Efficacy Of M-TAPA and TAP Block Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

April 20, 2024 updated by: Mursel Ekinci

Comparison Of Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach and Transversus Abdominal Plane Block in Analgesia Efficacy And Recovery Quality Following Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Cholecystectomy is the most common abdominal surgical procedure in developed countries Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard surgical technique for gallstones.

The analgesic effectiveness of TAP block has been demonstrated after laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations. m-TAPA block has been described as an alternative analgesic technique in abdominal surgeries.

The aim of this study is to compare these two analgesic methods in terms of effectiveness for postoperative analgesia management after laparoscopic cholecystectomy operations.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cholecystectomy is the most common abdominal surgical procedure in developed countries Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the gold standard surgical technique for gallstones.

Several factors play a role in pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This pain is complex and generally considered to be visceral. These factors are include phrenic nerve irritation caused by CO2 insufflation, abdominal distension, port incisions, the effect of gallbladder removal and individual factors.

Regional analgesia has been widely accepted by both patients and treating physicians and has become an important part of multimodal analgesia techniques. Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block has been shown to reduce postoperative pain like hysterectomy, cholecystectomy, cesarean section and colorectal surgery.

Ultrasound (US)-guided Modified Thoracoabdominal Nerve Block Through Perichondrial Approach (M-TAPA) is performed by applying local anesthetic only to the underside of the perichondral surface. It provides effective analgesia in the anterior and lateral thoracoabdominal area.

M-TAPA is a good alternative for analgesia of the upper dermatome levels and lateral abdominal region and may be an opioid-sparing strategy that provides better quality recovery in patients undergoing laporoscopic surgery. M-TAPA provides analgesia at the T5-T11 level in the abdomen. Sonoanatomy is easy to visualize and the spread of local anesthetic can be easily seen with US guidance. Cephalo caudal spread of local anesthetic solution produces analgesia in several dermatomes. There are studies investigating the efficacy of M-TAPA for postoperative pain management in bariatric surgery in the literature.

Global recovery score (QoR) 15 is a sensitive, reliable and easy method to measure postoperative recovery quality. This scale, which has become a promising tool for assessing the quality of the recovery period, questions various aspects of recovery in 5 different areas: pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support and emotional state. It may be an important scale to evaluate the outcome of changes in healthcare for quality assurance purposes in perioperative clinical studies. For these reasons, the "Standardized Endpoints in Perioperative Medicine" initiative and the European Society of Anesthesia have recommended the use of the QoR-15 scale in clinical studies investigating patient comfort and pain levels after surgery.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of US-guided M-TAPA block and TAP for postoperative analgesia management after cholecystectomy. The primary outcome is to compare global recovery scores, the secondary outcome is to compare postoperative pain scores (NRS), to evaluate postoperative rescue analgesic (opioid) use and side effects (allergic reaction, nausea, vomiting) associated with opioid use in this study.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I-II
  • Elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Bleeding diathesis
  • Anticoagulant treatment
  • Local anesthetics and opioid allergy
  • Infection at the site of block
  • Patients who do not accept the procedure

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group M-TAPA (Modified Perichondral Approach Thoracoabdominal Nerve block group)
Patients will be performed to block at the end of the surgery. Patients will be administered paracetamol 1 gr (PERFALGAN® ) IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period.. If the patient's NRS score is ≥ 4 0,5 mg/kg IV meperidine (Aldolan ampul 100 mg/2 ml) will be administered.
M-TAPA block will be performed to Group M-TAPA at the end of the surgery, using US (Vivid Q) while the patient is in the supine position After providing aseptic conditions, the high frequency linear US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be covered with a sterile sheath, and an 80 mm block needle (Braun 360°) will be used. The US probe will be placed in the sagittal plane where the midclavicular line intersects with the costal cartilage corresponding to the costochondral angle. Using the In Plane technique, the probe is gently pushed to visualize the lower part of the costochondral angle at the central level, advancing the block needle in the caudal-cranio direction, 5 ml of saline will be injected into the layer between the transverse abdominal muscle and the lower plane of the costal cartilage, and the block location will be confirmed. After the block location is confirmed, a total of 20 ml + 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (total 40 ml for both sides) will be injected bilaterally
Other Names:
  • Postoperative analgesia management
Active Comparator: Group TAP (Transversus Abdominal Plane block group)
Patients will be performed to block at the end of the surgery. Patients will be administered paracetamol 1 gr (PERFALGAN® ) IV every 8 hours in the postoperative period.. If the patient's NRS score is ≥ 4 0,5 mg/kg IV meperidine (Aldolan ampul 100 mg/2 ml) will be administered.
TAP block will be performed to Group TAP at the end of the surgery, using US (Vivid Q) while the patient is in the supine position. After providing aseptic conditions, the high frequency linear US probe (11-12 MHz, Vivid Q) will be covered with a sterile sheath, and an 80 mm block needle (Braun 360°) will be used. USG will be placed transversely on the mid-axillary line between the iliac crest and subcostal planes. Using the In Plane technique, the block needle will be advanced into the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles and the location will be confirmed by administering 5 ml of saline. The block needle will be advanced into the fascial plane between the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles and the location will be confirmed by administering 5 ml of saline.and than 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine (total 40 ml for both sides) will be injected bilaterally
Other Names:
  • Postoperative analgesia management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Global recovery scoring system (patient satisfaction scale)
Time Frame: The quality of recovery will be evaluated out of a total of 150 points according to the QoR-15 test to be applied at the portoperative 24th hour.

The investigators will use the Turkish version of Quality of Recovery / QoR-15 questionairre

PART A How have you been feeling in the last 24 hours? (0 to 10, where: 0 = none of the time [poor] and 10 = all of the time [excellent])

  1. Able to breathe easily
  2. Been able to enjoy food
  3. Feeling rested
  4. Have had a good sleep
  5. Able to look after personal toilet and hygiene unaided
  6. Able to communicate with
  7. Getting support from hospital doctors and nurses
  8. Able to return to work or usual home activities
  9. Feeling comfortable and in control
  10. Having a feeling of general well-being

    PART B Have you had any of the following in the last 24 hours? (10 to 0, where: 10 = none of the time [excellent] and 0 = all of the time [poor])

  11. Moderate pain
  12. Severe pain
  13. Nausea or vomiting
  14. Feeling worried or anxious
  15. Feeling sad or depressed
The quality of recovery will be evaluated out of a total of 150 points according to the QoR-15 test to be applied at the portoperative 24th hour.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain scores (Numerical rating scale) (0-meaning "no pain" to 10-meaning "worst pain imaginable")
Time Frame: Patients will be evaluated at the first 24 hours period postoperatively.
Postoperative 24 hours period. Patients' pain scores will be questioned at 0, 2, 4, 8, 16 and 24 hours.
Patients will be evaluated at the first 24 hours period postoperatively.
The use of rescue analgesia
Time Frame: Meperidine consumption will be recorded at the first 24 hours period postoperatively.(total mg dose)
The need for rescue analgesia will be recorded at the first 24 hours period postoperatively.
Meperidine consumption will be recorded at the first 24 hours period postoperatively.(total mg dose)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 20, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 10, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 10, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2024

Last Verified

April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cholecystitis

Clinical Trials on Modified Perichondral Approach Thoracoabdominal Nerve block

3
Subscribe