Efficacy of Maitland Mobilization in Shoulder Pathology

November 24, 2022 updated by: Karishma Chuhermal Lalwani Mangtani, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria

Effec of Maitland in Shoulder Pathology

The shoulder is a mobile structure which generates a lot of pathologies. One of them is rotator cuff tendinosis. On the other hand, it has been investigated that Maitland is effective for reducing pain and for mobility in the cervical and lumbar spine and in joints such as the knee and ankle, however, there are few studies that confirm that it is effective in shoulder pathologies.So here the investigatprs want to study the effectiveness of Maitland as an adjunctive treatment for shoulder pathologies, comparing it with conventional physiotherapy treatment, in relation to the reduction of pain and increased mobility. For that the investigators have a randomized clinical trial with two group.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Group 1 receives tens, SW, conventional physiotherapy and exercises as treatment. Group 2 receives tens, SW, Mailtland, and exercises. An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

63

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Las Palmas
      • Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain, 35006
        • GRUPO ICOT Policlínico Las Palmas.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have a shoulder pathology.
  • Have a restriction at least of two ranges of movement of the shoulder.
  • Sign the consent before starting the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with a history of shoulder or neck surgery.
  • Patients with neurological damage such as stroke or disease of Parkinson's, as well as those with rheumatism, osteoporosis, surgical fixation, or malignant tumors.
  • Have a radiating pain in shoulder from a cervical injury.
  • Pregnant patients.
  • Patients who do not sign the consent before starting the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Maitland group
31 patients receives tens, SW, Maitland, and exercises. An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
Active Comparator: Control group
32 receives tens, SW, conventional physiotherapy and exercises as treatment. An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.
An assessment is carried out at the beginning of the treatment, at the end and 2-4 weeks after finishing the treatment. The EVA ASES, DASH and SF-36 scales are included and the biomechanics study is used for the range of mobility.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of Range of Motion (ROM)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Active ROM of the affected shoulder is measured using a Mechanic Analysis to assess range of motion. These measurements included abduction, flexion, internal rotation, and external rotation.
Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Change of Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Visual analogue score (VAS) was done at rest and at shoulder movement. VAS was explained to the patients during assessment as 0 equal no pain and 10 equal worst imaginable pain.
Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Change of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was filled by patient during assessment as 0 equal better functionality and 100 equal worst functionality
Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of American shoulder and elbow Surgeons" (ASES)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) was filled by patient during assessment as 0 equal worst functionality and 100 is equal better functionality
Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Change of 36-Item Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment
Health Survey (SF-36) was filled by patient during assessment as 0 equal worst health and 100 is equal better health
Baseline and 1, 5, and 7 weeks after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Karishma LALWANI MANGTAN, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria (ULPGC)

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 3, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

October 31, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 29, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ULPGC02

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Tendinosis

Clinical Trials on Maitland

Subscribe