MP1032 Treatment in Patients With Moderate to Severe COVID-19

June 12, 2023 updated by: MetrioPharm AG

A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Proof-of-concept, Phase IIA Study of MP1032 Plus Standard of Care vs Standard of Care in the Treatment of Hospitalized Participants With Moderate to Severe COVID-19

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MP1032 with standard of care (SoC) verses placebo with SoC in hospitalized adults participants with moderate to severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

132

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Blagoevgrad, Bulgaria
        • MHAT Blagoevgrad AD
      • Kozloduy, Bulgaria
        • MHAT Sv. Ivan Rilski Kozloduy
      • Montana, Bulgaria
        • Mhat Dr. Stamen Iliev Ad
      • Pernik, Bulgaria
        • SHATPD Pernik EOOD
      • Sliven, Bulgaria
        • MHAT Dr. Ivan Seliminski AD
      • Sofia, Bulgaria
        • Umhatem"N.I.Pirogov"
      • Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
        • SHATPPD Sata Zagora EOOD
      • Argenteuil, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Victor Dupouy
      • Grenoble Cedex 9, France
        • CHU de Grenoble Alpes
      • Pierre-Benite CEDEX, France
        • Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud
      • Debrecen, Hungary
        • DE KK Infektológiai Klinika
      • Kistarcsa, Hungary
        • Flor Ferenc Hospital of Pest County
      • Forlì, Italy
        • Ospedale GB Morgagni
      • Latina, Italy
        • Ospedale SM Goretti
      • Milan, Italy
        • ASST-FBF-SACCO - Ospedale Luigi Sacco
      • Milano, Italy
        • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele
      • Napoli, Italy
        • Policlinico di Napoli
      • Pescara, Italy
        • Ospedale "Santo Spirito! Pescara
      • Roma, Italy
        • Policlinico Agostino Gemelli
      • Bucharest, Romania
        • Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infectioase si Tropicale "Dr. Victor Babes"
      • Caracal, Romania
        • Spitalul Municipal Caracal
      • Iaşi, Romania
        • Spitalul Clinic de Boli Infectioase "Sfanta Parascheva"
      • Timişoara, Romania
        • Clinica Anestezie si Terapie Intensiva
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona Hospital Clinic i Provincial
      • Madrid, Spain
        • Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Edificio Central
      • Salamanca, Spain
        • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Salamanca
      • Santander, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla/IDIVAL
      • Sevilla, Spain
        • Hospital Universitario de Valme
      • Vigo, Spain
        • Hospital Alvaro Cunqueiro
    • Idaho
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States, 83404
        • Snake River Research PLLC
    • New York
      • Staten Island, New York, United States, 10310
        • Richmond University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant is admitted to hospital and has a positive severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) test by standard reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay or equivalent test
  • Participant has the presence of any symptom(s) suggestive of moderate or severe systemic illness with COVID-19

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant, in opinion of the investigator, is not likely to survive >=48 hours beyond Day 1
  • Participant has a diagnosis of asymptomatic COVID-19, mild COVID-19, or critical COVID-19 on Day 1
  • Participant has a documented medical history of infection with hepatitis A, B, C, or with human immunodeficiency virus (with a detectable viral load and CD4 count <500 cells per micro liter), or a documented active infection with tuberculosis.
  • The Participant has clinically significant electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities at screening

Other protocol defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: MP1032
Participants will receive MP1032 300 milligrams (mg) twice daily (BID) with hospital selected SoC for 28 days.
Hard gelatin capsules for oral administration.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive placebo matched to MP1032 with hospital selected SoC for 28 days.
Placebo capsules matched to MP1032 for oral administration.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Using National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) 8-point Ordinal Scale at Day 14
Time Frame: At Day 14
Disease progression was defined as the percentage of participants who were not alive or who had respiratory failure. Respiratory failure was defined as participants who had a score of 2, 3 or 4 on the NIAID 8-point ordinal scale: The NIAID scale is an assessment of clinical status on a given study day and was defined as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The total score range was 1 to 8 where, higher score indicates improvement in the clinical status.
At Day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Disease Progression Using NIAID 8-point Ordinal Scale at Day 28
Time Frame: At Day 28
Disease progression was defined as the percentage of participants who were not alive or who had respiratory failure. Respiratory failure was defined as participants who had a score of 2, 3 or 4 on the NIAID 8-point ordinal scale: The NIAID scale is an assessment of clinical status on a given study day and was defined as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The total score range was 1 to 8 where, higher score indicates improvement in the clinical status.
At Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Disease Resolution at Day 28
Time Frame: At Day 28
Disease resolution was defined as participants who were alive and had a score of 6, 7, or 8 on the NIAID 8-point ordinal scale. The NIAID scale is an assessment of clinical status on a given study day and was defined as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The total score range was 1 to 8 where, higher score indicates improvement in the clinical status.
At Day 28
All-cause Mortality Rate up to Day 28
Time Frame: Up to Day 28
All-cause mortality rate was the percentage of participants in each treatment group who died by Day 28 were reported.
Up to Day 28
Change From Baseline in Clinical Status Score Related to COVID-19 According to the NIAID 8-point Ordinal Scale at Day 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 28
The NIAID 8-point Ordinal Scale is an assessment of the clinical status on a given study day and the scale was defined as follows: 1=Death, 2=Hospitalized, on invasive ventilation (mechanical ventilator and/or ECMO), 3=Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen devices, 4=Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen, 5=Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen, but requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise), 6=Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen and no longer requires ongoing medical care (used if hospitalization was extended for infection-control reasons), 7=Not hospitalized, limitation on activities, and/or requiring home oxygen, 8=Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The total score range was 1 to 8 where, higher score indicates improvement in the clinical status.
Baseline, Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Disease Resolution at Day 14
Time Frame: At Day 14
Disease resolution was defined as participants who were alive and had a score of 6, 7, or 8 on the NIAID 8-point ordinal scale. The NIAID scale is an assessment of clinical status on a given study day and was defined as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The total score range was 1 to 8 where, higher score indicates improvement in the clinical status.
At Day 14
All-cause Mortality Rate up to Day 14 and Day 60
Time Frame: Up to Day 14 and Day 60
The percentage of participants who died by Day 14 and Day 60 were reported.
Up to Day 14 and Day 60
Change From Baseline in Clinical Status Score Related to COVID-19 According to the NIAID 8-point Ordinal Scale at Day 14
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14
The NIAID scale is an assessment of clinical status on a given study day and was defined as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The total score range was 1 to 8 where, higher score indicates improvement in the clinical status. The change from baseline in NIAID clinical status score related to COVID-19 at Day 14 were reported.
Baseline, Day 14
Percentage of Participants Who Required Invasive Ventilation (Mechanical Ventilator and/ ECMO), or Who Died at Day 14 and Day 28
Time Frame: At Day 14 and Day 28
Percentage of participants who required invasive mechanical ventilation/ECMO or who died by Day 14 and Day 28 were reported.
At Day 14 and Day 28
Change From Baseline in Clinical Status Score of the NIAID 8-point Ordinal Scale at Each Visit
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 60
The NIAID scale is an assessment of clinical status on a given study day and was defined as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. The total score range was 1 to 8 where, higher score indicates improvement in the clinical status. The change from baseline in NIAID clinical status score at each visit were reported.
Baseline up to Day 60
Time to (First) Improvement of at Least 1 Category on the NIAID 8-point Ordinal Scale
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 28
The NIAID scale is an assessment of clinical status on a given study day and was defined as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Participants who did not improve at least 1 category on the NIAID scale or died before Day 28 were censored at Day 28. The total score range was 1 to 8 where, higher score indicates improvement in the clinical status.
Baseline up to Day 28
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Status Improvement of at Least 1 Category From Baseline on the NIAID 8-point Ordinal Scale at Day 14 and Day 28
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 14 and Day 28
NIAID scale is an assessment of clinical status on a given study day and was defined as follows: 1) Death; 2) Hospitalized, on invasive mechanical ventilation or ECMO; 3) Hospitalized, on non-invasive ventilation or high flow oxygen devices; 4) Hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - requiring ongoing medical care (COVID-19 related or otherwise); 6) Hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen - no longer requires ongoing medical care; 7) Not hospitalized, limitation on activities and/or requiring home oxygen; 8) Not hospitalized, no limitations on activities. Higher score = improvement in clinical status. Percentage of Participants with Clinical Status Improvement of at least 1 category from baseline on the NIAID 8-point Ordinal Scale at Day 14 and Day 28 were reported.
Baseline, Day 14 and Day 28
Time to Discharge by Day 28 and Day 60
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 28 and Day 60
Time to discharge i.e., the total duration of participant hospitalization from baseline to discharge at Day 28 and Day 60 was reported.
Baseline, Day 28 and Day 60
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Tested Negative for COVID-19 at Day 14, Day 28, and Day 60
Time Frame: At Day 14, Day 28 and Day 60
Percentage of participants who were alive and tested negative for COVID-19 at Day 14, Day 28, and Day 60 were reported.
At Day 14, Day 28 and Day 60
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious TEAEs
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Day 60
An Adverse Event (AE) was any symptom, physical sign, syndrome, or disease that either emerges during the study or, if present at screening, worsens during the study, regardless of the suspected cause of the event. TEAE was defined as any adverse event which starts or worsens at any time after initiation of study drug until the end of the follow-up period at Day 60. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose met one, more of the following criteria: results in death, life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent, significant disability/incapacity, a congenital abnormality/birth defect, an important medical event. Number of participants with TEAEs and Serious TEAEs were reported.
Day 1 up to Day 60
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Change in Vital Sign
Time Frame: Day 1 up to Day 60
Vital sign parameters included of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, oxygen saturation (SpO2), and body temperature. Any clinically significant change in vital signs were judged by the investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant change in vital sign values were reported.
Day 1 up to Day 60
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examinations
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 60
Physical examination included examination of respiratory, cardiovascular, dermatological, neurological, and gastrointestinal system. Any clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination were judged by the investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in physical examinations findings were reported.
Baseline up to Day 60
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Clinical Laboratory Results
Time Frame: Baseline up to Day 60
Clinical laboratory tests included biochemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Any clinically significant abnormalities in clinical laboratory results were judged by the investigator. Number of participants with clinically significant abnormalities in laboratory results were reported.
Baseline up to Day 60
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of MP1032
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 7
Cmax of MP1032 in plasma were reported. Geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation percent (CV%) was reported.
Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 7
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to Last Non-zero Concentration (AUC0-t) of MP1032
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 7
AUC0-t of MP1032 in plasma were reported. Geometric mean and geometric coefficient of variation percent (CV%) was reported.
Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 7
Apparent Elimination Rate Constant (Kel) of MP1032
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1
Kel was calculated using negative of the estimated slope of the linear regression of the ln-transformed plasma concentration versus time profile in the terminal elimination phase. Kel of MP1032 in plasma were reported.
Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1
Apparent Body Clearance (CL/F) of MP1032
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1
Cl/F was estimated as Dose/AUC0-inf. CL/F of MP1032 in plasma was reported.
Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of MP1032
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1
Vz/F was estimated as Dose/(Kel x AUC0-inf). Vz/F of MP1032 in plasma was reported.
Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1
Plasma Concentration Prior to the Next Dose (Ctrough) of MP1032
Time Frame: Pre-dose concentration (Day 2, Day 7, and Day 8).
Ctrough of MP1032 in plasma was reported.
Pre-dose concentration (Day 2, Day 7, and Day 8).
Average Observed Plasma Concentration at Steady State of MP1032
Time Frame: Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 7
Average observed plasma concentration at steady state of MP1032 was reported.
Pre-dose, 0.16, 0.33, 0.5, 1, 2, 8 and 24 hours post-dose at Day 1 and Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 19, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 28, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 5, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 18, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 21, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 29, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on MP1032

3
Subscribe