- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05112679
Limb Health and Socket Pressure in Response to Powered Ankle Protheses (OPORP)
November 19, 2025 updated by: Dr. Sashwati Roy, Indiana University
Limb Health and Socket Pressure in Response to Powered Ankle Prostheses
this project seeks to understand and quantify the effects of powered transtibial prostheses on socket loading and direct measures of residual limb health so as to inform the optimization of prosthesis fit.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Some estimates suggest that by 2050, as many as 3.6 million people in the United States will be living with limb loss, and at least 60% of them will have had at least a foot removed For military personnel, combat-related amputations remain one of the most common major disabling war-related injuries from modern armed conflict.
Technological advancements in active prosthetic devices for individuals with transtibial amputation offer the potential for superior function in key areas that could lead to higher rates of RTD and improved quality of life.
Currently intended primarily for individuals with a K-level of 3 or 4, active transtibial prostheses that provide controlled plantar/dorsiflexion in either swing (microprocessor-controlled prostheses) or late stance (prostheses with powered propulsion) are likely to become the gold standard in the future as technology continues to improve Indeed, users of these types of prostheses have higher mobility than those using any of the other four categories of prosthetic ankle-foot mechanisms for unlimited community ambulators.
Note that a major insurer has recently declared microprocessor-controlled ankle-foot prostheses medically necessary for members whose functional level is 3 or above.The PROPRIO FOOT® by Ossur, is a microprocessor-controlled prosthesis that regulates the angle of ankle dorsiflexion during the swing phase.
This added ankle control of these devices reduces the risk of falls by increasing toe clearance supports more natural standing posture on slopes and improves stair and slope ascent/descent capability by adapting to the change in terrain.
On stairs, the PROPRIO FOOT® has been shown to improve affected leg knee kinematics (increased knee flexion) and kinetics (increased knee moment) instance.
These improvements also contributed to higher interlimb symmetry reduced energetic cost of slope ascent and higher Amputee Mobility Predictor with a Prosthesis (AMPPRO) scores .
Although the ankle of the PROPRIO FOOT® can be controlled in swing, the device does not have adequate power to provide an active propulsion instance.
The Empower ankle by Ottobock is a powered prosthesis that provides active propulsion in late stance to mimic the positive work performed by the ankle plantar flexors in push-off.
The Empower has been shown to improve affected leg kinematics (increased ankle range of motion and reduced knee flexion) on smooth flat ground ramp ascent and gravel].
In terms of kinetics, the Empower likewise results in increased ankle power on level ground stairs and ramps .
Active prostheses like the PROPRIO FOOT® and Empower ankle offer great potential to more completely restore the locomotor capabilities of individuals with transtibial amputation, perhaps enhancing RTD for military personnel.
As with all prosthetic components, though, these active devices are of little use if they induce pain and/or injury at the residual limb to the degree that the user will simply not wear them.
The investigators will examine how optimal fit of lower limb prostheses can impact individuals comfort and/or reduce irritation.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
6
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Indiana
-
Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46228
- Indiana University Health Methodist Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Ages 18 and above
- Weight ≤ 280 lb
- Ambulate at a K3 level or higher-level determined from patient EHR
- At least 3 months post-amputation per physician discretion
- Residual limb length greater than 4.5 inches
- Use of a passive prosthesis
- Unilateral transtibial amputees
- Must be able to ambulate without any assistive devices
- Subjects must be able to follow directions and give informed consent on their own
Exclusion Criteria:
- Conditions and/or co-morbidities that would prevent wearing a prosthetic socket, affect gait, or influence function of the contralateral limb
- Other amputees
- Cognitive deficits or mental health problems that would limit ability to consent and participate fully in the study protocol
- Women who are pregnant or who plan to become pregnant in the near future
- Individuals diagnosed with renal failure
- Participants unwilling to wear a cloth face covering for the duration of each visit
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Proprio Foot
each participant was randomized to use Proprio or empower based on randomization followed by switching the other empower or proprio
|
PROPRIO FOOT is a microprocessor controlled foot that offer great potential to more completely restore the locomotor capabilities of individuals with transtibial amputation, Empower: Empower powered ankle offer great potential to more completely restore the locomotor capabilities of individuals with transtibial amputation.
|
|
Experimental: Empower foot
ach participant was randomized to use Proprio or empower based on randomization followed by switching the other empower or proprio
|
PROPRIO FOOT is a microprocessor controlled foot that offer great potential to more completely restore the locomotor capabilities of individuals with transtibial amputation, Empower: Empower powered ankle offer great potential to more completely restore the locomotor capabilities of individuals with transtibial amputation.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Powered Transtibial Prosthesis on Socket Pressure
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
effects of a powered transtibial prosthesis on the socket pressure for level-ground walking to a microprocessor-controlled prosthesis and a passive prosthesis
|
4 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Skin Perfusion
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Changes measured with laser speckle imaging.
The perfusion data is expressed as perfusion units (PU) which is a dimensionless ratio calculated by dividing the standard deviation of the intensity in a given area by the mean intensity within that area, essentially representing the degree of variation in the speckle pattern.
Higher number indicates greater perfusion which is better outcome.
|
4 weeks
|
|
Transepidermal Water Loss (TEWL)
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Water loss change is measured via the TEWL device- the lower score mean a better outcome for TEWL.
|
4 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sashwati Roy, PhD, Indiana University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 15, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 19, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
July 19, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 4, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
November 9, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 25, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 19, 2025
Last Verified
November 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 12350
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The investigators will share deidentified patient data consisting of the patient PEQ and comfort scores and transpepidermal water loss data upon request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
6 months after completion
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Email study contact
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- SAP
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Amputation
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabUniversity of AlbertaActive, not recruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, LimbUnited States
-
Liberating Technologies, Inc.Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedAmputation | Prosthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...CompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Upper Limb Amputation at the Hand | Upper Limb Amputation at the WristUnited States
-
Medipol UniversityRecruitingEvaluation of Functionality of Amputees According to the Medicare Functional K Classification SystemAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerTurkey
-
Point DesignsEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAmputation; Traumatic, Hand | Amputation, CongenitalUnited States
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabRecruitingAmputation | Amputation, Traumatic | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb | Amputation of KneeUnited States
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCompletedAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, LowerItaly
-
Hacettepe UniversityCompleted
-
Boninger, Michael, MDNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS); Ripple Therapeutics...RecruitingAmputation | Amputation; Traumatic, HandUnited States
Clinical Trials on PROPRIO FOOT® by Ossur & Empower ankle by Ottobock
-
VA New York Harbor Healthcare SystemWalter Reed National Military Medical Center; VA Puget Sound Health Care System and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingProsthesis User | Amputation; Traumatic, Limb, LowerUnited States
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCompleted