- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05071248
Evaluation of the Effect of Robot-assisted Early Mobilization - Project MobiStaR (MobiStaR)
Evaluation of the Effect of Robot-assisted Early Mobilization on Critically Ill Patients, on the Mobilisation Behaviour and Experience of Mobilizing Professionals and Organisational Processes in an Intensive Care Unit
Within the MobiStaR project the adaptation of procedures in an intensive care unit combined with the use of this robotic system will create the conditions to increase the mobilization rate of critically ill intensive care patients significantly, possibly thereby increasing the rehabilitation outcomes for these patients and developing a new standard of care for robot-assisted early mobilization.
The intervention study will assess the organizational feasibility of robot-assisted early mobilization (starting in the first 72 hours after admission to the ICU), the behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals and the effects on patient outcomes in terms of ventilation time, muscle mass (sonographic examination) and physical activity (measured by established scores such as Functional Status Score for ICU (FSS-ICU) and Medical Research Council (MRC) classification).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Early mobilization means the mobilization of critically ill patients in the early course after admission to the intensive care unit. The positive influence of early mobilization of critically ill patients on various aspects of patient outcomes has already been demonstrated. However, the implementation of early mobilization in clinical practice is difficult. Especially the high personnel effort is a barrier.
The Munich-based company Reactive Robotics (RR) is currently developing the world's first adaptive robotic assistance system VEMO©, which has CE approval for the planned indication and is to be used in the medium term for mobilizing intensive care patients.
Within the MobiStaR project, the adaptation of procedures in an intensive care unit combined with the use of this robotic system will create the conditions to significantly increase the mobilization rate of critically ill intensive care patients, possibly thereby increasing the rehabilitation results for these patients and developing a new standard of care for robot-assisted early mobilization. In this project, the robotic system will be used in anesthesiology intensive care units of the Ludwigs-Maximilians-University hospital.
Within this study, the effects of robot-assisted early mobilization will now be evaluated. This study comprises three study arms, in which (1) the feasibility and practicability of robot-assisted early mobilization, (2) the behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals, and (3) the effect on patient outcomes will be evaluated.
The study is monocentric, prospective, interventional, does not include invasive procedures or blood sampling and has multiple data collection time points.
- The feasibility of robot-assisted early mobilization surveys concomitantly how many VEM therapies can be implemented in how many patients as well as if and which adverse events occur.
- The behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals will be evaluated by using episodic interviews and standardized observations. Nurses with advanced training in anesthesia and intensive care, nurses and physiotherapists who have at least three years of professional experience in an intensive care unit as well as medical specialists with completed specialist training or a leading position in the intensive care unit will be included.
- The effects on patient outcomes, primarily ventilation duration, muscle mass (sonographic examination) and physical activity (measured by established scores such as FSS-ICU and MRC classification), will be measured at different time points and compared with a historical patient population. Secondary factors such as delirium incidence, hemodynamic parameters, respiratory parameters but also longitudinal parameters such as ICU and hospital length of stay will be analyzed from routine data/patient records. Informed consenting patients undergoing a planned surgical procedure that is postoperatively associated with intensive care treatment and an anticipated duration of ventilation of more than 48 hours will be included. These patients will receive standardized early mobilization using the robotic system at either ten frequencies or for seven days. No invasive procedures such as blood sampling will be performed as part of the study. Outcomes will be compared with a historical comparison group to evaluate the effect of robot-assisted VEM (very early mobilization). Approximately 30 patients will be included. The outcomes will be compared with those of a historical group (n=30) treated with conventional early mobilization.
The intervention is planned for a duration of five to six months starting in September 2021.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
BY
-
Munich, BY, Germany, 81337
- LudwigMaximilians
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- planned surgical intervention
- postoperative intensive medical and therapeutic treatment
- expected duration of ventilation > 48 hours
- age ≥ 18 years
- preoperative informed consent by the patients in the study
- weight >45 kg and <135 kg
- body height >1.50 m and <1.95 m
Exclusion Criteria:
- patient refusal to participate in the study
- unable to give consent
- chronically bedridden before inclusion
- clinical Frailty Scale ≥ 7
- chronic ventilation (over 24h) before ICU admission
- increased intracranial pressure / risk for increased intracranial pressure / recent cerebral hemorrhage
- pregnancy
- pre-existing neuromuscular disease resulting in chronic limitation of strength and efficiency
- sternotomy / sternectomy during surgical procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Active Comparator: patients with robot-assisted early mobilization
All patients will receive a physical examination at various time points to assess physical functionality and muscle strength, as well as a sonographic examination of leg muscles, diaphragm, and lungs.
These examinations should be performed on day -1 (preoperatively), on postoperative days 1,2,3, then once a week if the patient remains in the ICU, on day 28, on the day of discharge from the ICU, and on a follow-up examination approximately 3 months after discharge from the ICU.The follow-up examination should only take place if the patients present themselves at the hospital anyway due to medically indicated follow-up examinations (not study-related).
Alternatively, patients can be asked about their condition by telephone.
|
The robot used for early mobilization is able to verticalize the patients in their bed without transfer and to generate a movement of the legs that measures and supports the patients' own movement.
The device meets the requirements for mobilizing critically ill patients in an intensive care unit, maintaining hygiene standards and providing the best possible support for the patient's own movement.
|
No Intervention: patients with conventional early mobilization (historic group)
All patients fulfill the same criteria like the intervention group and receive conventional early mobilization.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - Ventilation duration
Time Frame: 6 months
|
changes in ventilation duration (in hours) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination Area of the M.rec.femoris
Time Frame: 6 months
|
muscle mass (sonographic examination, in millimeters): Area of the M. rec.
femoris in comparison to a historical patient group (in cm²)
|
6 months
|
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness M. quad. femoris
Time Frame: 6 months
|
muscle mass: Thickness M. quad.
Femoris (in cm²) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination- motility diaphragm breathing
Time Frame: 6 months
|
muscle mass: motility of the diaphragm during breathing (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness diaphragm inspiration
Time Frame: 6 months
|
muscle mass: Thickness of diaphragm during inspiration (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - sonographic examination thickness diaphragm exhalation
Time Frame: 6 months
|
muscle mass: Thickness of diaphragm during exhalation (in cm) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - physical activity - FSS-ICU
Time Frame: 6 months
|
physical activity measured using the score FSS-ICU (0 -35) in comparison to a historical patient group.
A higher value means a better outcome.
|
6 months
|
Evaluation of the effect of robot-assisted early mobilization on critically ill patients - physical activity
Time Frame: 6 months
|
physical activity on upper and lower extremity measured using the Medical Research Council (MRC) score in comparison to a historical patient group.
(0=absent muscle contraction, 1=visible muscle contraction, 2=movement when gravity is eliminated, 3=active movement against gravity, 4=active movement against resistance, 5=normal strength.)
|
6 months
|
Behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals - qualitative interviews
Time Frame: 6 months
|
subjectively experienced emotions, motivating and challenging factors - evaluated with a semi-structured interview guideline
|
6 months
|
Behavior and experience of the mobilizing professionals - qualitative observations
Time Frame: 6 months
|
behavior and body posture during the mobilization - evaluated with a standardized observation sheet
|
6 months
|
Feasibility in organizational processes - eligible patients
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Frequency of eligible patients (count per week: included patients in the study/ new eligible patients in the ICUs)
|
6 months
|
Feasibility in organizational processes - mobilizations
Time Frame: 6 months
|
frequency of robot-assisted mobilizations (per patient per day)
|
6 months
|
Feasibility in organizational processes - adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
|
adverse events (count of patient-related, user-related or technology-related adverse events)
|
6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Delir
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Delir incidence using the CAM ICU: number of days without Delir.
1 = pathological; 2 = normal; 3 = not performed in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Consciousness
Time Frame: 6 months
|
level of consciousness using the Glasgow Coma Scale (3-15) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Sedation level
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Sedation level using the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) (-5 - +5) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Pain (VAS)
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Pain - with the use of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (before and after mobilization) (0-10) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
health related quality of life
Time Frame: 6 months
|
Health-related quality of life after 3 months using the the SF-36 (Short form questionnaire) (0-100) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
Blood pressure
Time Frame: 6 months
|
hemodynamics - Blood pressure (in mmHg) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
catecholamine demand
Time Frame: 6 months
|
hemodynamics - catecholamine demand (cumulative over 24 hours) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
heart rate
Time Frame: 6 months
|
hemodynamics - heart rate (1/min) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
cardiac output
Time Frame: 6 months
|
hemodynamics - Cardiac output (in l/min) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
oxygen consumption
Time Frame: 6 months
|
hemodynamics - Oxygen consumption (in l) in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
respiration
Time Frame: 6 months
|
respiration- Maximum respiratory rate for 24h in comparison to a historical patient group
|
6 months
|
ICU Score - SOFA
Time Frame: 6 months
|
ICU Scores like Sepsis-related organ failure assessment score (SOFA) (0-24) in comparison to a historical patient group.
A higher value means a worse outcome.
|
6 months
|
ICU Scores - APACHE II
Time Frame: 6 months
|
ICU Scores like Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Disease Classification System II (APACHE II) (0-71) in comparison to a historical patient group.
A higher value means a worse outcome.
|
6 months
|
ICU Scores - SAPS II
Time Frame: 6 months
|
ICU Scores like Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) (0-163) in comparison to a historical patient group.
A higher value means a worse outcome.
|
6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Michael Zoller, PD Dr., Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
- Principal Investigator: Inge Eberl, Prof. Dr., Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt
- Principal Investigator: Eduard Kraft, PD Dr., Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
- Principal Investigator: Uli Fischer, Dr., Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 16SV842
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Robotics
-
Vanderbilt University Medical CenterTerminatedLaparoscopy | Nephrectomy | Prostatectomy | RoboticsUnited States
-
Smith & Nephew, Inc.CompletedKnee Replacement | Surgical RoboticsUnited States
-
Ulsan University HospitalMinistry of Health & Welfare, KoreaCompletedArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee | RoboticsKorea, Republic of
-
George Washington UniversityCompletedMedical Students Naive to Surgical RoboticsUnited States
-
Ewha Womans UniversityCompletedArthritis | Knee Arthropathy | Robotics
-
Vrije Universiteit BrusselCompletedHealthy | Mental Fatigue | Robotics | Industrial WorkBelgium
-
Korea University Guro HospitalNot yet recruitingLung Cancer | Robotics
-
WandercraftCompletedStroke | Stroke, Acute | Robotics | Stroke, SubacuteFrance
-
Vanderbilt UniversityCompletedPituitary | Robotics | Sinus Surgery | Skull Base | Endonasal SurgeryUnited States
-
Okan UniversityCompletedCerebral Palsy | RoboticsTurkey