- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05129098
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Pacing in Atrioventricular Block
October 25, 2023 updated by: Georgios Leventopoulos, University Hospital of Patras
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Conventional Pacing in Patients With Atrioventricular Node Disorders: a Randomized, Control Study
Recently, the concept of physiological pacing has emerged in the clinical practice, in an attempt to prevent the deteriorating effects of right ventricular pacing in the long-term.
Left bundle branch pacing seems to be a safe procedure with promising results that may prevent intraventricular dyssynchony compared with the conventional right ventricular pacing.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Detailed Description
In this prospective, randomized study the outcomes regarding echocardiographic indices of dyssynchrony in left bundle branch versus conventional right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular node disease will be compared In recent years, His pacing has demonstrated better results regarding resynchronization compared to conventional biventricular pacing in trials of 3D mapping.
However, technical difficulties that relate to unstable lead positioning or inability in succeeding low pacing threshold have led to low success rates.
An alternative site of physiological pacing that could possibly overcome these issues, while maintaining ventricular synchrony is left bundle branch pacing.
The lead implantation of LBB pacing is performed using the Select Secure (3830) pacing lead.
The lead is screwed into the interventricular septum, until left bundle branch pacing is achieved.
The randomized patients 24 hours after the procedure are echocardiographically evaluated and indices of mechanical dyssynchrony are recorded.
Follow-up is conducted at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
38
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Rion
-
Patra, Rion, Greece, 26504
- University Hospital of Patras
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age>18 years old
- Patients with atrioventricular block and EF>50% with a predicted ventricular pacing rate>20%
- Patients with intraventricular septal diameter>8mm
- Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Indication for CRT or ICD device
- Patients with no subclavian approach, who are candidates for leadless devices
- Presence of severe tricuspid regurgitation
- Patients who are candidates for implantation from the right side, as currently the provided tools for left bundle branch pacing fascilitate only left sided pacemaker implantations
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Left Bundle Branch Pacing
Implantation of a left bundle branch lead via sheath, to perform left bundle branch pacing
|
Implantation of a left bundle branch pacing lead via sheath
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Right Venticular Pacing
The ventricular lead will be implanted in the right ventricle in the conventional way
|
Active fixation lead (standard)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Echocardiographic dyssynchrony index, as expressed with Global Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Efficiency (GWE) (%)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and the global left ventricular work efficiency- as a measure of dyssynchrony- will be recorded.
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Procedure Time (min)
Time Frame: 1 Day of procedure
|
The total time required for the completion of the procedure
|
1 Day of procedure
|
|
Fluoroscopy Time (min)
Time Frame: 1 Day of procedure
|
The total time of fluoroscopy
|
1 Day of procedure
|
|
Dose Area Product (DAP) (cGy/cm2)
Time Frame: 1 Day of procedure
|
Total Radiation Dose as expressed with DAP
|
1 Day of procedure
|
|
Implant success
Time Frame: 1 Day of procedure
|
Successful implantation with pacing threshold<2 V
|
1 Day of procedure
|
|
Complications associated with pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: through study completion at 1 year post randomisation
|
General device related complications: pneumothorax, hemothorax, infection, tamponade, hematoma, lead reoperation Specific complications associated with the left bundle branch pacing procedure: intraventricular septum rupture, septal perforator branch injury with subsequent myocardial infarction or lead displacement
|
through study completion at 1 year post randomisation
|
|
B natriuretic peptide measurement (pg/ml)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Blood samples are extracted in all patients at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Stroke volume index (SVi) (ml/m2)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and the SVi will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Ejection Fraction (EF) (%)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and the EF will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS) (%)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and the GLS will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Left Atrium Strain (%)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and the Left Atrium Strain will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Left Atrium Strain Rate (1/s)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and the Left Atrium Strain Rate will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Aortic Time- Velocity Integral (TVI) (cm)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and the aortic TVI will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Global Work Index (GWI) (mmHg%)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and GWI will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Global Constructive Work (GCW) (mmHg%)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and GCW will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Global Wasted Work (GWW) (mmHg%)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and GWW will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Segmental CW, WW at the mid septal wall
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and segmental WI, CW, WW at the mid septal wall will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Segmental CW, WW at the basal lateral wall
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and segmental WI, CW, WW at the basal lateral wall will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Peak Strain Dispersion (PSD) (msec)
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Follow-up transthoracic echocardiography will be held 24 hours, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and PSD will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Changes in capture threshold (V) in the ventricular lead
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
The device will be interrogated at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and the potential changes in capture threshold in the ventricular lead will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
|
Changes in sense (mV) in the ventricular lead
Time Frame: 24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
The device will be interrogated at baseline, 3 months, 6 months and one year after the procedure and potential changes in sense in the ventricular lead will be recorded
|
24 hours after the procedure as baseline and change at 3 months, 6 months and one year post-procedure
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Georgios Leventopoulos, MD, PhD, University Hospital of Patras
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 13, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
December 20, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
December 20, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 19, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
November 22, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
October 27, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 25, 2023
Last Verified
October 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 251/10-05-21
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Atrioventricular Nodal Disease
-
Medtronic Cardiac Ablation SolutionsCompletedHeart Disease | Supraventricular Tachycardia | AtrioVentricular Nodal Reentrant TachycardiaUnited States, Canada
-
University Hospital of FerraraCompletedAtrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant TachycardiaItaly
-
Parc de Salut MarCompletedSupraventricular Tachycardia | Atrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant TachycardiaSpain
-
University Medical Centre LjubljanaEnrolling by invitationAtrioventricular Nodal Reentry TachycardiaSlovenia
-
Ning ZhouCompletedAtrioventricular Nodal Reentrant TachycardiaChina
-
Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenCryoCath Technologies Inc.CompletedAtrioventricular Nodal Reentry TachycardiaGermany
-
Deutsches Herzzentrum MuenchenUniversity of BergenCompletedRadiofrequency Ablation | Atrioventricular Nodal Reentry TachycardiaNorway
-
Haseki Training and Research HospitalCompletedSupraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) | Atrioventricular Nodal Re Entrant TachycardiaTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of PecsCompleted
-
Shanghai MicroPort EP MedTech Co., Ltd.CompletedParoxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia | Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia | Atrioventricular Reciprocating TachycardiaChina
Clinical Trials on Right ventricular active fixation lead
-
McGill University Health Centre/Research Institute...Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR); Heart and Stroke Foundation...RecruitingHeart Block | Pacemaker DDDCanada
-
Abbott Medical DevicesCompleted
-
University of Sao PauloDuke UniversityUnknownCardiovascular Disease | Ventricular Dysfunction | Atrioventricular Block | Arrhythmias | BradyarrhythmiasBrazil
-
Baylor Research InstituteMedtronicTerminatedCongestive Heart FailureUnited States
-
Haukeland University HospitalCompleted
-
University of KansasMedtronicCompletedChronic Heart FailureUnited States
-
R&D CardiologieCompletedHeart Failure | Left Ventricular DysfunctionNetherlands
-
University of DundeeAbbott Medical Devices; Chest, Heart and Stroke Association ScotlandCompletedHeart FailureUnited Kingdom
-
National Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases,...RecruitingRight Ventricular Dysfunction | Inferior Wall; Transmural Myocardial InfarctionPakistan
-
Aalborg University HospitalAalborg University; Sygekassernes Helsefond; Svend Andersens Foundation; Peacs; Karl...CompletedAtrioventricular Block | Pacemaker DDD | Pacing-Induced CardiomyopathyDenmark