
- Weibel S, Jokinen J, Pace NL, Schnabel A, Hollmann MW, Hahnenkamp K, Eberhart LH, Poepping DM, Afshari A, Kranke P. Efficacy and safety of intravenous lidocaine for postoperative analgesia and recovery after surgery: a systematic review with trial sequential analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):770-83. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew101.
- Hermanns H, Hollmann MW, Stevens MF, Lirk P, Brandenburger T, Piegeler T, Werdehausen R. Molecular mechanisms of action of systemic lidocaine in acute and chronic pain: a narrative review. Br J Anaesth. 2019 Sep;123(3):335-349. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.06.014. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
- Dunn LK, Durieux ME. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Anesthesiology. 2017 Apr;126(4):729-737. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001527. No abstract available.
- Ghimire A, Subedi A, Bhattarai B, Sah BP. The effect of intraoperative lidocaine infusion on opioid consumption and pain after totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic inguinal hernioplasty: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Jun 3;20(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-01054-2.
- Farag E, Ghobrial M, Sessler DI, Dalton JE, Liu J, Lee JH, Zaky S, Benzel E, Bingaman W, Kurz A. Effect of perioperative intravenous lidocaine administration on pain, opioid consumption, and quality of life after complex spine surgery. Anesthesiology. 2013 Oct;119(4):932-40. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318297d4a5.
- Choi GJ, Kang H, Ahn EJ, Oh JI, Baek CW, Jung YH, Kim JY. Clinical Efficacy of Intravenous Lidocaine for Thyroidectomy: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. World J Surg. 2016 Dec;40(12):2941-2947. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3619-6.
- Beaussier M, Delbos A, Maurice-Szamburski A, Ecoffey C, Mercadal L. Perioperative Use of Intravenous Lidocaine. Drugs. 2018 Aug;78(12):1229-1246. doi: 10.1007/s40265-018-0955-x.
- Gustafsson UO, Scott MJ, Schwenk W, Demartines N, Roulin D, Francis N, McNaught CE, Macfie J, Liberman AS, Soop M, Hill A, Kennedy RH, Lobo DN, Fearon K, Ljungqvist O; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):259-84. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1772-0. No abstract available.
- Melloul E, Lassen K, Roulin D, Grass F, Perinel J, Adham M, Wellge EB, Kunzler F, Besselink MG, Asbun H, Scott MJ, Dejong CHC, Vrochides D, Aloia T, Izbicki JR, Demartines N. Guidelines for Perioperative Care for Pancreatoduodenectomy: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Recommendations 2019. World J Surg. 2020 Jul;44(7):2056-2084. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05462-w.
- Nygren J, Thacker J, Carli F, Fearon KC, Norderval S, Lobo DN, Ljungqvist O, Soop M, Ramirez J; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society, for Perioperative Care; European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN); International Association for Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition (IASMEN). Guidelines for perioperative care in elective rectal/pelvic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS((R))) Society recommendations. World J Surg. 2013 Feb;37(2):285-305. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1787-6. No abstract available.
- Khezri MB, Rajabi M, Yaghoobi S, Barikani A. Effect of intravenous lignocaine infusion on bispectral index during spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section: A prospective randomised double-blind study. Indian J Anaesth. 2020 May;64(5):369-374. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_424_19. Epub 2020 May 1.
- Levey AS, Coresh J, Greene T, Stevens LA, Zhang YL, Hendriksen S, Kusek JW, Van Lente F; Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration. Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004. Erratum In: Ann Intern Med. 2008 Oct 7;149(7):519. Ann Intern Med. 2021 Apr;174(4):584.
- Park SK, Lee JH, Yoo S, Kim WH, Lim YJ, Bahk JH, Kim JT. Comparison of bupivacaine plus intrathecal fentanyl and bupivacaine alone for spinal anesthesia with intravenous dexmedetomidine sedation: a randomized, double-blind, noninferiority trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Apr;44(4):459-465. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2018-100084. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
- Verret M, Lauzier F, Zarychanski R, Perron C, Savard X, Pinard AM, Leblanc G, Cossi MJ, Neveu X, Turgeon AF; Canadian Perioperative Anesthesia Clinical Trials (PACT) Group. Perioperative Use of Gabapentinoids for the Management of Postoperative Acute Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2020 Aug;133(2):265-279. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000003428. Erratum In: Anesthesiology. 2020 Aug 21;:null.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Anti-Arrhythmia Agents
- Central Nervous System Depressants
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Sensory System Agents
- Anesthetics
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Anesthetics, Local
- Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel Blockers
- Sodium Channel Blockers
- Lidocaine
Other Study ID Numbers
- 40904720.3.0000.5274
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Cancer
-
University of Michigan Rogel Cancer CenterRecruitingCancer Liver | Cancer Brain | Cancer Head &Neck | Cancer PelvisUnited States
-
Cellworks Group Inc.RecruitingCancer | Relapsed Cancer | Refractory CancerUnited States
-
UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer CenterHyundai Hope On WheelsRecruitingCancer | Pediatric Cancer | Survivorship | Cancer MetastaticUnited States
-
Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer CenterNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Active, not recruitingAdvanced Cancer | Relapsed Cancer | Refractory CancerUnited States
-
MiRXES Pte LtdRecruitingBreast Cancer | Gastric Cancer | Colorectal Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer | Esophageal Cancer | Ovarian Cancer | Prostate Cancer | Thoracic Cancer | Liver CancerSingapore
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage III Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IV Gastric Cancer | Stage IVA Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVA Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer | Stage IVB Pancreatic Cancer | Stage IIIA Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIB Gastric Cancer | Stage IIIC Gastric... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson...CompletedStage I Breast Cancer | Stage I Uterine Corpus Cancer | Stage II Uterine Corpus Cancer | Stage III Uterine Corpus Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IA Breast Cancer | Stage IB Breast Cancer | Stage IIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIB Breast Cancer | Stage... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Massachusetts General HospitalNational Comprehensive Cancer NetworkCompletedGastric Cancer | Pancreatic Cancer | Esophageal Cancer | Rectal Cancer | Colon Cancer | Hepatobiliary CancerUnited States
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Cancer Institute (NCI); National Institute on Minority Health and...Enrolling by invitationCancer | Advanced Cancer | End Stage Cancer | MalignancyUnited States
-
University of California, San FranciscoBristol-Myers Squibb; PfizerTerminatedStage IIIA Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIB Rectal Cancer | Stage IIIC Rectal Cancer | Metastatic Colorectal Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic Colon Adenocarcinoma | Metastatic Rectal Adenocarcinoma | Stage IIIA Colon Cancer | Stage IIIB Colon Cancer | Stage IIIC Colon Cancer | Stage IV Colon Cancer | Stage IV Rectal... and other conditionsUnited States
Clinical Trials on Lidocaine IV
-
Aswan University HospitalUnknown
-
Benha UniversityCompletedPostcesarean Pain Relief
-
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University...UnknownPostoperative PainKorea, Republic of
-
Aswan University HospitalUnknownCesarean Section ComplicationsEgypt
-
Rhode Island HospitalRecruitingArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | Total Knee ArthroplastyUnited States
-
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University...CompletedPostoperative PainKorea, Republic of
-
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University...UnknownPostoperative PainKorea, Republic of
-
Chung-Ang University Hosptial, Chung-Ang University...UnknownPostoperative PainKorea, Republic of
-
Alexandria UniversityUniversity of AlexandriaRecruiting
-
Derince Training and Research HospitalRecruiting