Effect of Task-oriented Circuit Training on Gait Kinematics, Pelvic Symmetry and Endurance in Children With Hemiplegia

March 18, 2022 updated by: Mohamed Salah El-Sayed, Horus University

Statement of the problem:

Does task-oriented circuit training have an effect on kinematic parameters of gait, pelvic symmetry and trunk endurance in children with hemiplegic CP?

Purpose of the study:

This study aims to:

  • Investigate the effect of exercise-based task-oriented circuit training on gait kinematics including (Stride length, step length, cadence, walking speed, ankle dorsiflexion angle in initial contact, knee extension angle in midstance and hip extension angle in terminal stance) in children with hemiplegic CP.
  • Determine the effect of task-oriented circuit training on pelvic symmetry including (Anterior and lateral pelvic tilting) in children with hemiplegic CP.
  • Examine the effect of task-oriented circuit training on trunk endurance including (prone plank test, timed partial curl up test, front abdominal power test and unilateral supine bridge test) in children with hemiplegic CP.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Children with CP have lowered physical fitness levels because their motor impairments restrict their participation in daily physical activities. Children with hemiplegic CP may experience a variety of concomitant health conditions including, movement difficulty, postural and balance instability, muscle spasticity, difficulty with motor planning and control, and cognitive impairments. They also have diminished force generation, debilitated proprioception around the core, lack of enough harmonization in core musculature, and diminished capacity to adjust coupling between the trunk, pelvis, and hip stabilizers leading to diminished proficiency of movement.

According to the concept of motor learning, training is considered to be most effective when the training task is specific to the intended outcome, as optimal improvement in function involves the practice of task-specific activities. Due to the shift in focus on functional movements rather than muscle activity or movement patterns, there has been a task-oriented approach which is based on the system model of motor control providing motivation due to specific achievements that can be made.

Task-oriented circuit training effectively provides various sensory stimulation and promotes functional activities for stroke patients; however, more attention is becoming directed to children with CP to examine the effect of the task-oriented circuit training program on functional performance in children with CP. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the effect of rehabilitation delivered as a task-oriented circuit exercise program on kinematic parameters of gait, pelvic symmetry, and trunk endurance in children with hemiplegic CP.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 34518
        • Outpatient clinic, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

7 years to 10 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Their age will be ranged from 7-10 years.
  • Their motor function will be at level I and II according to Gross Motor Function Classification System GMFCS (Palisano et al., 2008).
  • The degree of spasticity will range from mild to moderate according to Modified Ashworth Scale (Bohannon and Smith, 1987).
  • They will be able to follow instructions during evaluation and treatment.

Exclusion Criteria:

Children will be excluded from the study if they have:

  • Other types of cerebral palsy.
  • Cardiovascular or respiratory disorders.
  • Botulinium muscular injection in the last 6 months
  • Surgical interference in lower limbs and/or spine.
  • Muscloskeletal problems or fixed deformities in the spine and/or lower extremities.
  • seizures.
  • Visual or hearing impairment.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Selected Physical Therapy group
will receive a selected physical therapy program for 90 minutes, 3 times/week for 3 successive months.
  • Facilitation of balance reactions from standing position including; standing on one leg, weight shifting from standing position, stoop and recover from standing, squat from standing and standing on balance board.
  • Facilitation of counterpoising mechanism through instructing the child to kick ball from standing position as well as catching and throwing ball with his hands.
  • Gait training activities including: walking using different obstacles (rolls, wedges, stepper) and walking up and down stairs.
  • Facilitation of protective reaction from standing position by pushing the child in different directions.
  • Facilitation of rising mechanism through changing position as well as returning back to the original position e.g.: from lying to standing and from sitting to standing.
  • Strengthening exercises for back and abdominal muscles as well as upper and lower limbs.
  • Jumping in place and jumping a board.
Experimental: Task-oriented circuit training group
Children allocated to the study group will receive the same selected physical therapy program given to the control group for 45 minutes in addition to 45 minutes task-oriented circuit training program. The frequency of the whole program will be three times per week, for three months.
  • Facilitation of balance reactions from standing position including; standing on one leg, weight shifting from standing position, stoop and recover from standing, squat from standing and standing on balance board.
  • Facilitation of counterpoising mechanism through instructing the child to kick ball from standing position as well as catching and throwing ball with his hands.
  • Gait training activities including: walking using different obstacles (rolls, wedges, stepper) and walking up and down stairs.
  • Facilitation of protective reaction from standing position by pushing the child in different directions.
  • Facilitation of rising mechanism through changing position as well as returning back to the original position e.g.: from lying to standing and from sitting to standing.
  • Strengthening exercises for back and abdominal muscles as well as upper and lower limbs.
  • Jumping in place and jumping a board.
The task-oriented circuit training program consisted of 14 workstations. Time spent at each station will be 1.5 minutes. The children will complete the activity at one station and move to another station. The whole circuit will be completed in 21 minutes and it will be repeated twice per session with 3 minutes rest interval between the 2 circuits. Children will be encouraged to work as hard as possible at each workstation and will also be given verbal feedback and instructions aimed at improving performance. The progression of the task will be considered according to each child's ability and progressed as tolerated. Progressions include increasing the number of repetitions and increasing complexity of the exercise performed at each workstation, such as the distance reached in standing, reducing the height of the chair during sit-to stand, changing the height of blocks or by increasing speed of movement.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the change in Angular displacement of joints during gait cycle
Time Frame: at baseline and after 3 months of intervention
assessment via using 2D gait analysis by Kinovea software in order to measure change in angular displacement of joints during gait cycle including: angle of ankle dorsiflexion at initial contact, angle of knee extension at midstance and angle of hip extension during terminal stance. All of these measurements have the same unit which is (angle in degrees)
at baseline and after 3 months of intervention
Assessing the change in Pelvic symmetry
Time Frame: at baseline and after 3 months of intervention
by using palpation meter inclinometer to measure the change in anterior and lateral pelvic tilting angles in degrees
at baseline and after 3 months of intervention
Assessing the change in spatial parameters of gait
Time Frame: at baseline and after 3 months of intervention
assessment via using 2D gait analysis by Kinovea software in order to measure change in step length and stride length in centimeters.
at baseline and after 3 months of intervention
Assessing the change in Temporal parameters of gait
Time Frame: at baseline and after 3 months of intervention
assessment via using 2D gait analysis by Kinovea software in order to measure change in cadence (number of steps/minute) and walking speed (meter/minute)
at baseline and after 3 months of intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessing the change in Trunk muscles endurance
Time Frame: at baseline and after 3 months of intervention
Endurance of the trunk muscles will be evaluated using four endurance tests designed to establish the change in isometric trunk muscles endurance including; prone plank test (sec), timed partial curl up test (sec), front abdominal power test (cm) and unilateral supine bridge test (sec). For each trunk endurance measure, the examiner will instruct the child to hold the test position as long as possible prior to all testing. Each position will be tested three times and the average time will be recorded.
at baseline and after 3 months of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed El-Sayed, Assistant lecturer, Horus University in Egypt

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 9, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 17, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 18, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 18, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy, Spastic

Clinical Trials on Selected Physical therapy program

3
Subscribe