- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05152342
Reducing Stigma Among Individuals With Addiction and Staff in the Criminal Justice System
Reducing Stigma Among Individuals With Addiction and Staff in the Criminal Justice System: A Pilot Feasibility Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Stigma is one of the most pervasive barriers to addiction care in the U.S. criminal justice (CJ) system. Stigmatizing attitudes about addiction, its intersecting conditions (i.e., criminal involvement), and its treatment (i.e., medications for opioid use disorder [MOUD]) are widespread throughout court, corrections, probation, and treatment sectors. These attitudes impact treatment decisions as well as how staff interact with clients. CJ-involved individuals with addiction are aware of this stigma, perceiving negative stereotypes, expecting to be judged, and often feeling ashamed and worthless as a result (i.e., self-stigma). Self-stigma is a robust predictor of treatment avoidance, non-compliance, and dropout in many stigmatized groups, including people with addiction and CJ involvement, making this a critical treatment barrier. Despite the negative consequences of stigma in the CJ system, there are virtually no stigma reduction interventions in this context. Given that the CJ system provides a substantial portion of addiction treatment, and untreated addiction increases risk for relapse, re-arrest, overdose, and other negative outcomes, it is essential to address stigma-related barriers to addiction care.
We drew from existing evidence-based interventions to develop a multi-level stigma intervention, Combatting Stigma to Aid Re-entry and Recovery (CSTARR), that simultaneously targets CJ staff attitudes as well as CJ-involved individuals' ability to cope with stigma in separate client and staff interventions. The staff intervention involves a half-day Stigma Awareness Training, and the client intervention involves a three-session Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for self-stigma group that was adapted to address criminal involvement in addition to addiction stigma. We will deliver both interventions virtually in 6 (primarily rural) Tennessee counties that contain infrastructure called the Tennessee Recovery Oriented Compliance Strategy (TN-ROCS). TN-ROCS coordinates multiple CJ sectors (i.e., courts, corrections, probation, treatment) to divert and treat people with addiction, thus presenting a unique unified system to intervene with stigma at both client and staff levels. Also, select TN-ROCS counties are integrating MOUD services, providing an opportunity to reduce stigma that may ultimately impact MOUD engagement. This project aims to 1) examine the feasibility, acceptability, and implementation considerations of integrating CSTARR in the TN-ROCS program, and 2) determine whether CSTARR impacts individual, staff, and program-level outcomes.
We aim to recruit 25 stakeholders, 80 clients, and 75 staff over the course of this 18-month project to participate in our intervention and evaluation efforts. Staff and clients will be asked to complete online surveys before and after the intervention, as well as 1- and 3-month follow ups, for which they will receive gift-cards. The overall goal of this project is to examine the feasibility and utility of stigma reduction efforts in the criminal justice system to determine whether they can help facilitate engagement with evidence-based addiction care and improve client and staff outcomes.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kelly E. Moore, PhD
- Phone Number: 423-439-4849
- Email: mooreke2@etsu.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Tennessee
-
Johnson City, Tennessee, United States, 37614
- East Tennessee State University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Any legal system staff (e.g., judges, attorneys, probation officers, treatment staff, support staff) who work with the Tennessee Recovery Oriented Compliance Strategy (TN-ROCS) program in Sullivan, Jefferson, Grainger, Sevier, Monroe, and McMinn counties are eligible to participate in the staff training.
- Clients who have been accepted into the Tennessee Recovery Oriented Compliance Strategy (TN-ROCS) program in Sullivan, Jefferson, Grainger, Sevier, Monroe, and McMinn counties are eligible to participate in the staff training.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Staff who have not had contact with TN-ROCS clients in the past 90 days are not eligible.
- Clients who are not accepted into the TN-ROCS program, or who become re-incarcerated are not eligible to participate.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Non-Randomized
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Staff intervention
Half day virtual training for staff focusing on stigma reduction strategies.
|
Multilevel intervention package addressing stigma associated with substance use and criminal involvement for staff and justice-involved clients enrolled in a diversion treatment program.
|
Experimental: Client intervention
Three session virtual therapy group for clients focusing on behavioral strategies to cope with stigma.
|
Multilevel intervention package addressing stigma associated with substance use and criminal involvement for staff and justice-involved clients enrolled in a diversion treatment program.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Perspectives on Stigma Reduction from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
24-item internally developed measure that assesses perspectives on stigma and use of stigma reduction strategies among staff, total score ranges from 24 to 216 with higher scores indicating more positive views
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Change in Social Distance Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
5-item adapted measure that assesses desired social distance from people with a criminal and addiction history, total score ranges from 5-25 with higher scores indicating less desired social distance
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Change in Difference and Disdain Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
9-item adapted measure that assesses how staff view people who have substance use problems and criminal involvement, total score ranges from 9-81 with higher scores indicating more differences/disdain
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Change in Substance Use Self-Stigma Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
41-item measure that assess how clients view themselves because of their criminal involvement and substance use problems, total score ranges from 41 to 205 with higher scores indicating more self-stigma
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Change in Internalized Shame Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
24-item measures that assesses internalized shame, total score ranges from 40-120, with higher scores indicating more internalized shame
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Change in Self-efficacy from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
4-item measure that assesses clients' self-efficacy for navigating stigma stressors, total score ranges from 4-40 with higher scores indicating more self-efficacy
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Attitudes Toward Prisoners Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
36-item measure that assesses attitudes, beliefs, and negative stereotypes about people with criminal involvement, total score ranges from 36 to 180 with high scores indicating more stigmatizing attitudes
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Change in Dual-Relationship Inventory from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
9-item measure that assesses how staff view and treat the justice-involved people they oversee, total scores range from 9 to 63 with higher scores indicating better relationships
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Change in Treatment Experiences Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client) from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
13-item adapted measure that assesses how clients feel about their ability to complete treatment, total scores range from 13 to 130 with higher scores indicating more confidence in treatment
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Change in Dual-Relationship Inventory from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
9-item adapted measure that assesses how justice-involved clients feel staff view and treat them, total scores range from 9 to 63 with higher scores indicating better relationships
|
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Implementation outcome (staff)
Time Frame: 1-day
|
12-item internally developed measure that assesses how appropriate, useful, and relevant the stigma training is, total scores range from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating more acceptability
|
1-day
|
Implementation outcome (client)
Time Frame: 1-day
|
12-item internally developed measure that assesses how appropriate, useful, and relevant the stigma group is, total scores range from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating more acceptability
|
1-day
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 0721.5sd
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Behavior
-
The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleWithdrawnFeeding Behavior | Behavior | Food Habits | Behavior and Behavior MechanismsUnited States
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingAddictive Behavior | Adolescent BehaviorEgypt
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityEnrolling by invitationEvaluating the Impact of CHOICE-AYA on Contraceptive Use, Continuation and Satisfaction (CHOICE-AYA)Sexual Behavior | Contraception Behavior | Reproductive BehaviorUnited States
-
Cornell UniversityUnited States Department of Agriculture (USDA)CompletedChild Behavior | Health Behavior | Adolescent BehaviorUnited States
-
University of FloridaNational Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR)Not yet recruitingChild Behavior | Behavior and Behavior Mechanisms
-
University of California, BerkeleySave the Children; Health for a Prosperous Nation; Camara Education, Tanzania; Ubongo... and other collaboratorsCompletedBehavior, Child | Behavior, Adaptive | Behavior, SocialTanzania
-
Aga Khan UniversityUnited Nations; Global Affairs CanadaActive, not recruitingContraception | Contraception Behavior | Maternal Behavior | Reproductive BehaviorPakistan
-
Children's Hospital Los AngelesNational Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (NIMHD)Not yet recruitingChild Behavior | Child Behavior Problem | Child Behavior Disorders | Racism
-
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)Recruiting
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompleted
Clinical Trials on Stigma Awareness Training for Legal System Staff
-
RTI InternationalFogarty International Center of the National Institute of Health; Muhimbili...CompletedDrug Use Stigma in HIV Treatment ClinicsTanzania
-
University of California, San FranciscoCompleted
-
Umeå UniversityCompletedDepression | Anxiety | Stress-related ProblemSweden
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH); National Center for Complementary...Completed
-
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research InstituteFundació La Marató de TV3CompletedSatisfaction | Spinal Cord Injury, Acute | Patient Non-Compliance | Professional-Patient Relations | Sensitivity Training GroupsSpain
-
Nottingham Trent UniversityCompletedFibromyalgia Syndrome
-
Umeå UniversityUniversity West, SwedenCompletedChallenging BehaviourSweden
-
University of VirginiaJoslin Diabetes CenterCompleted
-
RTI InternationalMedical Research Council, South AfricaRecruiting
-
Umeå UniversityVästernorrland County Council, Sweden; Västerbotten County Council, SwedenRecruitingDepressive Disorder | Depression in Adolescence | Dysthymia and Chronic DepressionSweden