Resistance Training and Clinical Status in Patients With Post Discharge Symptoms After Covid-19 (EXER-COVID)

October 31, 2022 updated by: Universidad Pública de Navarra

Resistance Training Intervention on the Clinical Status in Patients With Post Discharge Symptoms After Covid-19: The "EXER-COVID Study"

COVID-19 survivors commonly exhibit a marked extra-respiratory complication affecting the cardiac (arrhythmias and myocardial injury), renal (acute kidney injury), gastrointestinal, nervous (neuropathy, encephalopathy), endocrine and musculoskeletal (weakness, pain, and fatigue) systems. In this context, several studies have found that resistance training intervention promotes important health-related benefits, including cardiac function, compared to aerobic exercise training. Other exercise adaptations include increased skeletal muscle metabolism function, yet physio/psychological adaptations are known to be limited in COVID-19 survivors. Hence, given that resistance training intervention is implemented in a manner that is tolerable to the individual patient, it may be a potential beneficiary "personalized" rehabilitation treatment for patients with COVID-19 syndrome ambulatory.

The "EXER-COVID Clinical Study" project aims at determining the role of personalized exercise intervention in the treatment of post-COVID-19 syndrome ambulatory patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

100 patients will be recruited and undergo baseline testing, including examination, immune systems, biochemistry markers, ECG, DXA, metabolic/respiratory function, VO2max, muscular fitness, lipidomic/inflammatory/oxidative markers and psychological outcomes.

After baseline testing, participants will be randomly allocated into one group receiving standard of care (control group) or a group performing personalized resistance training intervention two times a week over a period of 6 weeks. The randomization procedure involves a computer-generated block randomization schedule in a ratio of 1:1 stratified by an independent person. Following the 8-week intervention period (with a 1-week washout period), both groups will complete a series of follow-up tests (as baseline testing). A 12-week follow-up experimental day is also planned in order to evaluate physio/psychological changes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Pamplona, Spain, 31001
        • Robinson Ramírez-Vélez, Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • SARS-CoV-2 diagnosed using real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests or positive for SARS-CoV-2 virus antigen >90 days before randomization.
  • Still present a chronic symptomatic phase lasting >90 days since debut of symptoms.
  • Have not been hospitalized.
  • There is no evidence on clinical records of pneumonia or any other organ failure related to SARS-CoV-2.
  • Capable and willing to provide an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Present atrial fibrillation.
  • Diagnosed with acute myocarditis.
  • Health conditions that prevent participating in the exercise intervention
  • Patients who cannot undergo VO2max (e.g. acute heart attack or unstable angina, aortic stenosis, acute endocarditis / pericarditis, uncontrolled high blood pressure, acute thromboembolism, severe heart failure, respiratory failure and uncontrolled acute decompensated diabetes mellitus or low blood sugar).
  • Treatment with IL-6 receptor antagonists (tocilizumab, kevzara) within the last month due to drug interference with the cardiopulmonary exercise adaptations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Exercise
Resistance training
Participants will complete a 2-days-a-week training routine: Resistance training (RT, 50-75% 1RM (one-repetition maximum), 4 sets, 8-12 repetitions, 4 exercises). The warn up include Light Intensity Continuous Training (8-10 min, 65-70% HRR). Progressions will be individualized and consistent with patient tolerance. Sessions will be supervised by Physiotherapists and Graduated in Sports Sciences.
Active Comparator: Standard care
Non-supervised ACSM exercise guidelines
This group will be allocated to standard care and therefore no supervised exercise regimen according to scientific guidelines for general physical activity and return to sport provided by the ACSM guidelines for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Cardiovascular Disease.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Cardiorespiratory fitness
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Measured with an incremental VO2 protocol on exercise bike by COSMED Quark CPET plus OMNIA (COSMED®, Rome, Italy)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Post-COVID manifestations
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Questionnaires that sought information about symptoms related to COVID-19 will be administrate. It is a dichotomous scale (Yes/No), that reflects symptoms, functional limitations, and clinical characteristics (i.e., nausea/vomiting, impaired visual acuity or blurry vision, anosmia, dizziness, depression, chills, weakness, musculoskeletal pain, palpitations/tachycardia, change of appetite, frustration, cognitive involvement, anxiety/irritability, dryness, impaired concentration, and headache)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in Blood samples analysed for markers related to low grade inflammation
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Including ENA-78, GCSF, GM-CSF, GRO, GRO-alpha, I-309, IL-1alpha, IL-1beta, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, IL-7, IL-8, IL-10, IL-12 p40/p70, IL-13, IL-15, IFN-gamma, MCP-1, MCP-2, MCP-3, MCSF, MDC, MIG, MIP-1delta, RANTES, SCF, SDF-1, TARC, TGF-beta1, TNF-alpha, TNF-beta, EGF, IGF-I, Angiogenin, Oncostatin M, Thrombopoietin, VEGF-A, PDGF BB, Leptin in (arbitrary units).
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in pulse wave velocity
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Measuring pulse wave velocity (m/seg) by VaSera VS 2000 (Fukuda Denshi, Japan)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Measuring Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (%) by VaSera VS 2000 (Fukuda Denshi, Japan)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in Energy expenditure
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Measuring by COSMED Q-NRG+ plus OMNIA (COSMED®, Rome, Italy)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in bone mineral density measured with DXA
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Measuring in bone mineral density (g)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in fat mass measured with DXA
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Measuring in fat mass (%)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in lean mass measured with DXA
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Measuring in lean mass (kg)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in Fat max oxidation rate
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Measured with an incremental VO2 protocol on exercise bike by COSMED k-5 plus OMNIA (COSMED®, Rome, Italy)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in Dynamic and isometric strength
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Muscular fitness testing (legs, chest, arms, hip and grip)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in Axial accelerometer-based physical activity monitors
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Free-living physical activity is measured using axial accelerometer-based physical activity monitors (AX3; Axivity, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK)
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in blood samples analysed for markers related to oxidative stress
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Including catalase, glutathione peroxidase, peroxidase, glutathione reductase in arbitrary units.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in serum metabolic profiles
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Utrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC)-time of flight-MS based platforms analyzing methanol and chloroform/methanol serum extracts will be combined with the lipids measurement using an UHPLC-single quadrupole-MS based analysis in arbitrary units. Explained fraction of variance and the goodness of prediction will be calculated.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in creatinine kinase
Time Frame: Baseline
Creatinine kinase levels (units per liter)
Baseline
Changes in total troponins levels (ng/mL)
Time Frame: Baseline
Total troponins levels (ng/mL)
Baseline
Changes in D-dimer
Time Frame: Baseline
D-dimer (ng/mL)
Baseline
Changes in thyroid function parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
T3 and T4 levels (μg/dL)
Baseline
Changes in liver function
Time Frame: Baseline
ALT in (U/L), AST and GGT in (U/L)
Baseline
Changes in renal function
Time Frame: Baseline
Urea (mmol/L), sodium (mmol/L), potassium (mmol/L), chloride (mmol/L), calcium (mmol/L), inorganic phosphorus (mmol/L) and uric acid (mmol/L)
Baseline
Changes in haematology parameters
Time Frame: Baseline
White Blood Cells and Red Blood Cells (cell characterization)
Baseline
Changes in cognitive status
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) will be used as an indicator of cognitive status. Scores range between 0 and 30. A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in visual attention and task switching
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
The Trail Making Test will be used as an indicator of visual scanning, graphomotor speed, and executive function. This test consists of two parts in which the subject is instructed to connect a set of 25 dots as quickly as possible while still maintaining accuracy
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in Quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Two summary scores are reported from the EuroQOL EQ-5D instrument
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in psychological stress
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
The 1 Item Statistics Canada Stress Question (SCSQ) will be used. The SCSQ is a 1-item question with a possible scoring of 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more stress.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in physical health symptomology
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
A Physical Health item will be used in the baseline. The scoring range is 0-13, with higher numbers indicating experiencing more negative physical health symptoms.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in psychological distress
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
The 10 Item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale will be used. Scores range from 10-50, with higher scores indicating more symptoms or more frequent experience of those symptoms.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in depressive symptomology
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
The 10 Item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) will be used in the baseline survey, and will be in each weekly survey to track changes in the CES-D over the study period. The possible range in scores is 0 to 30 depending on number of symptoms, with those symptoms weighted by frequency experienced in a week. Higher scores indicating more or more frequent symptoms.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in life satisfaction
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
A Life Satisfaction item, consisting of three questions, will be used (scored 0-10). Higher scores indicate "the best possible life overall". In addition, 2-follow-up questions asking individuals to rate their physical and mental/emotional health on a five point scale from poor to excellent. Higher scores overall indicate more satisfaction with life.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in resilience
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
The Brief Resilience Scale will be used (scores from 1-5). Higher scores indicate the individual perceives they have a better ability to 'bounce back' and recover from stressful events and/or situations.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Change in pain score using numeric 0-10 rating scale
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
The numeric rating scale is 0-10 where 0 is no pain, 5 is moderate pain and 10 is the worst pain
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Tracking the amount of exercise variety participants feel they engage in
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Using the Perceived Variety in Exercise questionnaire. There are 5 items asking about exercise variety, scored 1 (false) to 6 (true), with a possible score of 5-30; higher scores indicate greater perceived variety.
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Changes in physical activity levels
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Metabolic Equivalents (METs) throughout a week, including activity for work, during transport and leisure time, using the self-reported general physical activity questionnaire (GPAQ).
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
Including Changes in mononuclear cells of peripheral blood (sub-sample 40 participants)
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks
CD4, CD8, PD1, CD62L, LKRG1, CD28, CD57, CD163, CD119, CD56, CD116, CD66b, CD11b, and CD14 by flow cytometry
Baseline, 6 Weeks and 12 Weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Mikel Izquierdo, Ph.D, Universidad Pública de Navarra

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 18, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 31, 2022

Last Verified

July 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Covid19

Clinical Trials on Resistance training

3
Subscribe