A Study Assessing Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter (OPTIMUM)

Clinical Evaluation of Arrhythmia Mapping With the Multi-Electrode OPTRELL™ Mapping Catheter

The purpose of this study is to assess the performance and safety for the use of the OPTRELL Catheter for intracardiac mapping in the atria and ventricles.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Tachycardia, Ventricular; Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation; Persistent Atrial Fibrillation; Ventricular Premature Complexes; Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: OPTRELL Mapping Catheter

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 31
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Belgium
  • Antwerpen, Belgium, 2650
    • UZ Antwerpen
  • Hasselt, Belgium, 3500
    • Virga Jessa Ziekenhuis
• Lithuania
  • Vilnius, Lithuania, 8661
    • Vilnius University Hospital Santaros Clinics

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosed with and candidate for clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation procedure for the management of ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation (participant having undergone a previous ablation procedure may be included)
• At least one episode of the targeted arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia, atrial tachycardia or atrial fibrillation) must have been documented by electrocardiogram (ECG), Holter, loop recorder, telemetry, implanted device, or transtelephonic monitoring within 12 months of enrollment
• Signed Participant Informed Consent Form (ICF).
• Able and willing to comply with all pre-, post-, and follow-up testing and requirements

Exclusion Criteria:

• Diagnosed with an arrhythmia requiring epicardial mapping
• Study arrhythmia secondary to reversible cause, or secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or non-cardiac cause
• Atrial arrhythmias: participants with a left atrial size greater than (>) 55 millimeters (mm)
• Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) less than or equal to (<=) 25 percent (%) for Ventricular Tachycardia (VT) participants
• LVEF <= 40% for participants with atrial arrhythmia
• Documented intracardiac thrombus as detected on imaging
• Contraindication to anticoagulation (that is heparin, warfarin, dabigatran)
• History of blood clotting or bleeding abnormalities (example hypercoagulable state)
• Myocardial infarction within the past 2 months (60 days)
• Documented thromboembolic event (including Transient Ischemic Attack [TIA]) within the past 12 months (365 days)
• Uncontrolled heart failure or New York Heart Association (NYHA) function class IV
• Implanted with a pacemaker or intracardiac cardiac defibrillator within the past 6 weeks (42 days)
• Implanted with a prosthetic valve
• Active illness or active systemic infection or sepsis
• Diagnosed atrial or ventricular myxoma, interatrial baffle or patch, tumor or other abnormality that precludes catheter introduction or manipulation
• Significant congenital anomaly or medical problem that in the opinion of the investigator would preclude enrollment in this study
• Participants that have ever undergone a percutaneous or surgical valvular cardiac procedure (that is, ventriculotomy, atriotomy, and valve repair or replacement and presence of a prosthetic valve)
• Any cardiac surgery within the past 60 days (2 months) (includes Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI])
• Atrial septal closure within the past 6 weeks (42 days)
• Presence of a condition that precludes vascular access
• Women who are pregnant (as evidenced by pregnancy test if pre-menopausal), lactating, or who are of childbearing age and plan on becoming pregnant during the course of the clinical investigation
• Categorized as vulnerable population and requires special treatment with respect to safeguards of well-being
• Concurrent enrollment in an investigational study evaluating another device or drug

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Other
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: OPTRELL Mapping Catheter; Participants diagnosed with cardiac arrhythmias who are scheduled to have a clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation procedure of arrhythmia management for Atrial and ventricular procedures will be using multi-electrode OPTRELL mapping catheter.	Device: OPTRELL Mapping Catheter; Participants scheduled to have a clinically-indicated catheter mapping and ablation using OPTRELL mapping catheter for the management of Atrial procedure (Scar-related Atrial Tachycardia, Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation) and Ventricular procedures (Ventricular Tachycardia, Premature Ventricular Complex).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Related to the OPTRELL Catheter	Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure related to the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An adverse event (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.	Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of Participants With Pre-ablation Mapping and Clinically Indicated Mapping Performed With the OPTRELL Catheter Without Resort to Other Mapping Catheters	Number of participants with pre-ablation mapping and clinically indicated mapping performed with the OPTRELL catheter without resort to other mapping catheters were reported.	Up to 72 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Participants With SAEs Within 7 Days of Index Procedure	Number of participants with SAEs within 7 days of index procedure were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant whether or not related to the investigational device. SAE is any AE that results in: death, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, is life-threatening experience, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect and may jeopardize participant and/or may require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above.	Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of Participants With Non-serious Adverse Events Within 7 Days of Index Procedure Associated With the Use of the OPTRELL Catheter	Number of participants with non-serious adverse events within 7 days of index procedure associated with the use of the OPTRELL catheter were reported. An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant participating in a clinical study that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the pharmaceutical/biological agent under study.	Up to 7 days of index procedure at Day 0
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Maneuverability & Handling	Number of responders for physician assessment for maneuverability & handling were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for maneuverability & handling.	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Signal Collection and Quality	Number of responders for physician assessment for signal collection and quality were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for signal collection and quality	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Pacing	Number of responders for physician assessment for pacing (local pacing capture) were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for pacing.	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Design in OPTRELL Catheter for Mapping	Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter design were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter design in OPTRELL catheter for mapping.	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Workflow	Number of responders for physician assessment for workflow were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for workflow.	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheter Visualization	Number of responders for physician assessment for catheter visualization were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheter visualization.	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Catheters Interactions	Number of responders for physician assessment for catheters interactions were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for catheters interactions.	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Arrhythmogenicity	Number of responders with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for arrhythmogenicity.	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Design and Coverage for Confirming PVI	Number of responders for physician assessment for design and coverage for confirming PVI were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for design and coverage for confirming PVI.	Up to 72 days
Number of Responders for Physician Assessment for Ability to Characterize the Tissue	Number of responders for physician assessment for ability to characterize the tissue were reported. A post-procedure survey of 11 questions, each with individual sub-questions were asked. Each question/sub-question was answered by the physician using a Likert scale of 1 to 7 (1=poor and 7=excellent). Responders refers to participants with physician assessment for ability to characterize the tissue.	Up to 72 days

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Biosense Webster, Inc.

Publications and helpful links

General Publications

• Cappato R, Calkins H, Chen SA, Davies W, Iesaka Y, Kalman J, Kim YH, Klein G, Natale A, Packer D, Skanes A, Ambrogi F, Biganzoli E. Updated worldwide survey on the methods, efficacy, and safety of catheter ablation for human atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010 Feb;3(1):32-8. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.859116. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
• Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, Chen PS, Chen SA, Chung MK, Nielsen JC, Curtis AB, Davies DW, Day JD, d'Avila A, de Groot NMSN, Di Biase L, Duytschaever M, Edgerton JR, Ellenbogen KA, Ellinor PT, Ernst S, Fenelon G, Gerstenfeld EP, Haines DE, Haissaguerre M, Helm RH, Hylek E, Jackman WM, Jalife J, Kalman JM, Kautzner J, Kottkamp H, Kuck KH, Kumagai K, Lee R, Lewalter T, Lindsay BD, Macle L, Mansour M, Marchlinski FE, Michaud GF, Nakagawa H, Natale A, Nattel S, Okumura K, Packer D, Pokushalov E, Reynolds MR, Sanders P, Scanavacca M, Schilling R, Tondo C, Tsao HM, Verma A, Wilber DJ, Yamane T. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary. J Arrhythm. 2017 Oct;33(5):369-409. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2017.08.001. Epub 2017 Sep 15. No abstract available.
• Lin, A.C. and D.J. Wilber, Complications Associated With Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation, in Radiofrequency catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias: basic concepts and clinical applications, S.K. Huang and D.J. Wilber, Editors. 2000, Futura: Armonk, N.Y. p. 737-746.
• Mar PL, Chong L, Perez A, Lakkireddy D, Gopinathannair R. Entrapment of diagnostic catheter within Advisor HD grid mapping catheter. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021 Mar;32(3):860-861. doi: 10.1111/jce.14893. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
• Bick RL, Frenkel EP. Clinical aspects of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and thrombosis and other side effects of heparin therapy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 1999 Oct;5 Suppl 1:S7-15. doi: 10.1177/10760296990050s103.
• Cox B, Durieux ME, Marcus MA. Toxicity of local anaesthetics. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2003 Mar;17(1):111-36. doi: 10.1053/bean.2003.0275.
• Gruchalla RS. 10. Drug allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003 Feb;111(2 Suppl):S548-59. doi: 10.1067/mai.2003.93.
• Mertes PM, Laxenaire MC. Allergic reactions occurring during anaesthesia. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Apr;19(4):240-62. doi: 10.1017/s0265021502000418.
• Morcos SK, Thomsen HS, Webb JA; Contrast Media Safety Committee of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology. Prevention of generalized reactions to contrast media: a consensus report and guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2001;11(9):1720-8. doi: 10.1007/s003300000778.
• Scheinman MM, Huang S. The 1998 NASPE prospective catheter ablation registry. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2000 Jun;23(6):1020-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2000.tb00891.x.
• Gerstenfeld EP, Guerra P, Sparks PB, Hattori K, Lesh MD. Clinical outcome after radiofrequency catheter ablation of focal atrial fibrillation triggers. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2001 Aug;12(8):900-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1540-8167.2001.00900.x.
• Kovoor P, Ricciardello M, Collins L, Uther JB, Ross DL. Risk to patients from radiation associated with radiofrequency ablation for supraventricular tachycardia. Circulation. 1998 Oct 13;98(15):1534-40. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.98.15.1534.
• Nahass GT. Fluoroscopy and the skin: implications for radiofrequency catheter ablation. Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jul 15;76(3):174-6. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80053-8. No abstract available.
• Calkins H, Niklason L, Sousa J, el-Atassi R, Langberg J, Morady F. Radiation exposure during radiofrequency catheter ablation of accessory atrioventricular connections. Circulation. 1991 Dec;84(6):2376-82. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.84.6.2376.

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 25, 2021
• Primary Completion (Actual): November 4, 2021
• Study Completion (Actual): November 4, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: July 22, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: July 22, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): July 30, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): July 3, 2023
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: June 28, 2023
• Last Verified: June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Pathologic Processes; Heart Diseases; Cardiovascular Diseases; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cardiac Conduction System Disease; Cardiac Complexes, Premature; Atrial Fibrillation; Tachycardia; Tachycardia, Ventricular; Ventricular Premature Complexes
• Other Study ID Numbers: BWI_2019_02 (Other Identifier: Biosense Webster, Inc.); CIV-BE-21-04-036524 (Other Identifier: EUDAMED CIV-ID)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. has an agreement with the Yale Open Data Access (YODA) Project to serve as the independent review panel for evaluation of requests for clinical study reports and participant level data from investigators and physicians for scientific research that will advance medical knowledge and public health. Requests for access to the study data can be submitted through the YODA Project site at http://yoda.yale.edu.

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: Yes