Effect of the Sheath of Rectus Abdominis Block Combined With the Transverse Plane

April 14, 2021 updated by: Zhangyi, Tongji Hospital

Effect of the Sheath of Rectus Abdominis Block Combined With the Transverse Plane Block on the Condition in Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery.

The situation of demand for surgical conditions is quite high when lymph node resection involved in the surgery type, especially abdominal aortic lymph node dissection, and commonly, the surgeons complained about the interference from the intestine which pushed the investigators to increase the level of neuromuscular blockade close to deep NMB. To avoid the application of deep NMB and promote good surgical conditions for laparoscopic gynecological surgery with lymph nodes resection, the investigators explored other preoperative ways to cooperate with surgeons more harmoniously. It's well known that epidural anesthesia and epidural anesthesia combined with spinal anesthesia have the effect of muscle relaxation which has been applied in clinical practice widely. One study indicated that the Transverse Abdominal Plane (TAP) block could change muscle thickness and achieve the effect of muscle relaxation. It leads investigators to a hypothesis that the sheath of rectus abdominis block combined with transverse abdominal plane block may suppress the signal transmission of abdominal nerve, and may be beneficial to improve surgical conditions.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The investigators conducted this study to test the hypothesis that compared with moderate NMB, the sheath of rectus abdominis block combined with transverse abdominal plane block may reduce the frequency of additional ask for muscle relaxants to optimize surgical conditions, and also provide postoperative analgesia on the premise of moderate NMB.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 55 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. ASA grade I~ II;
  2. aged 18-55 years;
  3. BMI 19 ~ 23kg/m2;
  4. laparoscopic total hysterectomy and bilateral adnexectomy and/or pelvic lymphadenectomy under elective general anesthesia lasted for more than 2 hours; 5. informed consent has been signed.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. the patient had a history of abdominal surgery;
  2. For patients who are professional athletes and weight trainers, abdominal muscle tension can be changed through strength training need to be excluded.
  3. allergic to any of the drugs used in the experiment;
  4. pregnant or lactating women;
  5. patients with severe mental and neurological symptoms cannot cooperate with the study;
  6. those who participated in other clinical trials within 3 months before being enrolled in the study;
  7. the researcher believes that other reasons are not suitable for clinical trials;
  8. patients who have changed their surgical methods or received only palliative surgical treatment;
  9. patients with abnormal coagulation function;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: the group of abdominal nerve block combined with moderate NMB
The patients of group N-M received the rectus abdominis block combined with transverse plane block.
All Patients of group A-M will be administered with rectus abdominis block combined with TAPB after anesthesia. Rocuronium was infused continuously (concentration: 1 mg/ml) when TOF recovered to 1. The starting rate was 0.3mg/kg/h, and the TOF count was maintained between 1~3 (moderate NMB) and recorded during the operation. Whether and how to add rocuronium was based on TOF count and request of surgeons. When TOF Watch- SX showed 4 or ratio, the investigators increased the speed of rocuronium pump infusion and record the score at the time of shallow NMB. When the chief surgeon thought the vision could not satisfy the needs of the operation, rocuronium 0.1mg/kg in bolus was added as a rescue. Then, the pump speed was lowered or even decreased to 0 to make the TOF count recover to 1~3 as soon as possible.
Other Names:
  • moderate NMB monitorted by the TOF Watch- SX
  • Rocuronium
  • 40 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine
No Intervention: moderate NMB group
The patients of group M received moderate NMB through the surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the good or optimal percentage of each group based on the surgical rating scale (5-point scale)
Time Frame: The field of vision was assessed every 15 minutes, from the beginning of the pneumoperitoneum to the end of the pneumoperitoneum. The surgeon gave a score, and the field of vision grade was determined based on the mean value.
The primary outcome was the frequency of the good or optimal rating scale based on a five-point surgical rating scale (SRS) ranging from 1 (extremely poor conditions) to 5 (optimal conditions).
The field of vision was assessed every 15 minutes, from the beginning of the pneumoperitoneum to the end of the pneumoperitoneum. The surgeon gave a score, and the field of vision grade was determined based on the mean value.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 31, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 10, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Nerve Block

Clinical Trials on abdominal nerve block

Subscribe