Use of SPY Fluorescent Angiography to Reduce Ureteroenteric Stricture Rate Following Urinary Diversion

August 23, 2021 updated by: Tracey Krupski, MD, University of Virginia

Ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication of urinary diversion which occurs in 4-25% of patients. Recent study has yielded that radiation is a significant risk factor for development of ureteroenteric stricture. The goal of this study is to determine whether intraoperative use of SPY fluorescent angiography during urinary diversion reduces rate of ureteroenteric stricture.

This study will include 215 patients who have undergone urinary diversion over the past 5 years as historic controls and compare ureteroenteric stricture rates to a prospective cohort of patients in whom intraoperative SPY fluorescent angiography was used at the time of urinary diversion to assess the anastomotic perfusion. This will include injection of ICG intravenously as well as utilization of the SPY device to assess ureteral perfusion before and after ureteroenteric anastomosis. Based on power analysis, this study will require approximately 50 patients in our prospective group to detect a clinically significant difference of 5% between groups. Data analysis plan includes the use of chi square test for comparison of stricture rates between groups. Clinical outcomes will be followed prospectively, with no amendment to standard follow-up per physician.

Study Overview

Status

Enrolling by invitation

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Ureteroenteric anastomotic stricture is a well-known complication of urinary diversion which occurs in 4-25% of patients. Strictures present clinically with flank pain, decreased renal function, pyelonephritis or may be asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally with progressive hydronephrosis and renal impairment. Strictures are a cause of significant morbidity and health care expenditure, as treatment necessitates procedural intervention and often several inpatient admissions. Numerous studies have sought to identify risk factors for development of ureteroenteric strictures as well as opportunities for technical approaches to reduce stricture risk. Studies have demonstrated that Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3 complication and BMI were associated with higher risk of stricture.

Ischemia of the anastomosis related to the tenuous ureteral blood supply is implicated in the formation of ureteroenteric stricture. Basic science and animal data have established the detrimental impact of radiation therapy on microvasculature. Radiation induced ureteral ischemia in conjunction with periureteral fibrosis make preservation of distal ureteral blood supply during urinary diversion tenuous and challenging. This is especially of concern in patients requiring pelvic exenteration for colorectal or gynecological malignancy, which often necessitate radiation therapy prior to surgical intervention. Radiation history is also an important contributor commonly in patients undergoing benign diversion for radiation cystitis.

Several groups have tested whether varied surgical methods may offer risk reduction. Surgical anastomotic approach has not significantly impacted ureteroenteric stricture rate. However, a more recent study suggests that intracorporeal diversion confers a higher risk of ureteroenteric stricture. The gold standard for treatment of ureteroenteric stricture is open repair with ureteral reimplantation. Open surgical repair has success of 92-100%, while endoscopic management has success of 30-50%.

A recent study demonstrated that through the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescent angiography while performing urinary diversion using the DaVinci robotic system, that they were able to reduce stricture rates from 10.6% to 0%. Use of this technology allows the surgeon to evaluate the vascular supply to the ureter as well as the newly created ureteroenteric anastomosis. This significant reduction in complications has tremendous implications for improvement in patient care and reduction of morbidity. Many patients are not candidates for robotic urinary diversion and thus undergo open surgery. Fluorescent angiography has also shown promise for decreasing ureteroenteric stricture rate in open surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22902
        • University of Virginia

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergoing open urinary diversion

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide informed consent
  • Robotic-assisted urinary diversion
  • Pregnant Women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Study Arm: SPY fluorescent angiography
This group has had SPY fluorescent angiography used intraoperatively during urinary diversion. To be compared with historic controls who did not.
No Intervention: Historic Control Arm: Urinary diversion without the use of SPY
This arm consists of 215 historic controls who have undergone urinary diversion at UVA from 2015-2020 without the use of SPY fluorescent angiography

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Incidence of Ureteroenteric Stricture
Time Frame: 1.5 years
1.5 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
90 day postoperative readmission
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
Rate of hydronephrosis, pyelonephritis, or renal impairment
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2021

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 26, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 23, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ureteral Obstruction

Clinical Trials on SPY fluorescent angiography

3
Subscribe