Intravenous Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine on the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block

March 26, 2022 updated by: Xi Wu, Huazhong University of Science and Technology

Intravenous Dexamethasone and Dexmedetomidine on the Analgesic Efficacy of Erector Spinae Plane Block for Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery

Patients having lumbar spinal fusion often complain about severe postoperative pain and postoperative rehabilitation process can be affected negatively. Postoperative pain that cannot be well controlled may lead to delayed mobilization, pulmonary and thromboembolic complications, prolonged hospital stays, and chronic pain syndromes. Pain after spinal surgery can arise from several different tissues, such as the vertebrae, disks, ligaments, dura, facet joint, muscle, fascia, and subcutaneous and cutaneous tissues.

Ultrasound-guided lumbar erector spinae plane block (ESPB) has been shown to reduce postoperative pain in patients undergoing posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF). However, the duration of analgesia after single-shot ESPB with commonly used local anesthetics is reported to be no more than 12 h, which often not long enough to provide satisfactory postoperative pain relief, as the pain typically lasts for several days. Compared with perineural route, intravenous additives to local anesthetics are commonly accepted as its safety and efficiency have been reported. Moreover, co-administration of intravenous dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine significantly prolonged the time to first rescue analgesic request after single-shot interscalene brachial plexus block. However, more data are needed especially for lumbar ESPB.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China
        • Union Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18-65 yrs
  2. American Society of Anesthesiologists physical statusⅠ-Ⅲ
  3. Involvement of ≤3 spinal levels
  4. Undergo elective posterior lumbar interbody fusion
  5. Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. A known allergy to the drugs being used
  2. Pre-existing neuropsychiatric disorders or language barrier
  3. Analgesics intake, history of substance abuse
  4. Contraindications to peripheral nerve block
  5. Acute cerebrovascular disease
  6. Severe liver failure
  7. Uncontrolled low blood pressure
  8. Sinus bradycardia or atrioventricular block

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DD group
co-administered intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg and dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg
General anesthesia was induced with sufentanil 0.5-0.8 ug/kg, propofol 1.5-2.0 mg/kg, and rocuronium 0.5-1.0 mg/kg. Intravenous dexamethasone 10 mg was injected and a 50-ml syringe containing dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg in 0.9% saline was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period. Anesthesia was maintained by remifentanil and sevoflurane to keep the Narcotrend index reading between 40 and 60.
The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.
Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.
Placebo Comparator: D group
intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg
The probe was installed in the sagittal axis in the midline at the L3 vertebral level. The spinous processes were first visualized, after which the probe was lateralized, and the transverse processes and the erector spinae muscle were visualized approximately 3 cm laterally to the midline. The needle was advanced between the transverse process and the deep fascia of the erector spinae muscle from the caudal to the cranial using in-plane technique. The location of the needle was confirmed with 2mL saline solution, after which 20 mL of 0.4% ropivacaine was administered.
Intravenous PCA included 0.9% saline with sufentanil and was programmed to run at 2ml with a 1-ml bolus dose and a 10-min lockout time. The patients with VAS more than 4 despite using intravenous PCA were treated with rescue analgesics comprising intravenous parecoxib.
Intravenous dexmedetomidine 1 ug/kg was infused after induction of general anaesthesia over a 30-min period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The cumulative opioid consumption
Time Frame: At 24 postoperative hours
At 24 postoperative hours
The time to first rescue analgesic request
Time Frame: Up to 48 postoperative hrs
Up to 48 postoperative hrs

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: Up to 24 postoperative hrs
Up to 24 postoperative hrs
The pain scores determined by the numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10)
Time Frame: At 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 hrs after the surgery
At 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48 hrs after the surgery
Postoperative hospital length of stay
Time Frame: Up to 3 weeks
Up to 3 weeks
Adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 48 postoperative hrs
Up to 48 postoperative hrs

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 22, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 19, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

February 23, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

Clinical Trials on Dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine

Subscribe