Reducing Stigma Among Individuals With Addiction and Staff in the Criminal Justice System

October 10, 2023 updated by: Kelly E. Moore (Schirr), East Tennessee State University

Reducing Stigma Among Individuals With Addiction and Staff in the Criminal Justice System: A Pilot Feasibility Trial

Stigma is one of the most pervasive barriers to addiction care in the U.S. criminal justice (CJ) system. However, there have been no stigma reduction interventions developed for this context. This project addresses this gap with a new multi-level stigma intervention, Combatting Stigma to Aid Reentry and Recovery (CSTARR), for justice-involved people with addiction and criminal justice staff. This intervention will be implemented in 6 (mostly rural) counties in TN for clients and staff in the Tennessee Recovery Oriented Compliance Strategy (TN-ROCS) program, which coordinates multiple CJ sectors (i.e., courts, corrections, probation, treatment) to divert and treat people with addiction. This project aims to 1) examine the feasibility, acceptability, and implementation considerations of integrating CSTARR in the TN-ROCS program, and 2) determine whether CSTARR impacts individual, staff, and program-level outcomes. We aim to recruit 25 stakeholders, 80 clients, and 75 staff over the course of this 18-month project to participate in our intervention and evaluation efforts. Staff and clients will be asked to complete online surveys before and after the intervention, as well as 1- and 3-month follow ups, for which they will receive gift-cards. The overall goal of this project is to examine the feasibility and utility of stigma reduction efforts in the criminal justice system to determine whether they can help facilitate engagement with evidence-based addiction care and improve client and staff outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Stigma is one of the most pervasive barriers to addiction care in the U.S. criminal justice (CJ) system. Stigmatizing attitudes about addiction, its intersecting conditions (i.e., criminal involvement), and its treatment (i.e., medications for opioid use disorder [MOUD]) are widespread throughout court, corrections, probation, and treatment sectors. These attitudes impact treatment decisions as well as how staff interact with clients. CJ-involved individuals with addiction are aware of this stigma, perceiving negative stereotypes, expecting to be judged, and often feeling ashamed and worthless as a result (i.e., self-stigma). Self-stigma is a robust predictor of treatment avoidance, non-compliance, and dropout in many stigmatized groups, including people with addiction and CJ involvement, making this a critical treatment barrier. Despite the negative consequences of stigma in the CJ system, there are virtually no stigma reduction interventions in this context. Given that the CJ system provides a substantial portion of addiction treatment, and untreated addiction increases risk for relapse, re-arrest, overdose, and other negative outcomes, it is essential to address stigma-related barriers to addiction care.

We drew from existing evidence-based interventions to develop a multi-level stigma intervention, Combatting Stigma to Aid Re-entry and Recovery (CSTARR), that simultaneously targets CJ staff attitudes as well as CJ-involved individuals' ability to cope with stigma in separate client and staff interventions. The staff intervention involves a half-day Stigma Awareness Training, and the client intervention involves a three-session Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for self-stigma group that was adapted to address criminal involvement in addition to addiction stigma. We will deliver both interventions virtually in 6 (primarily rural) Tennessee counties that contain infrastructure called the Tennessee Recovery Oriented Compliance Strategy (TN-ROCS). TN-ROCS coordinates multiple CJ sectors (i.e., courts, corrections, probation, treatment) to divert and treat people with addiction, thus presenting a unique unified system to intervene with stigma at both client and staff levels. Also, select TN-ROCS counties are integrating MOUD services, providing an opportunity to reduce stigma that may ultimately impact MOUD engagement. This project aims to 1) examine the feasibility, acceptability, and implementation considerations of integrating CSTARR in the TN-ROCS program, and 2) determine whether CSTARR impacts individual, staff, and program-level outcomes.

We aim to recruit 25 stakeholders, 80 clients, and 75 staff over the course of this 18-month project to participate in our intervention and evaluation efforts. Staff and clients will be asked to complete online surveys before and after the intervention, as well as 1- and 3-month follow ups, for which they will receive gift-cards. The overall goal of this project is to examine the feasibility and utility of stigma reduction efforts in the criminal justice system to determine whether they can help facilitate engagement with evidence-based addiction care and improve client and staff outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

180

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Tennessee
      • Johnson City, Tennessee, United States, 37614
        • East Tennessee State University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any legal system staff (e.g., judges, attorneys, probation officers, treatment staff, support staff) who work with the Tennessee Recovery Oriented Compliance Strategy (TN-ROCS) program in Sullivan, Jefferson, Grainger, Sevier, Monroe, and McMinn counties are eligible to participate in the staff training.
  • Clients who have been accepted into the Tennessee Recovery Oriented Compliance Strategy (TN-ROCS) program in Sullivan, Jefferson, Grainger, Sevier, Monroe, and McMinn counties are eligible to participate in the staff training.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Staff who have not had contact with TN-ROCS clients in the past 90 days are not eligible.
  • Clients who are not accepted into the TN-ROCS program, or who become re-incarcerated are not eligible to participate.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Staff intervention
Half day virtual training for staff focusing on stigma reduction strategies.
Multilevel intervention package addressing stigma associated with substance use and criminal involvement for staff and justice-involved clients enrolled in a diversion treatment program.
Experimental: Client intervention
Three session virtual therapy group for clients focusing on behavioral strategies to cope with stigma.
Multilevel intervention package addressing stigma associated with substance use and criminal involvement for staff and justice-involved clients enrolled in a diversion treatment program.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Perspectives on Stigma Reduction from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
24-item internally developed measure that assesses perspectives on stigma and use of stigma reduction strategies among staff, total score ranges from 24 to 216 with higher scores indicating more positive views
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
Change in Social Distance Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
5-item adapted measure that assesses desired social distance from people with a criminal and addiction history, total score ranges from 5-25 with higher scores indicating less desired social distance
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
Change in Difference and Disdain Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
9-item adapted measure that assesses how staff view people who have substance use problems and criminal involvement, total score ranges from 9-81 with higher scores indicating more differences/disdain
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
Change in Substance Use Self-Stigma Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
41-item measure that assess how clients view themselves because of their criminal involvement and substance use problems, total score ranges from 41 to 205 with higher scores indicating more self-stigma
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
Change in Internalized Shame Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
24-item measures that assesses internalized shame, total score ranges from 40-120, with higher scores indicating more internalized shame
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
Change in Self-efficacy from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
4-item measure that assesses clients' self-efficacy for navigating stigma stressors, total score ranges from 4-40 with higher scores indicating more self-efficacy
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Attitudes Toward Prisoners Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
36-item measure that assesses attitudes, beliefs, and negative stereotypes about people with criminal involvement, total score ranges from 36 to 180 with high scores indicating more stigmatizing attitudes
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
Change in Dual-Relationship Inventory from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (staff)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
9-item measure that assesses how staff view and treat the justice-involved people they oversee, total scores range from 9 to 63 with higher scores indicating better relationships
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
Change in Treatment Experiences Scale from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client) from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
13-item adapted measure that assesses how clients feel about their ability to complete treatment, total scores range from 13 to 130 with higher scores indicating more confidence in treatment
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
Change in Dual-Relationship Inventory from Baseline to 3 month follow-up (client)
Time Frame: Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months
9-item adapted measure that assesses how justice-involved clients feel staff view and treat them, total scores range from 9 to 63 with higher scores indicating better relationships
Baseline, 1-day, 1-month, 3-months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation outcome (staff)
Time Frame: 1-day
12-item internally developed measure that assesses how appropriate, useful, and relevant the stigma training is, total scores range from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating more acceptability
1-day
Implementation outcome (client)
Time Frame: 1-day
12-item internally developed measure that assesses how appropriate, useful, and relevant the stigma group is, total scores range from 12 to 60 with higher scores indicating more acceptability
1-day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 9, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0721.5sd

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Behavior

Clinical Trials on Stigma Awareness Training for Legal System Staff

3
Subscribe